Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Zentralbl Chir ; 135(4): 323-9, 2010 Aug.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20806135

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Morbidity and mortality conferences (M + M) are used for the discussion of errors and thereby further education in surgery. However, it is not clear whether this kind of quality assurance has any influence on the results of surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We investigated whether M + M as part of PDCA-cylce (plan, do, check, act) with prospectively collected quality data, fixing future goals using benchmarking data and defining a strategy to reach these goals can lead to an increase in quality. RESULTS: Using surveillance data n = 673 colorectal resections were analysed. Between 2003 and 2008 we found a wound infection rate of 5.6 %. Comparing 2003-2005 (period of strategy development using M + M) and 2006-2008 (period of strategy conversion) the frequency decreased from 7.8 % to 3.5 % (p = 0.012). Thereby the risk factors for wound infection (ASA, wound classification, duration of surgery and wound infection score) were not different. CONCLUSIONS: M + M as part of this PDCA cycle resulted in a clear increase in surgical quality.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Auditoría Médica , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/mortalidad , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Anciano , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Benchmarking/normas , Lista de Verificación , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Perioperativa/normas , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA