Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
Mov Disord Clin Pract ; 6(3): 235-242, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30949555

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Droxidopa is approved for adult patients with symptomatic neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH); there is limited information regarding effects on symptoms, outcomes, and quality of life (QOL) beyond two weeks of treatment. OBJECTIVE: Examine the real-world experience of patients taking droxidopa after six months of treatment. METHODS: This non-interventional, US-based, prospective cohort study utilized a pharmacy hub, identifying patients who recently started droxidopa for nOH treatment. Questionnaires for fall frequency and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were completed at baseline and one, three, and six months following droxidopa initiation. RESULTS: 179 enrolled patients completed baseline surveys. Droxidopa continuation rates were high at months one, three, and six (87%, 79%, and 75%, respectively). From baseline to month one, there was significant reduction in the proportion of patients reporting falling at least once (54.1% vs. 43.0%; P = 0.0039), with similar observations at month three (52.9% vs. 44.5%; P = 0.0588) and month six (51.4% vs. 40.0%; P = 0.0339). Significant improvements from baseline to month one were observed and maintained at months three and six for most PROs, including the Orthostatic Hypotension Symptom Assessment Item 1, Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International, Sheehan Disability Scale, Physical Component of the 8-item Short-Form Health Survey, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9. CONCLUSIONS: In this non-interventional prospective study, fewer nOH patients reported falling after one, three, and six months of droxidopa treatment. Further, improvements reported in nOH symptoms, physical function, and QOL measures were maintained for six months following treatment initiation. Results from randomized clinical trials are required to validate the findings.

2.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 69(8): 2043-55, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24744302

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: A consensus exists among clinicians that imipenem/cilastatin is the most epileptogenic carbapenem, despite inconsistencies in the literature. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials comparing carbapenems with each other or with non-carbapenem antibiotics to assess the risk of seizures for imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem and doripenem. RESULTS: In the risk difference (RD) analysis, there were increased patients with seizure (2 per 1000 persons, 95% CI 0.001, 0.004) among recipients of carbapenems versus non-carbapenem antibiotics. This difference was largely attributed to imipenem as its use was associated with an additional 4 patients per 1000 with seizure (95% CI 0.002, 0.007) compared with non-carbapenem antibiotics, whereas none of the other carbapenems was associated with increased seizure. Similarly, in the pooled OR analysis, carbapenems were associated with a significant increase in the risk of seizures relative to non-carbapenem comparator antibiotics (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.35, 2.59). The ORs for risk of seizures from imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem and doripenem compared with other antibiotics were 3.50 (95% CI 2.23, 5.49), 1.04 (95% CI 0.61, 1.77), 1.32 (95% CI 0.22, 7.74) and 0.44 (95% CI 0.13, 1.53), respectively. In studies directly comparing imipenem and meropenem, there was no difference in epileptogenicity in either RD or pooled OR analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The absolute risk of seizures with carbapenems was low, albeit higher than with non-carbapenem antibiotics. Although imipenem was more epileptogenic than non-carbapenem antibiotics, there was no statistically significant difference in the imipenem versus meropenem head-to-head comparison.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Carbapenémicos/efectos adversos , Convulsiones/inducido químicamente , Convulsiones/epidemiología , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Cilastatina/efectos adversos , Cilastatina/uso terapéutico , Combinación Cilastatina e Imipenem , Doripenem , Combinación de Medicamentos , Ertapenem , Humanos , Imipenem/efectos adversos , Imipenem/uso terapéutico , Meropenem , Riesgo , Tienamicinas/efectos adversos , beta-Lactamas/efectos adversos
3.
Am J Ther ; 20(2): 200-12, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21642833

RESUMEN

Resistant gram-positive infections, specifically methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), carry an increased risk for morbidity and mortality. Historically, MRSA has been a cause of nosocomial infections, although recent reports have noted an increased prevalence in community-acquired MRSA infections. Vancomycin is the preferred agent to treat MRSA. However, cases of S. aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin have been reported, prompting the need for alternative treatment options. In this review, we discuss the currently available agents with MRSA activity and those in development. Linezolid and quinupristin/dalfopristin have been demonstrated as effective although potential toxicities must be taken into consideration before their use. Daptomycin, tigecycline, telavancin, and ceftaroline are well tolerated but lack the clinical data to support a superior place in treatment over vancomycin. Several new agents in various stages of development have also demonstrated MRSA activity. Currently, vancomycin remains the gold-standard treatment option for MRSA infections. In situations that limit its use, consideration of patient-specific parameters, cost, and relevant clinical data demonstrating drug safety and efficacy should be employed for the selection of the appropriate alternative agent.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Diseño de Fármacos , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Vancomicina/efectos adversos , Vancomicina/farmacología , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico
4.
Mycoses ; 49(3): 226-31, 2006 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16681815

RESUMEN

In the USA, >50% of candidemia episodes occur in medical or surgical intensive care units (SICU). However, studies focused on patterns and rationale for antifungal use are lacking. The objective of this study was to evaluate systemic antifungal usage in SICU patients. Retrospective audit of SICU patients receiving antifungal therapy from four American hospitals. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, hospital variables, microbiology results, antifungal regimens and indications for therapy. A total of 2411 patient-days of antifungal use were evaluated in 225 patients. Fluconazole was the most frequently prescribed antifungal (1846 patient-days) followed by amphotericin B deoxycholate (251 patient-days), lipid formulations of amphotericin B (201 patient-days), itraconazole (71 patient-days), and caspofungin (42 patient-days). Antifungals were prescribed empirically (44%), for preemptive therapy in critically ill patients colonised with Candida (43%), or for candidiasis (12%). Candida species were recovered from 98% of patients with positive fungal cultures most commonly from pulmonary (53%) or urinary sources (17%). Fluconazole is the most frequently prescribed antifungal agent in SICUs and is most often prescribed for empiric or preemptive indications. Research efforts to identify patients who warrant preemptive antifungal therapy for invasive candidiasis could dramatically change antifungal prescribing patterns in the SICU.


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Fluconazol/uso terapéutico , Cirugía General , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Candidiasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Candidiasis/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria , Femenino , Fungemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Fungemia/prevención & control , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
5.
ScientificWorldJournal ; 6: 187-99, 2006 Feb 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16493523

RESUMEN

The objective of this article was to determine the current practice on amikacin dosing and monitoring in spinal cord injury patients from spinal cord physicians and experts. Physicians from spinal units and clinical pharmacologists were asked to provide protocol for dosing and monitoring of amikacin therapy in spinal cord injury patients. In a spinal unit in Poland, amikacin is administered usually 0.5 g twice daily. A once-daily regimen of amikacin is never used and amikacin concentrations are not determined. In Belgium, Southport (U.K.), Spain, and the VA McGuire Medical Center (Richmond, Virginia), amikacin is given once daily. Whereas peak and trough concentrations are determined in Belgium, only trough concentration is measured in Southport. In both these spinal units, modification of the dose is not routinely done with a nomogram. In Spain and the VA McGuire Medical Center, monitoring of serum amikacin concentration is not done unless a patient has renal impairment. In contrast, the dose/interval of amikacin is adjusted according to pharmacokinetic parameters at the Edward Hines VA Hospital (Hines, Illinois), where amikacin is administered q24h or q48h, depending on creatinine clearance. Spinal cord physicians from Denmark, Germany, and the Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation (West Orange, New Jersey) state that they do not use amikacin in spinal injury patients. An expert from Canada does not recommend determining serum concentrations of amikacin, but emphasizes the value of monitoring ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity. Experts from New Zealand recommend amikacin in conventional twice- or thrice-daily dosing because of the theoretical increased risk of neuromuscular blockade and apnea with larger daily doses in spinal cord injury patients. On the contrary, experts from Greece, Israel, and the U.S. recommend once-daily dosing and determining amikacin pharmacokinetic parameters for each patient. As there is considerable variation in clinical practice across spinal units and experts differ on ideal dosing and monitoring of amikacin therapy in spinal cord injury patients, there is an urgent need to develop best-practice guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Amicacina/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Monitoreo de Drogas/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Bacterianas/etiología , Formas de Dosificación , Esquema de Medicación , Testimonio de Experto , Internacionalidad , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
6.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 62(1): 74-7, 2005 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15658076

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The effect of replacing the indwelling catheter of patients suspected of having a urinary tract infection (UTI) before collecting a urine sample on the number of organisms isolated in cultures and on drug and microbiology laboratory costs was studied. METHODS: Data were collected for all patients hospitalized in two spinal cord injury (SCI) units between October 2001 and March 2002 who had an indwelling catheter or suprapubic catheter and were suspected of having a UTI. Urine samples were obtained through a port of the indwelling catheter in one SCI unit, while the indwelling catheter was replaced immediately before each urine sample was obtained in the second SCI unit. Patient demographics, history of antimicrobial use, bacterial isolate sensitivity data, and current antimicrobial treatment were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients, 41 in the control group and 44 in the intervention group, were enrolled during the six-month study period. In the control and intervention groups, 93 and 79 organisms were isolated, respectively, with an average of 2 isolates per patient in the control group and 1 per patient in the intervention group. Patients in the control group had significantly more multidrug-resistant organisms in their urine, with 34 isolated from 26 patients (63%) (p < 0.001). Changing the indwelling catheter decreased antimicrobial and microbiology laboratory costs, resulting in a cost saving of $15.64 per patient. CONCLUSION: Replacement of the indwelling catheter before collecting a urine sample for culture and conducting susceptibility testing reduced the pathogens identified, the number of toxic antimicrobials prescribed to treat the infection, and the costs of antimicrobials and microbiology laboratory technician time.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Catéteres de Permanencia/microbiología , Técnicas Microbiológicas/métodos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Infecciones Urinarias/complicaciones , Administración Oral , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/economía , Antiinfecciosos Urinarios/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos Urinarios/farmacocinética , Antiinfecciosos Urinarios/uso terapéutico , Catéteres de Permanencia/economía , Catéteres de Permanencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Esquema de Medicación , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/efectos de los fármacos , Hospitales de Veteranos , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Pacientes Internos , Técnicas Microbiológicas/economía , Técnicas Microbiológicas/tendencias , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/microbiología , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/orina , Urinálisis/métodos , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología
7.
N Engl J Med ; 351(22): 2286-94, 2004 Nov 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15525713

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: If found to be safe and immunogenic, reduced doses of influenza vaccine given by the intradermal route could increase the number of available doses of vaccine. METHODS: In an open-label study, we randomly assigned 119 subjects to receive an intradermal injection of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine, containing 6 mug of hemagglutinin for each antigen (40 percent of the usual dose), and 119 to receive an intramuscular injection of the standard dose of 15 mug of hemagglutinin for each antigen. The two groups were subdivided according to age (18 to 60 years and older than 60 years). RESULTS: Among subjects who were 18 to 60 years of age, serum antibody responses were vigorous and did not differ significantly between the intradermal and intramuscular groups, and all subjects had hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) titers of at least 1:40. Although the subjects who were older than 60 years of age also had a vigorous antibody response, there was a trend toward a better response in the intramuscular route, but this finding was significant only for antigen to the H3N2 strain. Nevertheless, 100 percent of older subjects in the intramuscular group and 93 percent of such subjects in the intradermal group had an HAI antibody titer to the H3N2 strain of more than 1:40, and 100 percent in each group had a titer of this level for both the H1N1 and B strains. Local pain was significantly more common in the intramuscular group than in the intradermal group among subjects who were 18 to 60 years of age but not among subjects who were over 60 years old. Signs of local inflammation were significantly more common among subjects in the intradermal group than among those in the intramuscular group, in both age groups. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with an intramuscular injection of full-dose influenza vaccine, an intradermal injection of a reduced dose resulted in similarly vigorous antibody responses among persons 18 to 60 years of age but not among those over the age of 60 years.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Virus de la Influenza B/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Gripe Humana/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Envejecimiento/inmunología , Femenino , Glicoproteínas Hemaglutininas del Virus de la Influenza/inmunología , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Inyecciones Intradérmicas , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
8.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 24(6): 562-6, 2004 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15555878

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk of certain patient co-morbidities and antibiotics in the development of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea (CDAD). Hospitalized patients developing CDAD during a specified period were compared with a cohort of patients, matched by age, without a diagnosis of CDAD, who were hospitalized during the same time period. Data collection included demographics, hospital ward, co-morbid conditions, antibiotics received, and mortality. Gender and age were similar in both groups. Co-morbid conditions significantly associated with the case group included cancer and COPD. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics in the case versus control group included levofloxacin, intravenous vancomycin, clindamycin, and piperacillin/tazobactam. The case group was associated with a higher mortality rate.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium/mortalidad , Diarrea/epidemiología , Diarrea/mortalidad , Quimioterapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Diarrea/microbiología , Quimioterapia Combinada/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Hospitalización , Hospitales de Veteranos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
9.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 61(18): 1895-905; quiz 1906-7, 2004 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15487879

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Wound healing, the epidemiology and staging of pressure ulcers, and pressure ulcer prevention and treatment are discussed. SUMMARY: The principal event leading to the formation of pressure ulcers appears to be a consistent interruption in blood supply to the skin. Several known risk factors exist and can be attributed to patient-specific variables and wound-specific conditions. Initial management should include removal of the source of pressure, a comprehensive assessment of the patient, and proper staging of the ulcer. Preparation of the wound for treatment is essential and can have a significant impact on healing. While the patient's nutritional status is thought to affect wound healing, only an increased protein content in the diet has been demonstrated to have a benefit. Specialized wound dressings are available for pressure ulcers of all stages and drainage characteristics. With wide variation in cost and in application regimens, a direct cost-effectiveness comparison of commercially available dressing products is difficult. Many of the growth factors commonly present in healing wounds have been synthesized and evaluated as treatments. Although topical platelet-derived growth factor has demonstrated benefit in some studies, its use remains controversial. To date, no topical growth factors carry FDA-approved labeling for use in the treatment of pressure ulcers. Human skin equivalents mark the latest advancement in therapy. Certain species of bacteria have been associated with poorly healing ulcers and may warrant intervention with either local or systemic antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSION: No pharmacologic intervention has been conclusively shown to be effective for pressure ulcers. The cornerstones of therapy remain elimination of the source of pressure or friction and appropriate wound care. usa.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Desbridamiento , Úlcera por Presión , Vendajes/efectos adversos , Humanos , Úlcera por Presión/economía , Úlcera por Presión/patología , Úlcera por Presión/terapia , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Cicatrización de Heridas
11.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 22(5): 394-405, 2003 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12792378

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Parainfluenza type 3 virus (PIV-3) infections cause lower respiratory tract illness in children throughout the world. A licensed PIV-3 vaccine is not yet available. METHODS: A live attenuated cold-adapted (ca) and temperature-sensitive (ts) PIV-3 vaccine, designated cp-45, was evaluated sequentially in open label studies in 20 adults and in placebo-controlled, double blind studies in 24 PIV-3-seropositive children, 52 PIV-3-seronegative infants and children and 49 infants 1 to 2 months old. A single dose of this intranasal vaccine was evaluated in adults [106 plaque-forming units (pfu)] and seropositive children, and 104 and 105 pfu were evaluated in seronegative children. In the infant study, two 104 pfu doses of vaccine were administered at 1- or 3-month intervals. Safety, infectivity, immunogenicity and phenotypic stability of the vaccine were evaluated in all cohorts. RESULTS: The cp-45 vaccine was well-tolerated in all age groups and infected 94% of vaccinated seronegative children and 94% of vaccinated infants. Although immunization with the first dose of cp-45 diminished the replication of a second dose in all infants, those immunized after 3 months shed vaccine virus more frequently than those immunized after 1 month (62% vs. 24%, respectively). Antibody responses to PIV-3 were readily detected in seronegative children with a variety of assays; however, the IgA response to the viral hemagglutinin-neuraminidase was the best measure of immunogenicity in young infants. Of 109 vaccine virus specimens recovered from nasal washes, 98 were ts and 11 were temperature-sensitive intermediate (tsi) viruses, with pinpoint plaques visible at 40 degrees C. tsi viruses appeared transiently at the time of peak viral replication, represented a very small proportion of the total virus shed and were not associated with changes in clinical status. ca revertants were not detected. CONCLUSIONS: The cp-45 vaccine is appropriately attenuated and immunogenic in infants as young as 1 month of age. Further development of this vaccine is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Virus de la Parainfluenza 3 Humana/inmunología , Infecciones por Respirovirus/prevención & control , Vacunas Virales/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Virales/inmunología , Factores de Edad , Anticuerpos Antivirales/análisis , Niño , Preescolar , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunidad/fisiología , Esquemas de Inmunización , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Virus de la Parainfluenza 3 Humana/genética , Fenotipo , Probabilidad , Valores de Referencia , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vacunación/métodos , Vacunas Atenuadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Atenuadas/inmunología
12.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ; 44(5): 2112-7, 2003 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12714650

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine the toxicity of various doses of intravitreal amphotericin B deoxycholate, amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC), and liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB). METHODS: Fifty-two rabbits were divided into two treatment groups (groups A and B). Thirteen treatments were administered intravitreally to the 104 rabbit eyes. Treatments included a control plus 10, 20, 30, and 50 micro g amphotericin B deoxycholate, ABLC, and L-AmB. Eye examinations were performed before injection and on day 11 for group A and on day 18 for group B. At death, on days 13 and 21 in groups A and B, respectively, vitreous humor was aspirated and concentrations of amphotericin B were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), followed by enucleation for histologic studies. RESULTS: Significantly more eyes treated with ABLC showed development of vitreal opacities than developed in eyes treated with amphotericin B deoxycholate or L-AmB (P < 0.05). Vitreal band formation was significantly higher in ABLC-treated eyes than in those treated with L-AmB, (P = 0.039). Vitreal inflammation was greater in eyes treated with L-AmB (75%), amphotericin B deoxycholate (78%), and ABLC (91%) than with the control (50%; P = 0.08). Retinal ganglion cell loss was greater in eyes treated with amphotericin B deoxycholate (81%), L-AmB (91%), and ABLC (97%) than with the control (38%; P = 0.003). Amphotericin B concentrations were measurable for all doses of the three formulations. CONCLUSIONS: Based on histologic data, increasing doses of all three agents appear to be associated with increasing toxicity, however based on ophthalmologic data, L-AmB appears to be less toxic than either amphotericin B deoxycholate or ABLC.


Asunto(s)
Anfotericina B/toxicidad , Antifúngicos/toxicidad , Ácido Desoxicólico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Desoxicólico/toxicidad , Oftalmopatías/inducido químicamente , Fosfatidilcolinas/toxicidad , Fosfatidilgliceroles/toxicidad , Cuerpo Vítreo/efectos de los fármacos , Anfotericina B/administración & dosificación , Anfotericina B/farmacocinética , Animales , Antifúngicos/administración & dosificación , Antifúngicos/farmacocinética , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión , Ácido Desoxicólico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Desoxicólico/farmacocinética , Combinación de Medicamentos , Oftalmopatías/patología , Fosfatidilcolinas/administración & dosificación , Fosfatidilcolinas/farmacocinética , Fosfatidilgliceroles/administración & dosificación , Fosfatidilgliceroles/farmacocinética , Conejos , Enfermedades de la Retina/inducido químicamente , Células Ganglionares de la Retina/efectos de los fármacos , Cuerpo Vítreo/metabolismo , Cuerpo Vítreo/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...