Influence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors on Aortic Wall Motion After Repair of Type A Aortic Dissection: An Electrocardiography-Gated Computed Tomography Study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate size changes of the thoracic aorta during the cardiac cycle with dynamic computed tomographic angiography (CTA) at specific anatomic landmarks in patients who previously underwent ascending aorta repair because of type A dissection, and to correlate aortic wall motion with several cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: From December 2008 to December 2010, 18 patients (14 men and 4 women, mean age 64 ± 12 years) with previous aortic repair underwent electrocardiography-gated CTA follow-up. Aortic systolic and diastolic diameter and cross-sectional area were measured at 4 levels: 1 cm proximal (level A) and 1 (B), 3 (C), and 10 cm (D) distal to the origin of the left subclavian artery. RESULTS were assessed according to age and presence of diabetes, hypertension, and smoking. RESULTS: This morpho-functional evaluation of aortic wall motion demonstrated a significant influence (P < 0.05) of hypertension at level A and D and diabetes at level D. Smoking had a borderline significance at level C and D. No significant correlation with age was evident, with results not significantly different in patients ≤ 55 and > 55 years. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking, diabetes, and hypertension play a role in impairing aortic size variations. These variations might predict wall structural alterations due to cardiovascular risk factors before they become morphologically evident. This might influence timing of surveillance following repair of acute dissection, allowing it to be specifically tailored for any single subject.

Root replacement with stentless Freestyle bioprostheses for active endocarditis: a single centre experience.

OBJECTIVES: Few studies have examined the use of stentless Freestyle bioprostheses in patients with active valve endocarditis (VE). The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of stentless Freestyle bioprostheses in patients undergoing full-root replacement. METHODS: From February 2000 to June 2010, 180 patients with VE underwent cardiac surgery at our institution, of which 71 (39.5%) had prosthetic VE. Eighteen patients underwent full-root replacement with Freestyle bioprostheses: 3 patients (16%) had native aortic VE, 14 (78%) had aortic prosthetic VE and 1 (6%) had mitral and aortic prosthetic VE. Mean age was 66.7 ± 10.1, M/F: 6/12, mean logistic EuroSCORE 36.4 ± 21.6. Eight patients (42%) underwent concomitant procedures (two mitral valve replacements, three ascending aorta replacements, one coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), one ventricular septal disease (VSD) repair, one CABG + ascending aorta + VSD repair). RESULTS: Two patients (11%) died in-hospital. At the median follow-up of 24 months (range 1-113 months), no death occurred and freedom from reoperation was 87.5% (2 patients for aortic root pseudo-aneurysm at 1 and 23 months). All patients are in NYHA functional class I and have satisfactory echocardiographic data (EF 54.3 ± 8%, peak and mean trans-prosthetic gradients 12 ± 6.7 mmHg and 7.5 ± 3.6 mmHg) with 100% freedom recurrence of VE. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that root replacement with Freestyle stentless bioprostheses in patient with VE, is associated with low rates of early and mid-term mortality, good haemodynamic performance and low rates of valve-related morbidity as well as low recurrence of infection.

The ideal theoretical graft oversizing in valve-sparing aortic operations with a standard tubular or a Valsalva graft.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine, by a mathematical model, the ideal theoretical degree of ascending aortic graft oversizing needed to obtain normal sinuses dimension in the reimplantation type of valve-sparing aortic operations. METHODS: To define a normal-range value, size of sinuses of Valsalva was conventionally expressed as the area surrounding fully opened aortic cusps, the so-called beyond leaflets area (BLA), and measured in 50 healthy subjects. A mathematical relationship between aortic annulus diameter, aortic sinuses diameter and resulting BLA was defined. By simulating intra-operative scenarios, the effect of different degrees of a standard or Valsalva graft oversizing on BLA extension was tested. RESULTS: The same degree of graft oversizing resulted in a bigger beyond leaflets area for the Valsalva graft than for a standard graft. Oversizing degrees exceeding +7mm for a standard graft and +3mm for the Valsalva graft resulted in a beyond leaflets area over normal limits. Results were expressed in a visual form as two different normograms, one for the standard graft and one for the Valsalva graft. CONCLUSIONS: A less pronounced graft oversizing is needed to achieve normal-range sinuses size when using a Valsalva graft, the ideal theoretical graft oversizing was +7mm for a standard graft and +3mm for the Valsalva graft, our normograms can be helpful in selecting a proper graft size when performing a valve-sparing aortic procedure.