Validation of the PROMIS sleep disturbance item bank computer adaptive test (CAT) in patients on renal replacement therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the validity and reliability of the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Item Bank Computer Adaptive Test (PROMIS-SD CAT) in patients on renal replacement therapy, using the Insomnia Severity Index as the primary legacy instrument. METHODS: Cross-sectional sample of adults on renal replacement therapy completed PROMIS-SD CAT, Insomnia Severity Index, General Anxiety Disorder-7, Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised Renal, SF-12 questionnaires. Construct validity was confirmed by associations with legacy instrument scores and measures of emotional wellbeing. Test-retest and scale reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient and standard errors of measurement, respectively. Discrimination was assessed using receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Among 217 participants (133 kidney transplant recipients, 84 on dialysis), 15% had moderate/severe sleep disturbance (Insomnia Severity Index ≥15). PROMIS-SD CAT exhibited good test-retest (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89, 95% confidence interval (0.83-0.93)) and scale (>0.9 for T-scores 34-73) reliability. PROMIS-SD CAT T-scores were strongly correlated with Insomnia Severity Index (rho = 0.85, 95% confidence interval (0.81-0.88)), Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised Renal Sleep Item (rho = 0.75, 95% confidence interval (0.69-0.81)) and moderately with General Anxiety Disorder-7 scores and SF-12 Mental Component Summary scores (p < 0.001 for all). PROMIS-SD CAT demonstrated outstanding discrimination for moderate/severe insomnia (defined as Insomnia Severity Index ≥15) (AUROC 0.93, 95% confidence interval (0.88, 0.98)). PROMIS-SD CAT and Insomnia Severity Index measurement characteristics were qualitatively similar between patients on dialysis and kidney transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: These results support PROMIS-SD CAT's validity and reliability for research and as potential screening tool among patients on renal replacement therapy.

Pretransplant Patient Education in Solid-organ Transplant: A Narrative Review.

Education for pretransplant, solid-organ recipient candidates aims to improve knowledge and understanding about the transplant process, outcomes, and potential complications to support informed, shared decision-making to reduce fears and anxieties about transplant, inform expectations, and facilitate adjustment to posttransplant life. In this review, we summarize novel pretransplant initiatives and approaches to educate solid-organ transplant recipient candidates. First, we review approaches that may be common to all solid-organ transplants, then we summarize interventions specific to kidney, liver, lung, and heart transplant. We describe evidence that emphasizes the need for multidisciplinary approaches to transplant education. We also summarize initiatives that consider online (eHealth) and mobile (mHealth) solutions. Finally, we highlight education initiatives that support racialized or otherwise marginalized communities to improve equitable access to solid-organ transplant. A considerable amount of work has been done in solid-organ transplant since the early 2000s with promising results. However, many studies on education for pretransplant recipient candidates involve relatively small samples and nonrandomized designs and focus on short-term surrogate outcomes. Overall, many of these studies have a high risk of bias. Frequently, interventions assessed are not well characterized or they are combined with administrative and data-driven initiatives into multifaceted interventions, which makes it difficult to assess the impact of the education component on outcomes. In the future, well-designed studies rigorously assessing well-defined surrogate and clinical outcomes will be needed to evaluate the impact of many promising initiatives.