RESUMEN
Background and Aims: Multiple diabetes care guidelines have called for the personalization of risk factor goals, medication management, and self-care plans among older patients. Study of the implementation of these recommendations is needed. This study aimed to test whether a patient survey embedded in the Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR), coupled with telephonic nurse care management, could engage patients in personalized goal setting and chronic disease management. Methods: We conducted a single-center equal-randomization delayed comparator trial at the primary care clinics of the University of Chicago Medicine from 2018.6 to 2019.12. Patients over the age of 65 years with type 2 diabetes with an active patient portal account were recruited and randomized to receive an EHR embedded goal setting and preference survey immediately in the intervention arm or after 6 months in the delayed intervention control arm. In the intervention arm, nurses reviewed American Diabetes Association recommendations for A1C goals based on health status class, established personalized goals, and provided monthly telephonic care management phone calls for a maximum of 6 months. Our primary outcome was the documentation of a personalized A1C goal in the EHR. Results: A total of 100 patients completed the trial (mean age, 72.51 [SD, 5.22] years; mean baseline A1C, 7.14% [SD, 1.06%]; 68% women). The majority were in the Healthy (59%) followed by Complex (30%) and Very Complex (11%) health status classes. Documentation of an A1C goal in the EHR increased from 42% to 90% (p < 0.001) at 6 months in the intervention group and from 54% to 56% in the control group. Across health status classes, patients set similar A1C goals. Conclusions: Older patients can be engaged in personalized goal setting and disease management through an embedded EHR intervention. The clinical impact of the intervention may differ if deployed among older patients with more complex health needs and higher glucose levels. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03692208.
RESUMEN
Background: Prediction models are being increasingly used in clinical practice, with some requiring patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The optimal approach to collecting the needed inputs is unknown. Objective: Our objective was to compare mortality prediction model inputs and scores based on electronic health record (EHR) abstraction versus patient survey. Methods: Older patients aged ≥65 years with type 2 diabetes at an urban primary care practice in Chicago were recruited to participate in a care management trial. All participants completed a survey via an electronic portal that included items on the presence of comorbid conditions and functional status, which are needed to complete a mortality prediction model. We compared the individual data inputs and the overall model performance based on the data gathered from the survey compared to the chart review. Results: For individual data inputs, we found the largest differences in questions regarding functional status such as pushing/pulling, where 41.4% (31/75) of participants reported difficulties that were not captured in the chart with smaller differences for comorbid conditions. For the overall mortality score, we saw nonsignificant differences (P=.82) when comparing survey and chart-abstracted data. When allocating participants to life expectancy subgroups (<5 years, 5-10 years, >10 years), differences in survey and chart review data resulted in 20% having different subgroup assignments and, therefore, discordant glucose control recommendations. Conclusions: In this small exploratory study, we found that, despite differences in data inputs regarding functional status, the overall performance of a mortality prediction model was similar when using survey and chart-abstracted data. Larger studies comparing patient survey and chart data are needed to assess whether these findings are reproduceable and clinically important.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients' perspectives and social contexts are critical for prevention of hospital readmissions; however, neither is routinely assessed using the traditional history and physical (H&P) examination nor commonly documented in the electronic health record (EHR). The H&P 360 is a revised H&P template that integrates routine assessment of patient perspectives and goals, mental health, and an expanded social history (behavioral health, social support, living environment and resources, function). Although the H&P 360 has shown promise in increasing psychosocial documentation in focused teaching contexts, its uptake and impact in routine clinical settings are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and impact on care planning of implementing an inpatient H&P 360 template in the EHR for use by fourth-year medical students. METHODS: A mixed methods study design was used. Fourth-year medical students on internal medicine subinternship (subI) services were given a brief training on the H&P 360 and access to EHR-based H&P 360 templates. Students not working in the intensive care unit (ICU) were asked to use the templates at least once per call cycle, whereas use by ICU students was elective. An EHR query was used to identify all H&P 360 and traditional H&P admission notes authored by non-ICU students at University of Chicago (UC) Medicine. Of these notes, all H&P 360 notes and a sample of traditional H&P notes were reviewed by two researchers for the presence of H&P 360 domains and impact on patient care. A postcourse survey was administered to query all students for their perspectives on the H&P 360. RESULTS: Of the 13 non-ICU subIs at UC Medicine, 6 (46%) used the H&P 360 templates at least once, which accounted for 14%-92% of their authored admission notes (median 56%). Content analysis was performed with 45 H&P 360 notes and 54 traditional H&P notes. Psychosocial documentation across all H&P 360 domains (patient perspectives and goals, mental health, expanded social history elements) was more common in H&P 360 compared with traditional notes. Related to impact on patient care, H&P 360 notes more commonly identified needs (20% H&P 360; 9% H&P) and described interdisciplinary coordination (78% H&P 360; 41% H&P). Of the 11 subIs completing surveys, the vast majority (n=10, 91%) felt the H&P 360 helped them understand patient goals and improved the patient-provider relationship. Most students (n=8, 73%) felt the H&P 360 took an appropriate amount of time. CONCLUSIONS: Students who applied the H&P 360 using templated notes in the EHR found it feasible and helpful. These students wrote notes reflecting enhanced assessment of goals and perspectives for patient-engaged care and contextual factors important to preventing rehospitalization. Reasons some students did not use the templated H&P 360 should be examined in future studies. Uptake may be enhanced through earlier and repeated exposure and greater engagement by residents and attendings. Larger-scale implementation studies can help further elucidate the complexities of implementing nonbiomedical information within EHRs.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Laminoplasty is an established treatment for cervical myelopathy. Multiple variations have emerged, many advocating the use of allograft, but controversy persists. OBJECTIVE: To assess medium-term clinical outcomes in patients who underwent laminoplasty with autograft at our institution. METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients (19 male, 13 female, average age 66 yr) from our prospective outcome registry that underwent cervical laminoplasty between 2009 and 2013 were reviewed. Computed tomography (CT) scan was performed immediately postoperatively and at 6-mo follow-up. Parameters included patient perception of outcome, Nurick score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analog scale for neck pain, and SF-36. RESULTS: On retrospective analysis, all patients felt improved at 3 mo postoperatively; at 2 yr, this rate was 91%. Improvements were seen in Nurick scores, from 3.16 ± 0.9 preoperatively to 1.94 ± 0.8 at 2 yr; NDI score from 28.7% ± 9% preoperatively to 20.8% ± 9.6% at 2 yr; visual analog scale from 2.8 ± 1.2 preoperatively to 1.7 ± 0.9 at 2 yr; and SF-36 physical component summary from 27.9 ± 10 preoperatively to 37.8 ± 11.9 at 2 yr. All values reached significance at all follow-up points ( P < .05) with the exception of 6-mo NDI values ( P = .062). No C5 palsy, graft complications, or reclosure was observed in any patient during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Laminoplasty with autograft is a safe and effective method to treat cervical myelopathy, with good medium-term clinical outcome. No reclosures were observed. Bony fusion was seen in all cases on CT scan. Our study found good outcomes in the performance of open-door laminoplasty without hardware, in the treatment of cervical stenosis.
