COVID-19 and celiac disease: a review.

The aim of this review is to broadly cover how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected individuals with celiac disease, including perceived risk, risk of contraction or severe infection, considerations regarding vaccination, access to gluten-free food during the pandemic, and possible long-term changes to the practice of celiac disease management spurred by the pandemic. While initially there was increased perceived risk about COVID-19 in the celiac disease population, studies have found that individuals with celiac disease are not at an increased risk of contracting or having a severe course compared to the general population. There is not yet evidence that COVID-19 infection will lead to an increase in celiac disease incidence, though more research on this topic with longer-term follow-up is necessary to make this determination. Limited access to in-person visits led to an increase in telemedicine, which was adopted swiftly by this patient population and may offer improved access in the long term. In summary, individuals with celiac disease do not appear to be at an increased risk of contracting COVID-19 or having a more severe disease course.

Implementation of Electronic Decision Support for Diabetic Care in a Student-Run Clinic.

Background and objectives Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a complex disease that can lead to complications. Electronic decision support in the electronic medical record (EMR) aids management. There is no study demonstrating the effectiveness of electronic decision support in assisting medical student providers in student-run free clinics. Methods There were 71 T2DM patients seen by medical students. Twenty-three encounters used a Diabetes Progress Note (DPN) that was created from consensus, opinion-based guidelines. Each note received a total composite score based on an eight-point scale for adherence to guidelines. Statistical comparisons between mean composite scores were performed using independent t-tests. Results The mean total composite score of DPN users was significantly greater than DPN non-users (5.35 vs. 4.23, p = 0.008), with a significant difference in the physical exam component (1.70 vs. 1.31, p = 0.002). Conclusions In this exploratory study, medical student providers at an attending-supervised, student-run free clinic that used electronic decision support during T2DM patient visits improved adherence to screening for diabetic complications and standard of care.