Saliva swabs are the preferred sample for Omicron detection

The Omicron variant is characterised by more than 50 distinct mutations, the majority of which are located in the spike protein. The implications of these mutations for disease transmission, tissue tropism and diagnostic testing are still to be determined. We evaluated the relative performance of saliva and mid-turbinate swabs as RT-PCR samples for the Delta and Omicron variants. The positive percent agreement (PPA) of saliva swabs and mid-turbinate swabs to a composite standard was 71% (95% CI: 53-84%) and 100% (95% CI: 89-100%), respectively, for the Delta variant. However, for the Omicron variant saliva and mid-turbinate swabs had a 100% (95% CI: 90-100%) and 86% (95% CI: 71-94%) PPA, respectively. This finding supports ex-vivo data of altered tissue tropism from other labs for the Omicron variant. Reassessment of the diagnostic testing standard-of-care may be required as the Omicron variant become the dominant variant worldwide.

Improved performance of saliva for the detection of the B.1.351 variant in South Africa

Assessment of the unknown performance of saliva for the detection of the novel SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern (VOC) B.1.351 (501Y.V2) lineage is essential as saliva has been shown to be an equivalent, less invasive and a less costly alternative to nasopharyngeal swabs for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pre-variant studies. Between 1st August 2020 and 16th January 2021, we enrolled 410 eligible ambulatory participants who presented to Groote Schuur Hospital (GSH) in Cape Town, South Africa for SARS-CoV-2 testing. Of these, 300 were enrolled prior to, and 110 after, the initial detection and replacement of wild-type by the B.1.351 variant. All participants provided a supervised self-collected mid-turbinate (MT) and saliva (SA) swab, in addition to the standard HCW collected NP swab which were all tested by RT-PCR in an accredited diagnostic laboratory. Positive percent agreement to NP swab for SA swabs pre- and post-variant were 51.5% and 72.5% respectively while these values for MT swabs were 75.8% and 77.5%. The negative percent agreement for all swab types during all periods was >98%. The basis for this marked improvement of SA swabs as a diagnostic sample for B.1.351 virus is still being investigated.