Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 22(7): 1197-1205, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27040394

RESUMEN

Busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (BuCyE) is a commonly used conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). This multicenter, phase II study examined the safety and efficacy of BuCyE with individually adjusted busulfan based on preconditioning pharmacokinetics. The study initially enrolled Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients ages 18 to 80 years but was amended due to high early treatment-related mortality (TRM) in patients > 65 years. BuCyE outcomes were compared with contemporaneous recipients of carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Two hundred seven subjects with HL (n = 66) or NHL (n = 141) were enrolled from 32 centers in North America, and 203 underwent ASCT. Day 100 TRM for all subjects (n = 203), patients > 65 years (n = 17), and patients ≤ 65 years (n = 186) were 4.5%, 23.5%, and 2.7%, respectively. The estimated rates of 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) were 33% for HL and 58%, 77%, and 43% for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL; n = 63), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL; n = 29), and follicular lymphoma (FL; n = 23), respectively. The estimated rates of 2-year overall survival (OS) were 76% for HL and 65%, 89%, and 89% for DLBCL, MCL, and FL, respectively. In the matched analysis rates of 2-year TRM were 3.3% for BuCyE and 3.9% for BEAM, and there were no differences in outcomes for NHL. Patients with HL had lower rates of 2-year PFS with BuCyE, 33% (95% CI, 21% to 46%), than with BEAM, 59% (95% CI, 52% to 66%), with no differences in TRM or OS. BuCyE provided adequate disease control and safety in B cell NHL patients ≤ 65 years but produced worse PFS in HL patients when compared with BEAM.


Asunto(s)
Busulfano/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Etopósido/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Linfoma/terapia , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Busulfano/farmacocinética , Busulfano/uso terapéutico , Carmustina/uso terapéutico , Citarabina/uso terapéutico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/mortalidad , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/mortalidad , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/terapia , Humanos , Linfoma/mortalidad , Linfoma no Hodgkin/mortalidad , Linfoma no Hodgkin/terapia , Melfalán/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , América del Norte , Análisis de Supervivencia , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/mortalidad , Trasplante Autólogo
4.
Ann Pharmacother ; 39(10): 1752-4, 2005 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16131538

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of massive blast infiltration of the liver by acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) manifested by worsening liver function test (LFT) results and concern over how to dose chemotherapy in this patient. CASE SUMMARY: A 36-year-old male presenting with productive cough, abdominal pain, and lower back pain was diagnosed with pre-B cell ALL. Of note, the patient developed worsening LFT results within the first few days of diagnosis. Because of concern over increasing liver dysfunction and the need to administer vincristine and daunorubicin with induction therapy, a transvenous liver biopsy was performed, revealing massive lymphoblast infiltration. DISCUSSION: A short course of prednisone was given to determine whether the LFT abnormalities would reverse with treatment. Once a downward trend in the abnormalities was noted, full-dose induction chemotherapy was administered. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to discern the cause of elevated LFT values in patients with acute leukemia who require induction chemotherapy, as this may affect treatment decisions and patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Hígado/fisiopatología , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Daunorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Daunorrubicina/efectos adversos , Daunorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hígado/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas de Función Hepática , Masculino , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/fisiopatología , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/efectos adversos , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Vincristina/administración & dosificación , Vincristina/efectos adversos , Vincristina/uso terapéutico
5.
Semin Oncol ; 30(6 Suppl 18): 76-83, 2003 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14727245

RESUMEN

Oral mucosal ulceration is a frequent complication in bone marrow transplantation, resulting from epithelial injury caused by cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiation conditioning, as well as from pre-existing infection. Oral mucositis causes pain, interferes with patient nutrition, and can lead to systemic infection and other complications that increase patient morbidity and mortality; this complication also markedly increases the expense of bone marrow transplantation. A variety of interventions have been assessed for preventing oral mucositis or reducing the severity of mucositis and its sequelae. These include meticulous pretransplantation and ongoing mouth care, calcium phosphate solution, near-infrared light and lower-energy laser treatment, interleukin-11, sucralfate, oral glutamine, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor rinse, tretinoin, and keratinocyte growth factor; particularly promising results have been observed with use of the cytoprotectant/radioprotectant agent amifostine. Reduction in the severity and duration of oral mucositis and its sequelae in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation can have a substantial impact on morbidity and mortality and cost of care. Further systematic evaluation of approaches to prevention and management of oral mucositis is necessary to define optimal strategies in the transplantation setting.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Médula Ósea/efectos adversos , Estomatitis/etiología , Estomatitis/prevención & control , Amifostina/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/economía , Humanos , Mucosa Bucal , Protectores contra Radiación/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , Estomatitis/economía , Estomatitis/epidemiología , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...