Quantification of soil organic carbon stock in urban soils using visible and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (VNIRS) in situ or in laboratory conditions.

Urban soils, like other soils, can be sink or source for atmospheric carbon dioxide, and due to urban expansion, are receiving increasing attention. Studying their highly variable attributes requires high-density sampling, which can hardly be achieved using conventional approaches. The objective of this work was to determine the ability of visible and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (VNIRS) to quantify soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration (gC kg-1) and stock (gC dm-3, or MgC ha-1 for a given depth layer) in parks and sealed soils of two French cities, Marseille and Nantes, using spectra collected on pit walls or in laboratory conditions (air dried, 2 mm sieved samples). Better VNIRS predictions were achieved using laboratory than in situ spectra (R2 ≈ 0.8-0.9 vs. 0.7-0.8 in validation), and for sample SOC concentration than stock (R2val up to 0.83 in situ and 0.95 in the laboratory vs. 0.78 and 0.89, respectively). Stock was conventionally calculated according to four methods that variably account for coarse particles (>2 mm); and it was better predicted when coarse particles were not taken into account. This was logical using laboratory spectra, collected on 2 mm sieved samples; but concerning in situ spectra, this suggested the operator tended to put the spectrometer beside the coarsest particles during spectrum acquisition. This point is worth considering for urban soils, often rich in coarse particles. Stocks were then aggregated at the profile level: SOC stock prediction was more accurate at profile than sample level when using laboratory spectra (R2val = 0.94 vs. 0.89, respectively), probably due to uncertainty compensation; but this was not the case when using in situ spectra, possibly because samples collected for SOC analysis and corresponding VNIRS scans were not at the exact same location. This work demonstrates VNIRS usefulness for quantifying SOC stock time- and cost-effectively, in urban soils especially.

Estimation of soil organic carbon stocks of two cities, New York City and Paris.

In cities, the strong heterogeneity of soils, added to the lack of standardized assessment methods, serves as a barrier to the estimation of their soil organic carbon content (SOC), soil organic carbon stocks (SOCS; kgC m-2) and soil organic carbon citywide totals (SOCCT; kgC). Are urban soils, even the subsoils and sealed soils, contributing to the global stock of C? To address this question, the SOCS and SOCCT of two cities, New York City (NYC) and Paris, were compared. In NYC, soil samples were collected with a pedological standardized method to 1 m depth. The bulk density (Db) was measured; SOC and SOCS were calculated for 0-30 cm and 30-100 cm depths in open (unsealed) soils and sealed soils. In Paris, the samples were collected for 0-30 cm depth in open soils and sealed soils by different sampling methods. If SOC was measured, Db had to be estimated using pedotransfer functions (PTFs) refitted from the literature on NYC data; hence, SOCS was estimated. Globally, SOCS for open soils were not significantly different between both cities (11.3 ±â€¯11.5 kgC m-2 in NYC; 9.9 ±â€¯3.9 kgC m-2 in Paris). Nevertheless, SOCS was lower in sealed soils (2.9 ±â€¯2.6 kgC m-2 in NYC and 3.4 ±â€¯1.2 kgC m-2 in Paris). The SOCCT was similar between both cities for 0-30 cm (3.8 TgC in NYC and 3.5 TgC in Paris) and was also significant for the 30-100 cm layer in NYC (5.8 TgC). A comparison with estimated SOCCT in agricultural and forest soils demonstrated that the city's open soils represent important pools of organic carbon (respectively 110.4% and 44.5% more C in NYC and Paris than in agricultural soils, for 0-30 cm depth). That was mainly observable for the 1 m depth (146.6% more C in NYC than in agricultural soils). The methodology to assess urban SOCS was also discussed.