[Perioperative enteral nutrition]. / Nutrizione enterale perioperatoria.

Enteral nutrition, as demonstrated by the many published papers, is not only safer and cheaper than parenteral supply of nutrients, but modulates an exaggerated cytokine response related to surgical trauma that leads to an increase in intestinal permeability, bacterial translocation and infection. The aim of enteral nutrition is to reduce the impact of cytokines on surgical patients and the related infectious complications. Via the enteral route the nutrients can reach the bowel lumen where enterocytes draw upon their fuel, preserving the barrier effect and modulating the cytokine response. Parenteral supply does not achieve this target since the blood supply of nutrients is not as important as the luminal supply. It is only via the enteral supply route that we can preserve the barrier effect. Since the cytokine response sets in immediately after a trauma such as surgery, we implement uninterrupted enteral nutrition, which means before, during and after surgery, plus parenteral support till the full calorie intake is achieved. In a hepatic resection study, we have demonstrated that enteral nutrition modulates the interleukin-6 immunological response and shortens both the period to bowel movement resumption and the duration of hospital stay. Aggressive enteral nutrition has also been implemented in severe pancreatitis, allowing control of the disease without the onset of septic complications. The most important target is not to achieve full calorie intake rapidly, but to supply the enteric mucosa continuously with useful immuno-nutrients, such as glutamine and fibres, to preserve the barrier effect, the mucus layer, and immunological status of the mucosa. In this way we have obtained significant results in the surgical treatment of these patients, reducing the infection rate and hospital stay. New prospects may be,possible in the fight against surgical infections by adding probiotics to enteral nutrition in order to improve the microenvironment of the colon.

[What is new in fasting guidelines of surgical patients? Review of the literature]. / Cosa c'è di nuovo nelle linee-guida del digiuno nel paziente chirurgico? Revisione della letteratura.

The concept of perioperative starvation requires an update on a more balanced physiological bias. The old British dictum "nil by mouth from midnight" is a thing of the past. We need to administer food and fluids as early as possible both before both before and after surgery and to avoid or reduce hospital infections. Resumption of bowel movements is very rapid, and the patients are fed and experience no thirst and thus have better compliance during their hospital stay. Moreover, the social cost is reduced. A short review of the rules of various Associations of Anaesthetists both in Europe and the US shows that today the starvation time is reduced, and re-feeding after surgery is implemented early. For clear fluids a 2-h period before surgery without ingestion of clear fluids is enough, whilst in most countries a 6-h period of starvation for solid foods is the rule, but if proper distinctions are made between the various nutrients given to the patients, this time could be reduced to 2-3 hours.

[Influence of enteral nutrition on cytokine response in resective liver surgery]. / Influenza della nutrizione enterale sulla risposta citochinica in chirurgia resettiva epatica.

Postoperative infectious complications are nowadays a major problem in liver surgery. Better surgical outcomes with a consequent reduction in treatment and hospitalisation costs are a primary objective. The aim of this prospective, randomised study was to evaluate the cytokine response during and after portal clamping in patients undergoing liver resection and continuously fed with enteral nutrition as compared to patients receiving parenteral nutritional support. Forty patients with liver tumours were divided into two groups of 20 on the basis of the presence or absence of chronic liver disease. Furthermore, the latter group of 20 were randomised to two subgroups A and B of 10 patients on the basis of the different perioperative nutrition modalities. Group A patients were fed by so-called uninterrupted enteral nutrition, which means without interruption from the day before surgery with a nutritional solution delivered via a nasojejunal tube. The patients in group B were submitted to hepatic resection with parenteral nutritional support. Liver resection had to consist in resection of at least 30% of the parenchyma in non-cirrhotic patients or in segmental resection in cirrhotic ones. Ten milliliter blood samples were harvested before operation, and 10, 30 and 60 min after declamping and at 24 h. Interleukin 6 and a-tumour necrosis factor values were detected in blood samples. The values of C reactive protein and of prealbumin were recorded at 72 h postoperatively. We also evaluated postoperative complications, resumption of bowel movements, oral intake of nourishment, and patient discharge. Values in blood samples in the two groups showed a statistically significant difference in interleukin 6 values only after 24 h (10 min: group A 121 +/- 25.3, group B 156 +/- 31.4; after 24 h: group A 31.5 +/- 12, group B 105.1 +/- 24.1), while the a-tumour necrosis factor assay showed no significant difference between the two groups. However, there was an appreciably longer hospital stay (group A 10.9 +/- 3.1 days (range: 7-21 days), group B 13.2 +/- 2.7 days (range: 8-19 days) (P < 0.02) and a quicker resumption of bowel movements in group A. The data available show that uninterrupted enteral nutrition produces a modulation of the cytokine response following portal clamping. A lower cytokine activation cascade reduces the impact of the action of cytokines on the hepatic parenchyma with consequent enhancement of the hepatic Kupffer cell component. These factors thus substantially reduce the length of the patient's hospital stay and consequently the cost of medical care.