The LOCalizer Radiofrequency Identification System: An Effective New Technology for Localizing Non-Palpable Breast Lesions for Surgery.

Background. Breast screening has decreased morbidity and mortality due to detection of early, non-palpable breast cancers. One of the challenges of performing breast-conserving surgery on non-palpable breast tumours is accurate localization of the cancer. We aimed to perform a feasibility study to examine the outcomes associated with the introduction of a novel radiofrequency identification system (RFID) called LOCalizer as an alternative to traditional wire-guided localization. Methods. Data were prospectively collected on all patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery using the LOCalizer RFID system in a regional cancer centre between July 2019 and March 2020. Patients had a RFID tag placed preoperatively and underwent surgical removal of the tag with the index lesion guided by a handheld LOCalizer probe. The primary aim was successful placement and retrieval of the RFID tag. Re-excision rates, specimen size, specimen weight, cancer subtype and complication rate were all recorded. Results. Sixty-nine patients aged between 50 and 69 years had a LOCalizer tag inserted between July 2019 and March 2020. Of these, 6 (8.7%) were diagnostic and 63 (91.3%) were therapeutic. There was no migration of RFID tags, and all tags were retrieved with the index lesion. The overall re-excision of margin rate was 17.4% (12/69). All re-excision of margins was due to positive radial margins. The overall complication rate was 1.4% with one grade 1 Clavien-Dindo morbidity. Conclusion. The LOCalizer RFID is an effective and safe wire-free localization method for non-palpable breast lesions.

Invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast with large central acellular zones (ring carcinoma): imaging and clinical findings in eight cases.

OBJECTIVE: To review the mammographic and ultrasound appearances in patients who have invasive ductal carcinoma with a central acellular zone (ring carcinoma), as this feature has been reported to be associated with a poorer outcome. MATERIALS: Eight patients were identified with ring carcinomas. Two breast radiologists reviewed their mammograms and ultrasound images. Patient records were reviewed to assess outcome. RESULTS: All patients had lesions deep within the breast, adjacent to the chest wall, five lesions were incompletely visualised on mammography. The appearance was of a circumscribed or obscured mass, without microcalcification. Five patients had ultrasound demonstrating a solid well-circumscribed hypoechoic microlobulated lesion. CONCLUSION: In our series of patients who have a ring carcinoma of the breast, mammographic and ultrasound appearances were similar in all cases and lacked the typical features of malignancy.

Idiopathic benign breast calcification.

A 56-year-old woman who came in for screening mammography was found to have extensive unilateral calcification of her left breast which had developed since her previous screening mammogram. The calcification had a ductal and lobular appearance. Possible known etiologies are discussed, but these do not explain the appearance in this case, implying that the cause is idiopathic.