RESUMEN
AIM: We compared Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping by direct sequencing of the non-structural 5b region (NS5b) and a commercial PCR/hybridization method based on the conserved 5´-untranslated region (5'UTR). METHODS: One hundred twenty HCV containing plasma samples were analyzed by NS5b sequencing with focus on samples with undetermined results or 1b subtype identification in the used combination of Cobas® AmpliPrep/Cobas® TaqMan96® PCR and subsequent Versant® HCV Genotype 2.0 Assay (LiPA). RESULTS: There was 100% concordance between the two methods for genotyping but only 83% for subtyping. Seventeen samples were designated 1b by hybridization but subtype 1a by NS5b sequencing. This is a general 5'UTR problem as the discordant results were additionally confirmed by 5'UTR sequencing. Thus our routine combination not only misclassified 38.6% of subtype 1a isolates as 1b but in contrast to NS5b sequencing was unable to discriminate between subtypes 2a/c, or 4a/c/d and also failed on a newly described subtype (10a/3k). [corrected]. CONCLUSIONS: [corrected] The applied 5'UTR methods allow the rapid determination of HCV genotypes but failed to correctly identify the subtype in many samples. This has implications for epidemiological studies or forensic evaluation of chains of infection and NS5b sequencing therefore is our method of choice under those circumstances.
Asunto(s)
Regiones no Traducidas 5'/genética , Técnicas de Genotipaje/métodos , Hepacivirus/genética , Hibridación Genómica Comparativa/métodos , Genotipo , Humanos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN/métodosRESUMEN
Usually, therapeutic decisions in patients with acute chest pain are based on the 12-lead electrocardiogram because ST-segment elevation is highly specific for myocardial infarction, but the presence of pacing-induced repolarization changes makes electrocardiogram interpretation difficult. The authors report an acute myocardial infarction patient with ventricular paced rhythm successfully treated by thrombolytic therapy. The aim of this work aims to highlight the difficulty with electrocardiographic diagnosis and timely treatment of myocardial infarction in the presence of ventricular pacing.
Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Marcapaso Artificial , Terapia Trombolítica , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently observed after open-heart surgery, following discharge from the cardiac surgery clinic. Compared to those usually reported in the early postoperative period, this arrhythmia is delayed in onset and is often a cause of re-hospitalization. Post-discharge AF has never been characterized in the literature. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed post-discharge AF occurring within 30 days of coronary artery bypass graft or of valvular procedures in 376 patients referred to an early postoperative rehabilitation program. To investigate the probability of the persistence of post-discharge AF, we prospectively examined 232 patients who had undergone valvular procedures. RESULTS: An arrhythmia was recognized in 61/376 patients (16%), resulted in worsening of the NYHA functional class in 27 (44%) and in life-threatening hemodynamic effects requiring urgent cardioversion in 5 (8%). Events were predicted by the occurrence of postoperative AF (6-fold higher risk), left ventricular hypertrophy, an enlarged left atrium and valvular pathology (3-fold) and by the lack of beta-blocker protection (5-fold). AF persisted in 20/232 (9% of the study population, 18% of patients who had post-discharge AF) and had a relevant impact on the patient's clinical status. Predictors of events were older age, an enlarged left atrium and a lower left ventricular ejection fraction. CONCLUSIONS: Post-discharge AF following open-heart surgery is frequent in patients undergoing valvular procedures and often persists over time. The clinical impact of the arrhythmia is relevant, it might cause re-hospitalizations in many circumstances and, consequently, may have an impact on hospital resources. Events are much less frequent in patients taking beta-blockers than in those who do not, and they can be predicted by simple variables observed in the early stages after surgery.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/etiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/complicaciones , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/rehabilitación , Causalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent complication following cardiac surgery. It occurs mostly between the second and fourth postoperative days and often recurs within 30 days after surgery. While postoperative AF has been well analyzed, post-discharge recurrences of AF have not been clearly described even if they are reported as a frequent cause of re-hospitalization. METHODS: We followed up 185 patients for 10 +/- 5 months with the aim of characterizing the post-discharge recurrences of AF. All patients had recently undergone cardiac surgery complicated by AF and were in sinus rhythm at the time of admission to our Center. We also compared the efficacy of the main prophylactic regimens adopted in the referral Centers (amiodarone, beta-blockers, amiodarone plus beta-blockers) during the first postoperative month. RESULTS: In the first postoperative month AF recurred after discharge in 60 patients. The event rate was not different in patients treated with amiodarone and controls (47 vs 50%, p = NS), while it was significantly lower in patients taking beta-blockers either alone or associated with amiodarone (10 and 9% respectively, p = 0.002). At the end of follow up (10 +/- 5 months), AF persisted in 3 out of 176 study patients (1.7%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, post-discharge recurrences of AF are frequent during the first postoperative month and have a clinical relevance. Beta-blockers (not amiodarone) seem to be an effective prophylactic measure. The phenomenon tends to vanish in the long term, and a chronic prophylaxis is not justified.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Amiodarona/uso terapéutico , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
Patients with ischemic heart disease are often affected by a mixed hyperlipoproteinemia, where a hypercholesterolemia of various severity is accompanied by slight or moderate hypertriglyceridemia (type IIb dyslipidemia). Current epidemiologic evidence suggests that hypertriglyceridemia has not to be disregarded, particularly in certain subgroups of patients. We evaluated the effect of the association of simvastatin 10 mg/day [an hydroxymethyl-glutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor] and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n3-PUFA) in comparison with simvastatin 10 mg/day alone. The subjects undergoing the study were affected by coronary artery disease and showed hypercholesterolemia (LDL-cholesterol > 160 mg/dl) and moderate hypertriglyceridemia (serum triglycerides 200-400 mg/dl) after 2 months of moderate dietary therapy for hyperlipidemia (Step 1 of the National Cholesterol Education Program [NCEP]). Thirty-nine patients were randomized to have 1 of 2 scheduled treatments. At the same time the patients underwent severe dietary therapy for hyperlipidemia (Step 2 of the NCEP). After 3 months of treatment, total-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides were significantly lower than basal values in both groups (p < 0.05). Total-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides were lower in the group treated with n3-PUFA and simvastatin compared to simvastatin alone. However, only for triglycerides was the difference significant (-39.99% in patients treated with n3-PUFA and simvastatin versus -25.65% in patients treated with simvastatin alone, particularly in the first group of 35.85%; p < 0.05). With regard to HDL-cholesterol, the differences between the basal values and the 2 groups of treatments were non significant. Remarkable side effects were not observed in the 2 groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)