Updating process of internal models of action as assessed from motor and postural strategies in children.

The objective of this study was to investigate the updating process of internal models of action in children and young adults, through the postural and motor strategies adopted in simple tasks, namely sit-to-stand (STS) and back-to-sit (BTS). To this end, 11 healthy children from 7 to 10years (latest stage of childhood) and 12 healthy adults participated in the experiment. The STS and BTS tasks were performed with horizontal support surface and support surface tilted 10° to the right or forward in order to investigate the immediate adaptation of the internal representations of the movement. Movement variables that included the durations of STS and BTS and the amplitudes of the trunk movement were computed. Postural characteristics were also considered during the transition from STS to BTS, including the trunk orientation and the head stabilization strategies. Despite certain similarities with adults, especially in terms of the asymmetry of the performance times for the two tasks (STS vs. BTS) and the partial movement adaptations, the children were less able than adults to adapt both postural and movement controls to the new support conditions. Thus, it appears that the updating of internal models of action is a process that matures slowly throughout ontogenesis.

Extreme short-term environmental constraints do not update internal models of action as assessed from motor imagery in adults.

According to the simulation theory, the internal simulation of a movement (imagined movement, IM) and its execution (actual movement, AM) are based on the same motor representations. The brain uses these representations for controlling action. The specific objective of this study was to investigate the updating process of internal models of action in adults, through massive environmental changes involved by microgravity (0G). 0G has multiple effects on motor control, including short-term adaptations with respect to the planification and performance of actions. However, the effects of 0G on internal representations of action are still largely unknown. To address this issue, thirteen subjects performed first sit-to-stand (STS) and back-to-sit (BTS) tasks, and subsequently had to imagine movement performance in these tasks. The tasks were performed under normogravity (1G) and 0G conditions. Based on durations of actual and IMs, two main results emerged from this study. In 1G, actual and IM's durations were similar. However, in 0G, AM durations were significantly longer than IM durations. Furthermore, IM durations in 0G were similar to the 1G value. These results show that although the planification and execution of action were immediately adapted to the 0G condition, the storage of afferent information was inadequate to recalibrate the predictive model. These results suggest that sudden change in gravity was not considered for updating internal models of action, and that forward model probably required more practice in order to integrate the modification of the sensorial feedback generated by the new environmental constraints.