RESUMEN
Depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and substance abuse are linked to higher rates of morbidity and mortality after various surgical procedures. Comparable data in general surgery are lacking. Records from 183 consecutive patients undergoing elective general surgery procedures at a single tertiary hospital were reviewed. Patients with depression, anxiety, PTSD, and substance abuse or any combination of these at the time of surgery were classified as having "active mental illness" (AMI). Thirty-day complications, readmissions, and emergency room (ER) visits were identified. Univariate analysis was performed followed by creation of multivariate regression models. 41.5 per cent (n = 76) met criteria for the AMI group and 58.5 per cent (n = 107) were without a mental illness (WAMI). The two groups had similar incidence of medical comorbidities and similar mean values of serum albumin and creatinine. The AMI group had higher rates of readmissions (14.5 vs 3.7 %, P = 0.009) and ER (19.7 vs 8.4 %, P = 0.025) visits compared with the WAMI group. Differences in length of stay and 30-day complications did not reach statistical significance. In patients undergoing elective general surgery, depression, anxiety, PTSD, and substance abuse are associated with higher rates of readmission and ER visits. These results suggest a need for further research on the impact of specific mental illnesses on postoperative complications.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/psicología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/complicaciones , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Análisis de Varianza , Ansiedad/complicaciones , Comorbilidad , Depresión/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/complicaciones , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/complicaciones , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Introduction Prediction of mortality and morbidity in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is too complex for practical use and may not be accurate. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the CDH Study Group equation and Score of Neonatal Acute Physiology Perinatal Extension (SNAPPE) II score to predict short-term outcomes of newborns with CDH. Materials and Methods Fifty-two neonates were admitted with CDH at Children's Hospital of Michigan from November 2001 to July 2009. Retrospective chart analysis was performed. Predicted survival rates were calculated using the equation published by the CDH Study Group in 2001. SNAPPE II scores were also obtained within 12 hours of admission. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical package. Results Thirty out of 52 (58%) neonates survived to discharge. SNAPPE II score was significantly lower (p < 0.0001) in survivors (20 ± 15) versus nonsurvivors (41 ± 16). When neonates were stratified according to the CDH Study Group, low-risk patients had a survival rate of 68% (predicted 84%), moderate-risk patients had a survival rate of 43% (predicted 57%), and high-risk patients had a survival rate of 33% (predicted 36%). A total of 83% of the newborns who survived were operated within 48 hours of life, while only 17% of the nonsurvivors were operated within 48 hours of life. Conclusion SNAPPE II scores were better predictors of mortality than the CDH Study Group equation published in 2001. Further exploration is warranted to evaluate validity of survival advantage for those who were operated within 48 hours of life. A future study of combination of prenatal and postnatal factors may help in improved outcomes of the newborns with CDH.
Asunto(s)
Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/mortalidad , Tamizaje Neonatal/métodos , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/cirugía , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Michigan/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Current concepts in the management of hepatic metastases have changed dramatically over the past two decades. Multidisciplinary therapies including chemotherapy, surgery, and regional therapy have alone and in combination significantly improved the survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Conditions that were previously considered hopeless and treated merely for palliation can now be approached with curative intent. In this paper, we review the surgical treatment for colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) and describe a paradigm-shift in the management of complex heretofore-considered unresectable CRLM. Utilizing advanced multidisciplinary treatment strategies has improved the prognosis of patients with stage IV colorectal cancer to the point where we may question whether CRLM are now a chronic disease.