Prenatal diagnosis in the first trimester of pregnancy.

UNLABELLED: In the past 2 decades, the second trimester of pregnancy has been the most common time for prenatal diagnosis of fetal anomalies and chromosomal aneuploidies. More recently, screening for and diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities are increasingly being performed in the first trimester. With improvements and technological advances in ultrasound, it is now possible to identify many fetal structural anomalies at 11 to 13 6/7 weeks' gestation. At 10 to 11 weeks' gestation, biochemical markers in serum-PAPP-A, free beta-hCG, AFP, and uE3-combined with sonographic measurement of nuchal translucency and the presence/absence of the nasal bone can achieve a Down syndrome detection rate of 97.5% at a false-positive rate of 5%. Structural anomalies of the central nervous system, and the cardiac, renal, and gastrointestinal tracts can now be diagnosed by either transabdominal or transvaginal scanning, achieving detection of up to 80% of CNS anomalies by 13 weeks' gestation. In future, the emphasis in prenatal diagnosis will likely be in the first trimester. TARGET AUDIENCE: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After completion of this article, the reader should be able to explain the rationale for first trimester combined ultrasound and serum analyte screening for fetal Down syndrome, describe the fetal anatomic structures that can be seen and evaluated in the first trimester, provide patient counseling about the relative benefits of genetic amniocentesis versus chorionic villous sampling, and discuss the application of Doppler technology to the evaluation of a first trimester fetus.

Massive postpartum haemorrhage as a cause of maternal morbidity in a large tertiary hospital.

All cases of massive PPH (defined as estimated blood loss > 1500 ml within 24 hours of delivery) were identified from the obstetric database of the unit for the period 1997-2001 (inclusive). The casenotes of the patients were retrieved and various variables collected for analyses. Over the 5-year period, there were 145 cases of massive PPH of the 27,106 deliveries; an incidence of five per 1000 deliveries (0.5%). Most (42%) of the women were nulliparous and 12 (8%) had four or more previous deliveries. There was associated antepartum haemorrhage in 12 (8%) cases, five of which were placental abruptions. Risk factors identified to be associated with massive PPH included prolonged labour, emergency caesarean section (CS) for failure to progress, especially in the second stage (34), and placenta praevia (10). Four women had an abdominal hysterectomy. Massive PPH remains an important cause of severe maternal morbidity; risk factors, which are independent of parity, include CS in the late first stage or second stage and previous CS (irrespective of parity). A high index of suspicion is necessary for these cases, as timely intervention is more likely to minimise the complications and its consequences.

Risk of uterine rupture following induction of labour in women with a previous caesarean section in a large UK teaching hospital.

To determine the outcome of induction of labour for women who had had previous caesarean sections, we identified all women who had induction of labour at the Leicester Royal Infirmary between January 1994 and September 2001. During the study period, there were 43,175 deliveries and 8761 inductions of labour (20.3%). Of these, 5047 (57.6%) were induced with prostaglandins and 138 women in this group had a previous caesarean section but eight were excluded from the analysis because of induction for early intrauterine death (five) and late terminations for fetal anomalies (three). The remaining 130 women formed the study group. Induction of labour resulted in spontaneous vaginal delivery in 50% of cases, with 11% requiring instrumental delivery and 39% had caesarean sections. There were no cases of uterine rupture in this series. We conclude that prostaglandins are safe for inducing labour in women with previous caesarean sections, but should be administered with caution.

Factors affecting outcome of colposuspension.

A prospective follow-up study of 196 women who underwent a colposuspension operation for genuine stress incontinence (GSI) at the Leicester General Hospital between June 1991 and May 1996 (inclusive) was carried out to review the outcome of surgery. The outcome was based on clinical symptomatology, demonstration of stress incontinence in the clinic and limited postoperative urodynamic studies. The clinical cure rate was 91.33%. Continence rate was reduced by age above 70 years and post-operative urinary tract infections, and not affected by previous colposuspension, or anterior colporrhaphy. On the other hand, previous colposuspension, previous pelvic floor operations and urinary tract infections caused a significantly higher incidence of voiding problems. Older women and those who have had previous bladder neck surgery need special attention in assessment, counselling and in choice of surgery. Reducing postoperative urinary tract infections might help improve the overall outcome of the operation.

Knowledge of Down syndrome in pregnant women from different ethnic groups.

The uptake of any screening test is influenced by knowledge of the condition being screened for. In the present study, the knowledge and the source of knowledge of women offered antenatal screening for Down syndrome (DS) was assessed by means of a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire was administered to 300 consecutive women booking for antenatal care, of the 245 (82%) women who completed and returned the questionnaire, 117 (48%) were Caucasian, 85 (35%) were Asian born outside the UK, 32 (13%) were Asian born in the UK and ten (4%) belonged to other categories. Only 30% of the cohort had a good understanding of the condition. Racial groups other than Caucasian had a poorer understanding of DS. The factors which affected knowledge of DS included quality of spoken English, knowing an affected child, parity and religion. The most significant factor affecting acceptance of screening was the woman's knowledge of DS. The source of information for the condition varied widely: 42% from a general practitioners (GP), 24% from the hospital and 16% from midwives. The proportion with good knowledge was similar in those women whose source of information was the GP (45%) and the midwife (41%). These proportions were, however, higher (though not significantly) when the source of information was from magazines and newspapers (67%) and from friends (53%). Uptake of the screening test was best in those with good knowledge (53%) compared to those with poor knowledge (23%) (p<0.02). Between 28% and 66% (depending on the ethnic group) of women had a screening blood test "allegedly" without knowing why it had been performed. In order to improve uptake of the screening test for DS there is need for better education and counselling of women attending for antenatal care.

Practice observed: is speculum examination on admission a necessary procedure in the management of all cases of antepartum haemorrhage?

The objective of the study was to determine the justification or otherwise of admission speculum examination in women presenting with antepartum haemorrhage and the outcome/ benefits of the practice on women with antepartum haemorrhage presenting to the delivery suite of a UK teaching hospital. Factors studied included gestational age at presentation, associated factors with the bleeding, grade of medical/ midwifery staff performing the admission speculum examination, findings on speculum examination and ultrasound scan and the overall pregnancy outcome. Of the 564 (4.9%) women who presented with antepartum haemorrhage; 521 had an admission speculum examination; 94.4% of these were by senior house officers (SHOs). The findings were a normal cervix (69%) and ectopy (21.3%). Of the women, 14.4% had recurrent bleeding and 8.5% went into preterm labour. The complications of the pregnancies, timing of delivery and management were independent of speculum examination. Admission speculum examination did not influence the management of pregnancies and the complications thereafter. These results suggest that such an intrusive procedure may not be justifiable in women presenting with antepartum haemorrhage.

Postoperative urinary tract infections (UTIs) following single-dose intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in colposuspension patients.

The records of 196 women who underwent colposuspension for genuine stress incontinence at the Leicester General Hospital, England, between June 1991 and May 1996 were reviewed for evidence of urinary tract infection (UTI). Variables analyzed include age, type of antibiotic, timing of a positive culture, organism(s) responsible and antibiotic sensitivity. Forty-six patients (23.47%) developed urinary infection; of these, 42 had received single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis with suprapubic catheterization. Thirty-two (76%) of those who developed UTI received augmentin (amoxycillin and clavulanic acid), whereas 10 (24%) were given cefuroxime and metronidazole. Positive cultures were obtained between postoperative days 3 and 28, with a mean of 9.6 days, and 81% occurred after the 7th day. Coliform organisms were responsible for nearly 70% of the infections. UTI is still common after colposuspension, despite single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis. Further studies looking at longer or alternative courses of antibiotics or clean intermittent self-catheterization are essential to establish the best way of curbing UTI in urogynecology patients.