Philemon and Baucis syndrome: three additional cases of double deaths of married couples.

The simultaneous death of two people is immediately considered as a suspect. However, this feeling is reinforced when the individuals are spouses. In these situations, criminal and forensic investigations are required to establish whether or not the deaths were homicidal in nature. Despite many descriptions of simultaneous deaths being present in the literature, the simultaneous death of two spouses from natural causes is poorly described with Ciesiolka et al., Department of Legal Medicine in Gießen (Germany), being the only ones to have reviewed two case reports involving these circumstances. The scarcity of this type of information in the literature renders the task of claiming natural simultaneous death as the final outcome of an investigation difficult. We would like to report three additional cases with the aim of better describing this type of event. In all three cases, the bodies were those of a married couple in their 80s. The bodies were discovered in the same room. In each case, the death of one of the spouses could be attributed to natural cause; however the death of the other spouse could not be determined with certainty, and shared several similarities in all cases: simultaneity in death; a pre existing cardiovascular disease/disorder; a certain degree of fragility and dependence on the other spouse whose death could lead to acute psychological stress. Intense psychological disorder could trigger acute coronary or rhythmic disorders. The mechanisms by which brain activity influences cardiac electrophysiology are now known to take place via the autonomic nervous system mediation. This brain activity could provide an explanation for the death of the individuals with pre-existing heart conditions, who underwent significant stress upon occurrence of the death of their partners. The death of these individuals, which took place at the same place and time as their deceased spouses, can be attributed to natural causes: the Philemon and Baucis syndrome.

[Organ procurement in forensic deaths]. / Prélèvements d'organes et décès médico-légaux.

OBJECTIVE: There is a chronic shortage of transplants. There are many obstacles on organ procurement and some are related to forensics aspects of deaths. In these situations in France, the judge decides whether or not to perform the organ recovery. These refusals are about 40 donors per year, representing a loss of more than 120 potential transplants. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of 9 years (2003-2011) aimed to study the expectations of judges in comparing them with forensics issues. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two cases of organ recovery with judicial proceedings have been treated in collaboration between the Agency of Biomedicine (Northeast) and the Medico-Legal Institute of Lille (northern France). RESULTS: When there is a judicial opposition to an organ procurement, it is mostly upon criminal circumstances (57%). The main reason is the need to perform an autopsy (38%), raising fears of a loss of evidence because of resuscitation and surgery for the judges. However, autopsies rule out these problems if strict protocols are followed. CONCLUSIONS: In case of forensic death, French law provides that a forensic examination to take place prior to surgical procedures. The law also provides for collaboration between caregivers and medical examiners. Nevertheless, judicial oppositions persist and appear to belong to a lack of communication between actors (judges/medical examiners/organ procurement organization). Better collaboration through protocols must be thought to satisfy the demands of justice and public health.