RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) was developed to provide an integrated set of tested, standardized surveys to obtain meaningful information from health plan enrollees and their experiences. Many organizations began to implement CAHPS in 1997. Formal evaluations of the experiences of three demonstration sites with implementing CAHPS (ie, process evaluations) and the impact of CAHPS on consumer's choices (ie, outcome evaluations) were conducted. This article reports on the early findings and feedback from our process evaluations about the sites' experiences with using CAHPS. Results are presented from the first round demonstration sites, including the lessons learned during the demonstrations. Our plans for future demonstrations and evaluations are included. METHODS: A similar evaluation design and instruments were used across demonstration sites. The process evaluation to monitor program intervention included on-site interviews, off-site review of documents, and focus groups with consumers. RESULTS: There are 4 early results from the CAHPS demonstrations: (1) the CAHPS survey covers topics of importance to sponsors, is of reasonable length, and can be administered quickly; (2) the report templates are being used effectively, but sponsors vary widely in their preferences for summarizing and presenting CAHPS ratings; (3) standardized or off-the-shelf products are aspects of CAHPS that sponsors value highly, while emphasizing need for further development; and (4) because surveys like CAHPS require multiple within-plan samples to make plan comparisons, they require a substantial investment and may be affordable only for large sponsors. CONCLUSION: The first round CAHPS demonstrations highlighted the strengths of the integrated surveys and the areas for improving the products and the implementation process.
Asunto(s)
Comportamiento del Consumidor , Recolección de Datos/métodos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/métodos , Seguro de Salud/normas , Recolección de Datos/normas , Toma de Decisiones , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/normas , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Kansas , New Jersey , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Estados Unidos , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality , WashingtónRESUMEN
The effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) on the interaction between the fungus Torulopsis glabrata and human neutrophils was examined. Pre-incubation of neutrophils with GM-CSF increased the neutrophil fungal killing. The cytokine also increased the oxygen-dependent respiratory burst in response to opsonized fungi, measured by the lucigenin-dependent chemiluminescence assay and superoxide release. Under the same conditions the cytokine augmented release of constituents from both specific and azurophilic granules. Besides these priming effects, GM-CSF was a weak stimulus of the neutrophil respiratory burst and degranulation. The priming and stimulatory effects of GM-CSF were observed at 10-1000 U/ml with an optimal concentration of 100 U/ml.