Ovarian serous borderline tumor with mural nodules of anaplastic carcinoma and omental involvement: A case report.

Mural nodules are rarely identified in cystic ovarian neoplasms, and have been categorized into sarcoma-like, sarcomatous, and anaplastic carcinomatous types. Most reports of these mural nodules have been described in mucinous ovarian tumors. In this case report, we describe an ovarian serous borderline tumor with mural nodules composed of high-grade carcinoma with anaplastic features and necrosis, including the morphologic features, immunoprofile, and results of tumor DNA sequencing. Omental involvement was also identified. Recognition of this phenomenon in serous tumors is important, so that thickened areas of cyst wall in ovarian serous tumors will be thoroughly examined.

Isolated Flat Epithelial Atypia on Core Biopsy Specimens Is Associated With a Low Risk of Upgrade at Excision.

OBJECTIVES: We present a retrospective review of 111 breast core biopsy specimens with flat epithelial atypia (FEA) and corresponding excision to better understand rates of upgrade following this diagnosis. METHODS: In total, 252 breast core biopsy specimens were identified. Cases were excluded if biopsy slides or excision results were unavailable, for ipsilateral carcinoma or other findings warranting excision, or biopsy performed for indications other than mammographically detected calcifications. Coincident atypical lobular hyperplasia was not excluded. Diagnoses were confirmed by breast pathologists, and mammographic images were reviewed. RESULTS: Ultimately, 111 biopsy specimens with FEA were included. In subsequent excisions, one (1%) of 111 showed invasive carcinoma, 20 (18%) atypical ductal hyperplasia, 20 (18%) lobular neoplasia, 31 (28%) FEA, and 39 (35%) no atypical findings. CONCLUSIONS: FEA on core biopsy specimens is associated with a low rate of upgrade to invasive carcinoma. Close follow-up may be a reasonable alternative to excision for isolated FEA on core needle biopsy specimens.

Effects of Hydrochloric Acid and Formic Acid Decalcification on Breast Tumor Biomarkers and HER2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization.

Biomarker analysis of metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC) is routinely recommended by ASCO/CAP guidelines, and establishing a diagnosis of MBC often requires immunohistochemistry (IHC). The reliability of breast tumor biomarkers and breast-specific markers on decalcified tissues has not been extensively studied. We performed IHC studies on breast tumors exposed to hydrochloric acid (HCl) and formic acid (FA) decalcification solutions, and HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization on a subset of these tumors to establish a protocol for handling bone specimens with suspicion for MBC. Fifteen fresh cases of primary breast carcinoma and 8 HER2+ paraffin-embedded core biopsy cases were studied. Fresh tissue was divided into 5 fragments to approximate a bone core biopsy. One fragment (control) was fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. The remaining fragments were also exposed to FA or HCl decalcification for 1 or 5 hours. All fragments were embedded in 1 block and tested with an IHC panel. The known HER2+ cases were exposed to either 1 or 5 hours of FA, and HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization was also performed. Results were interpreted as follows: H-scores for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and GATA-3 were assigned from 0 to 300; HER2, cytokeratin 7, gross cystic disease fluid protein-15, Pax-8, TTF-1, cytokeratin 20, and mammaglobin were scored from 0 to 3+; and Ki67 from 0% to 100%. Mean scores were compared using the t test or Wilcoxon test for paired samples. No significant differences in mean score were seen between NF and 1 hour FA for any IHC immunoreactivity. After 5 hours of FA, only Ki67 average score was significantly less than NF. Mean scores for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2, Ki67, and GATA-3 were significantly lower than NF in the tissue after either 1 or 5 hours of HCl. Mean scores for gross cystic disease fluid protein-15, mammaglobin, and cytokeratin 7 staining were not significantly lower than NF after 1 or 5 hours of HCl.

Breast Cancers With Magee Equation Score of Less Than 18, or 18-25 and Mitosis Score of 1, Do Not Require Oncotype DX Testing: A Value Study.

Objectives: To investigate use of Magee equations (MEs) to determine which breast cancer cases can be excluded from Oncotype DX testing. Methods: A prospective value study was carried out using data from pathology reports. Results: If all three MEs scores were less than 18 or 31 or higher, the cases were labeled do not send for testing. If any or all scores were 18 to 25, cases were labeled do not send if mitosis score was 1. Of the total 205 cases, 146 (71%) were labeled do not send; of these, the correct call was made in 143 (98%) cases. Two of the three discordant cases had associated nontumor factors, likely resulting in higher scores. Conclusions: Cases with ME scores less than 18, or 18 to 25 and mitosis score 1, do not require Oncotype DX testing, an estimated saving of US$280,000 per 100 clinical requests.

High Fidelity of Breast Biomarker Metrics: A 10-Year Experience in a Single, Large Academic Institution.

PURPOSE: Recommendations for standardization of breast biomarkers including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) led to the creation of American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines to provide continuous guidance. Included in these recommendations is the "ongoing assay assessment procedures." We report these biomarker metrics as there is a dearth of published information on this topic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ER, PR, and HER2 positivity rates of all newly diagnosed, recurrent, and metastatic invasive breast cancers on core biopsies, and repeated testing on resection specimen by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were collected from April 1, 2008 to December 31, 2017. RESULTS: The positivity rates of ER, PR, and HER2 over almost 10 years of monitoring showed high fidelity. Total ER-positive rate was 83.6% (81.4% to 86.8%), ER+/PR+ was 71.7% (68.6% to 75.5%), ER+/PR- was 17.6% (11.0% to 15.0%), ER-/PR- was 16.0% (13.5% to 18.2%), and ER-/PR+ was 0.6% (0.2% to 1.0%). The HER2-positive rate was 13.7% (10.2% to 17.4%) including 9.9% (7.3% to 11.9%) by IHC and 3.8% (1.9% to 5.9%) by FISH reflexed from IHC 2+ results. FISH amplification rate of HER2 IHC 2+ cases was 11.0% (5.8% to 19.2%). Annual quality-assurance check for HER2 IHC/FISH percent positive and percent negative agreement (as defined by Food and Drug Administration) was 96% to 100%. CONCLUSIONS: This longitudinal active assessment of 9564 breast biomarker cases shows the achievement of high fidelity of breast biomarker results when following the ASCO/CAP guidelines. Continuous monitoring of breast biomarkers may minimize assay analytical drift and assure quality clinically relevant results.

Low Estrogen Receptor (ER)-Positive Breast Cancer and Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy: Is Response Similar to Typical ER-Positive or ER-Negative Disease?

OBJECTIVES: Pathologic complete response (pCR) rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was compared between 141 estrogen receptor (ER)-negative (43%), 41 low ER+ (13%), 47 moderate ER+ (14%), and 98 high ER+ (30%) tumors. METHODS: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive cases, cases without semiquantitative ER score, and patients treated with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy alone were excluded. RESULTS: The pCR rate of low ER+ tumors was similar to the pCR rate of ER- tumors (37% and 26% for low ER and ER- respectively, P = .1722) but significantly different from the pCR rate of moderately ER+ (11%, P = .0049) and high ER+ tumors (4%, P < .0001). Patients with pCR had an excellent prognosis regardless of the ER status. In patients with residual disease (no pCR), the recurrence and death rate were higher in ER- and low ER+ cases compared with moderate and high ER+ cases. CONCLUSIONS: Low ER+ breast cancers are biologically similar to ER- tumors. Semiquantitative ER H-score is an important determinant of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Prognostic Significance of Modified Residual Disease in Breast and Nodes (mRDBN) Algorithm After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that prognostic accuracy of the residual disease in breast and lymph nodes (RDBN) method, which is calculated using residual tumor size, nodal involvement, and tumor grade, may be improved by incorporating residual tumor cellularity. METHODS: Cases included 614 patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Tumor size was adjusted for residual cellularity of invasive carcinoma and used to calculate modified RDBN (mRDBN) and compared with unmodified gross tumor size (gRDBN). RESULTS: RDBN could be calculated in 428 cases. Relative risks of recurrence and death were significantly higher for RDBN-3 and RDBN-4 compared with RDBN-1. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant differences in disease-free survival and overall survival for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative and ER-positive/HER2-negative subgroups (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Both mRDBN and gRDBN provide prognostic information, particularly in HER2-negative carcinoma; however, mRDBN showed better stratification of RDBN-3 and RDBN-4 patients.

An exploratory study of host polymorphisms in genes that clinically characterize breast cancer tumors and pretreatment cognitive performance in breast cancer survivors.

PURPOSE: Inspired by the hypothesis that heterogeneity in the biology of breast cancers at the cellular level may account for cognitive dysfunction symptom variability in survivors, the current study explored relationships between host single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 25 breast cancer-related candidate genes (AURKA, BAG1, BCL2, BIRC5, CCNB1, CD68, CENPA, CMC2, CTSL2, DIAPH3, ERBB2, ESR1, GRB7, GSTM1, MELK, MKI67, MMP11, MYBL2, NDC80, ORC6, PGR, RACGAP1, RFC4, RRM2, and SCUBE2), identified from clinically relevant prognostic multigene-expression profiles for breast cancer, and pretreatment cognitive performance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The sample (n=220) was comprised of 138 postmenopausal women newly diagnosed with early stage breast cancer and 82 postmenopausal age- and education-matched healthy controls without breast cancer. Cognitive performance was assessed after primary surgery but prior to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy using a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological tests encompassing eight cognitive function composite domains: attention, concentration, executive function, mental flexibility, psychomotor speed, verbal memory, visual memory, and visual working memory. In total, 131 SNPs were included in the analysis. Standard and robust multiple linear regression modeling was used to examine relationships between each domain and the presence or absence of one or more minor alleles for each SNP. Genetic risk/protection scores (GRSs) were calculated for each domain to evaluate the collective effect of possession of multiple risk/protective alleles. RESULTS: With the exception of CMC2, MMP11, and RACGAP1, significant (P<0.05) SNP main effect and/or SNP by future prescribed treatment group interactions were observed for every gene between at least one domain and one or more SNPs. All GRSs were found to be significantly (P<0.001) associated with each respective domain score. CONCLUSION: Associations between host SNPs and computed GRSs and variability in pretreatment cognitive function performance support the study hypothesis, and warrant further investigations to identify biomarkers for breast cancer-related cognitive dysfunction.

Immunohistochemical profile of breast cancer with respect to estrogen receptor and HER2 status.

There are a few studies that have evaluated a panel of stains on a single large data set of breast cancers, which is required for direct comparison between antibodies. The immunohistochemical panel in this study was chosen to include breast-specific markers and markers that are expressed in tumors resembling breast cancer. The individual marker positivity in decreasing order was 95% (177/186) for GATA-3, 92% (172/186) for cytokeratin (CK)7, 80% (151/189) for AR, 80% for estrogen receptor (158/198), 69% for progesterone receptor (137/198), 55% (105/190) for NY-BR-1, 52% (99/189) for mammaglobin, 31% (59/191) for vimentin, 26% (51/195) for GCDFP-15, 0.5% (1/186) for CK20, and 0% (0/188) for PAX-8. When tumors were categorized based on estrogen receptor and HER2 status; a total of 45 profiles were identified. In addition, some tumors showed an unconventional profile-although the majority of breast carcinomas were CK7-positive/CK20-negative, a CK7-negative/CK20-negative profile was seen in ∼8% of the cases. Such a profile can create confusion in investigation of a carcinoma of unknown origin. The results define the individual sensitivity of each marker and establish a baseline diagnostic profile of breast cancer in a large data set. In addition, the results support the use of immunohistochemical panel for confirming or determining breast as the source of metastasis.

Semiquantitative GATA-3 immunoreactivity in breast, bladder, gynecologic tract, and other cytokeratin 7-positive carcinomas.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate GATA-3 immunohistochemical expression semiquantitatively in breast, gynecologic, gastric, pancreatic-biliary tract, urothelial, and vulvar/cervical squamous cell carcinomas. METHODS: GATA-3 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 198 invasive breast carcinomas on tissue microarrays. Tissue microarrays of other tissues included 144 gynecologic tumors, 28 bladder carcinomas, 63 cholangiocarcinomas, 20 pancreatic carcinomas, and 62 gastric carcinomas. Full tissue sections of 10 invasive squamous cell carcinomas were also stained. GATA-3 expression was semiquantitatively scored using an H-score method. H-score greater than 10 was considered a positive result. RESULTS: Of 186 breast carcinomas, 95% were positive (mean H-score of 217). GATA-3 expression was uncommon in 139 nonsquamous gynecologic tumors, with often weak reactivity (mean H-score <50) seen in 18% of endocervical, 7% of endometrial, and 10% of ovarian tumors. Six (60%) of 10 squamous cell carcinomas expressed GATA-3 (mean H-score of 102). Of 22 urothelial carcinomas, 95% expressed GATA-3 (mean H-score of 170). A few cholangiocarcinomas (3%), pancreatic adenocarcinomas (10%), and gastric carcinomas (2%) weakly expressed GATA-3 (mean H-score <50). CONCLUSIONS: Strong GATA-3 expression is a reliable marker of primary breast carcinoma in the appropriate clinical context. GATA-3 reactivity in around 70% of triple-negative breast carcinomas is also clinically useful. Significant reactivity in gynecologic squamous cell carcinomas suggests that GATA-3 alone cannot reliably distinguish these tumors from urothelial carcinoma.