Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 29(2): 469-472, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35607285

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Memantine is used for neurocognitive protection in patients undergoing cranial radiotherapy for central nervous system tumors and is reported to be well-tolerated. CASE REPORT: Presented is a case of memantine-induced altered mental status requiring an intensive care unit admission. An 18-year-old male with relapsed, progressive medulloblastoma presented with severe altered mental status shortly after the first fraction of palliative whole brain radiotherapy. At the time, the patient was on day five of memantine therapy, which had been prescribed to reduce neurocognitive toxicity risk. MANAGEMENT & OUTCOME: Memantine was withheld while dexamethasone, valproate, and morphine were continued for headache. Approximately 50 h after admission, the patient's confusion significantly improved. Evaluation of acute altered mental status was unrevealing, including but not limited to negative urinary toxicology screen and lack of disease progression on imaging. Whole brain radiotherapy was resumed after a two-day cessation and he was discharged home after four days with complete resolution of symptoms. DISCUSSION: Clinicians should be aware of and consider the risk of altered mental status with memantine, given the increased utilization and upcoming clinical trials in pediatric patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Neoplasias Cerebelosas , Meduloblastoma , Masculino , Humanos , Adolescente , Niño , Meduloblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Meduloblastoma/radioterapia , Memantina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Irradiación Craneana/efectos adversos , Irradiación Craneana/métodos
3.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 44(4): e859-e865, 2022 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35235547

RESUMEN

Children with cancer and those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation frequently require anesthesia for imaging as well as diagnostic and therapeutic procedures from diagnosis through follow-up. Due to their underlying disease and side effects of chemotherapy and radiation, they are at risk for complications during this time, yet no published guideline exists for preanesthesia preparation. A comprehensive literature review served as the basis for discussions among our multidisciplinary panel of oncologists, anesthesiologists, nurse practitioners, clinical pharmacists, pediatric psychologists, surgeons and child life specialists at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Due to limited literature available, this panel created an expert consensus guideline addressing anesthesia preparation for this population.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Neoplasias , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Niño , Consenso , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Humanos , Neoplasias/terapia
4.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 18(3): e412-e419, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34705478

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a very common side effect of pediatric cancer therapy. High-quality, evidence-based, pediatric-specific guidelines for prophylaxis and treatment of CINV are available. At many centers, guideline-concordant care is uncommon. We formed a multidisciplinary quality improvement team to implement guideline-concordant care for CINV prophylaxis at our center. We present the results following the first year of our interventions. METHODS: We planned and implemented a multipronged approach in three key phases: (1) developing and publishing an acute CINV prophylaxis pathway, (2) education of providers, and (3) updating the computerized provider order entry system. We used iterative, sequential Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and behavioral economic strategies to improve adherence to guideline-concordant CINV prophylaxis. We focused on aprepitant usage as a key area for improvement. RESULTS: At the beginning of the study period, < 50% of patients were receiving guideline-concordant CINV prophylaxis and < 15% of eligible patients were receiving aprepitant. After 1 year, more than 60% of patients were receiving guideline-concordant care and 50% of eligible patients were receiving aprepitant. CONCLUSION: We describe the development and implementation of a standardized pathway for prevention of acute CINV in pediatric oncology patients. With a multidisciplinary, multifaceted approach, we demonstrate significant improvements to guideline-congruent CINV prophylaxis.


Asunto(s)
Antieméticos , Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias , Antieméticos/farmacología , Antieméticos/uso terapéutico , Aprepitant/efectos adversos , Niño , Humanos , Náusea/inducido químicamente , Náusea/tratamiento farmacológico , Náusea/prevención & control , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Vómitos/inducido químicamente , Vómitos/tratamiento farmacológico , Vómitos/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...