Best's macular dystrophy in Australia: phenotypic profile and identification of novel BEST1 mutations.

PURPOSE: (1) To evaluate the spectrum of BEST1 mutations within Australian Best Disease or vitelliform macular dystrophy (VMD) pedigrees, including any novel mutations; (2) to analyse the range of clinical presentations of this cohort; (3) to determine any possible genotype-phenotype correlations and (4) to compare clinical data of patients with phenotypic VMD, both with and without a BEST1 mutation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with suspected VMD were referred to clinical centres for ophthalmological assessment and genetic screening. When a mutation was identified in a proband, further family members were invited for clinical and genetic screening. RESULTS: We identified 42 patients with one of 13 BEST1 mutations. Seven mutations were novel. There were a further 14 probands in whom a BEST1 mutation was not identified. Median visual acuity in both VMD (mutation positive) and clinical VMD (no BEST1 mutation identified) groups reached driving standards (6/12 or better). CONCLUSION: We did not identify any firm genotype-phenotype correlations in our Australian VMD pedigrees, in which there was a spectrum of BEST1 mutations and marked variation in clinical presentation. Genetic screening remains the gold standard for VMD diagnosis. Patients should be counselled that visual acuity might remain at or above driving standards in at least one eye even in the presence of a BEST1 mutation.

The natural history of OPA1-related autosomal dominant optic atrophy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Autosomal dominant optic atrophy (ADOA) is a genetically heterogenous disease. However, a large proportion of this disease is accounted for by mutations in OPA1. The aim of this longitudinal study was to investigate disease progression in Australian ADOA patients with confirmed OPA1 mutations. METHODS: Probands with characteristic clinical findings of ADOA were screened for OPA1 mutations, and relatives of identified mutation carriers were invited to participate. Disease progression was determined by sequential examination or using historical records over a mean of 9.6 (range 1-42) years. RESULTS: OPA1 mutation carriers (n = 158) were identified in 11 ADOA pedigrees. Sixty-nine mutation carriers were available for longitudinal follow-up. Using the right eye as the default, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVAR) remained unchanged (defined as visual acuity at or within one line of original measurement) in 43 patients (62%). BCVAR worsened by 2 lines in 13 patients (19%). BCVAR deteriorated by more than 2 lines in six patients (9%). Ten per cent of patients had an improvement in visual acuity. Mean time to follow-up was 9.6 years with the mean visual acuity being 6/18 for both the initial and subsequent measurements. There was no statistical significance in the rate of BCVAR loss across different OPA1 mutations (p = 0.55). CONCLUSION: OPA1-related ADOA generally progresses slowly and functional visual acuity is usually maintained. Longitudinal disease studies are important to enable appropriate counselling of patients. This study enables a better understanding of the natural history of ADOA.

The role of the Met98Lys optineurin variant in inherited optic nerve diseases.

AIMS: To investigate the role of the common OPTN Met98Lys variant as a risk allele in open-angle glaucoma (OAG), autosomal dominant optic atrophy (ADOA) and Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON). METHODS: The presence of the Met98Lys variant was determined in a total of 498 (128 with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG)) patients with OAG, 29 patients who had myocilin-related OAG, 101 patients from ADOA pedigrees, 157 patients from LHON pedigrees and 218 examined OAG age-matched normal controls. RESULTS: 17 of 218 (7.8%) controls had the Met98Lys variant. 28 (5.6%) patients with OAG were Met98Lys positive. More Met98Lys carriers were found in the NTG group than in the high-tension glaucoma (HTG) group (p = 0.033). However, no significant difference was observed between the NTG and control cohorts (p = 0.609). Two MYOC mutation carriers were found to have the variant. The variant was found in 1 of 10 pedigrees with ADOA and in 8 of 35 pedigrees with LHON. CONCLUSION: Data from this study do not support a strong role for the OPTN Met98Lys variant in glaucoma, ADOA or LHON. However, a weak association was observed of the variant with NTG compared with that with HTG. Meta-analysis of all published data on the variant and glaucoma confirmed that the association, although weak, is highly statistically significant in the cohort with glaucoma versus controls.

The telomere of human chromosome 1p contains at least two independent autosomal dominant congenital cataract genes.

AIMS: Multiple genetic causes of congenital cataract have been identified, both as a component of syndromes and in families that present with isolated congenital cataract. Linkage analysis was used to map the genetic locus in a six generation Australian family presenting with total congenital cataract. METHODS: Microsatellite markers located across all known autosomal dominant congenital cataract loci were genotyped in all recruited family members of the Tasmanian family. Both two point and multipoint linkage analysis were used to assess each locus under an autosomal dominant model. RESULTS: Significant linkage was detected at the telomere of the p arm of chromosome 1, with a maximum two point LOD of 4.21 at marker D1S507, a maximum multipoint exact LOD of 5.44, and an estimated location score of 5.61 at marker D1S507. Haplotype analysis places the gene inside a critical region between D1S228 and D1S199, a distance of approximately 6 megabases. The candidate gene PAX7 residing within the critical interval was excluded by direct sequencing in affected individuals. CONCLUSION: This is the third report of congenital cataract linkage to 1ptel. The critical region as defined by the shared haplotype in this family is clearly centromeric from the Volkmann cataract locus identified through study of a Danish family, indicating that two genes causing autosomal dominant congenital cataract map to the telomeric region of chromosome 1p.

Analysis of clinical outcomes following in-hospital adult cardiac arrest.

AIMS: The outcome of in-hospital resuscitation following cardiac arrest depends on many factors related to the patient, the environment and the extent of resuscitation efforts. The aim of the present study was to determine predictors of successful resuscitation and survival to -hospital discharge following in-hospital cardiac arrest and to assess functional outcomes of survivors (cerebral performance scores). METHODS: Medical records of adult patients sustaining in-hospital cardiac arrest between June 2001 and January 2003 were reviewed. Successful resuscitation was defined as the return of spontaneous circulation at the completion of resuscitative efforts, irrespective of degree of inotropic/vasopressor support. Thirty demographic and clinical variables were analysed to determine predictors of successful resuscitation and in-hospital survival. RESULTS: In 105 patients with cardiac arrest, 46 patients (44%) were successfully resuscitated and 22 (21%) survived to hospital discharge. Predictors of successful resuscitation included a primary cardiac admission diagnosis, monitoring at the time of the arrest, a longer duration of resuscitation and the absence of the need for endotracheal intubation. Patients with ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation were more likely to survive to hospital discharge than those with asystolic or pulseless electrical activity (45 vs 12 vs 20%, P = 0.01). The sole independent predictor of survival to hospital discharge was the absence of the need for endotracheal intubation (odds ratio 0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.88, P < 0.01). The majority of survivors (73%) had normal cerebral performance scores. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of predictors of successful resuscitation following cardiac arrest is important for risk stratification. Ongoing appraisal of in-hospital cardiac arrests through a multicentre registry could improve clinical outcomes.