Effects of self-help post-myocardial-infarction rehabilitation on psychological adjustment and use of health services.

A home-based exercise programme has been found to be as useful as a hospital-based one in improving cardiovascular fitness after an acute myocardial infarction. To find out whether a comprehensive home-based programme would reduce psychological distress, 176 patients with an acute myocardial infarction were randomly allocated to a self-help rehabilitation programme based on a heart manual or to receive standard care plus a placebo package of information and informal counselling. Psychological adjustment, as assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, was better in the rehabilitation group at 1 year. They also had significantly less contact with their general practitioners during the following year and significantly fewer were readmitted to hospital in the first 6 months. The improvement was greatest among patients who were clinically anxious or depressed at discharge from hospital. The cost-effectiveness of the home-based programme has yet to be compared with that of a hospital-based programme, but the findings of this study indicate that it might be worth offering such a package to all patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Psychological factors and return to work.

Return to work is considered to be a criterion of a good outcome after a myocardial infarction or coronary revascularisation procedure. In general, return to work is not necessarily correlated with cardiac state; a variety of psychological, social and economic factors influence whether or not the individual will return to gainful employment. Psychological variables to be considered include the reactions of patient and family, their understanding of the illness, the personality and behavioural characteristics of the patient, expectations of the results of treatment and attitudes towards disability. These will be influenced by aspects of the job itself or the working environment as perceived by the patient. Physicians' attitudes are strong factors in influencing the final decision on whether or not the patient goes back to work. Employers and fellow employees, by their attitudes to the illness, will also influence the decisions. It follows that assessment and management of psychological problems must be part of total patient care after a coronary event if the optimal number of patients are to return to work, confidence of their ability to cope with its demands. Though the actual way in which assessment is made and appropriate treatment undertaken may vary considerably, a study of available knowledge enables general guidelines on these aspects to be given.

A questionnaire for assessment of the result of peptic ulcer surgery.

Details of a 22-item questionnaire used to assess the result of surgery for peptic ulcer are given. Tested in 47 patients the questionnaire correlates well with the Visick grading. The 100-mm line test and post-operative alkali consumption are less accurate measures of outcome. As an alternative to the Follow-Up Clinic, as a potential predictor of result, and as an indicator of the quality of life, the questionnaire has much to offer.

Anxiety after a heart attack.

An objective measurement of anxiety at defined intervals after the onset of acute cardiac symptoms was made in 203 men admitted to the Coronary Care Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, and in 83 patients in a Teesside coronary survey. Of the Teesside patients, 50 were treated at home, 22 were admitted initially to a coronary care unit, and 11 were admitted directly to a general medical ward. In the Edinburgh patients the level of anxiety was high early in the illness, fell rapidly, and rose again towards the end of their stay in hospital. At 4 months it was that of a normal population. After transfer from the coronary care unit the group was not more anxious than other patients in the ward. Reaction to the illness was unrelated to its physical severity. Patients who reacted badly at the beginning were less likely to return to work. The pattern of anxiety in the Teesside patients resembled that of the Edinburgh group, and reaction to illness was largely independent of physical aspects. Treatment in hospital, either through a coronary care unit initially or in a medical ward, did not increase emotional distress. At 3 months patients treated initially in a coronary care unit were less anxious than the others. Throughout the period of study the Teesside patients were more anxious than the Edinburgh patients and outcome was not related to anxiety. Social and environmental differences may account for this.

Patient's assessment of the result of surgery for peptic ulcer.

The assessment of the result of surgery for peptic ulcer is based on doctor-determined criteria. Failure to distinguish one operation as being better than another may be because these criteria do not include the patient's rating of outcome. A questionnaire based on patients' descriptions of the quality of result has been tested in 63 patients. Preliminary figures show that success in the opinion of the patient does not necessarily mean absence of symptoms, while failure is due more to psychosocial than physical factors. A logical step in the planning of controlled trials is preoperative control of admission to the trial.