The potential role of local pharmacies to assess asthma control: an Italian cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Asthma control and monitoring still represents a challenge worldwide. Although the international guidelines suggest the interplay between secondary and primary care services as an effective strategy to control the disease, community pharmacies' are seldom involved in asthma control assessment. The present cross-sectional study aimed at providing a picture of the relationship between asthma severity and control in community pharmacies within the health district of the city of Verona (Veneto Region, North-Eastern Italy). METHODS: A call for participation was launched through the Pharmacists' Association of Verona. Patients referring to the participating pharmacies with an anti-asthmatic drug medical prescription and an asthma exemption code were asked to complete the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and a brief questionnaire collecting information on their age, sex, smoking status, aerobic physical exercise and usual asthma therapy, which also defined asthma severity. A multinomial logistic regression model was fitted to investigate the risk of uncontrolled as well as poorly controlled vs. controlled asthma (base). Results were expressed as relative risk ratios (RRR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI). RESULTS: Fifty-seven community pharmacies accepted to participate and 584 asthmatic patients (54% females; mean-age: 51 ± 19 years) were consecutively recruited from 1st January to 30th June 2018 (6 months). Based upon ACT score 50.5% patients had a controlled asthma, 22.3% a poorly controlled and 27.2% uncontrolled. A variable proportion of patients with uncontrolled asthma were observed for every level of severity, although more frequently with mild persistent form of asthma. Most patients (92%) self-reported regular compliance with therapy. At multinomial regression analysis, patients under regular asthma treatment course (RRR = 0.33; 95%CI: 0.15; 0.77) were less likely to have an ACT< 16 compared to those not taking medications regularly. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our findings highlighted an unsatisfactory asthma control in the general population, independently of the severity level of the disease. Community pharmacies could be a useful frontline interface between patients and the health care services, supporting an effective asthma management plan, from disease assessment and monitoring treatment compliance to referral of patients to specialist medical consultancies.

Allergic rhinitis: pharmacotherapy in pregnancy and old age.

INTRODUCTION: Allergic rhinitis (AR) affects 20-30% of women in reproductive age and may worsen during pregnancy. About 10% of the elderly suffer from AR, and it could be under-diagnosed in these patients. Many drugs are currently available, however AR treatment during pregnancy and old age represents a challenging issue. AREAS COVERED: A review of the literature on the topic has been performed. Expert commentary: In pregnancy, drug avoidance should be carefully balanced with the need for AR optimal control. Topical drugs are suggested as a first approach. The safety and tolerability profile of second-generation antihistamines is well supported. If allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is ongoing and well tolerated, there is no reason for stopping it. AIT initiation in pregnancy is not recommended. For elderly patients, no specific concerns have been highlighted regarding topical treatments, except from nasal decongestionants. Second generation antihistamines are generally well tolerated. Old age should not preclude AIT.

Subcutaneous allergen specific immunotherapy: best clinical practice as cornerstone for future development.

Allergen subcutaneous immunotherapy is a long lasting treatment which can modify the natural history of allergic respiratory diseases. Recommended administration is required for a minimum of three years. During this long term therapy the daily management is based on two crucial points, discussed in this review, such as the prevention and the treatment of side effects and the improvement and follow-up of patient adherence. This review specifically focuses on subcutaneous immunotherapy.

Comparaison du mecanisme de l'action cardiotonique de la fraction 3 de mai- boa et de la digoxine sur le cour isole de rat

MAI-BAO est une boisson issue de la fermentation du the Camela sinensis sucre par le Champignon The-tresor. La fraction chromatographique no3 de MAI-BAO (MB-F3 ou F3) exerce un effet cardiotonique.But gomparaison du mecanisme d'activite cardiotonique de MB-F3 et de la Digoxine (Dx) chez le rat. Materiels et Methodes : MB-F3 obtenue par chromatographie sur gel sephadex G-50 et la digoxine sont utilisees pour perfuser le coeur isole de rat dont les contractions sont enregistrees avec le dispositif de Langendhorff. Le mecanisme biochimique de l'action cardiaque de MB-F3 et Dx est determine par dosage du phosphore selon la methode de Sumner. Resultats : MB-F3 exerce un effet cardiotonique inferieur a celui de Dx (P0;05) avec des Doses efficaces 50respectives de 1mg/ml et 10-6mg/ml. Par ailleurs; MB-F3 exerce une inhibition competitive inferieure a celle de Dx (P0;05) sur l'ATPase-Na+/K+.Conclusion : MB-F3 exerce une action digitalique-like inferieure a celle de Dx sur le coeur de rat

Long-term tolerability of etoricoxib in different types of NSAID-intolerant subjects.

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a frequent cause of hypersensitivity reactions, therefore, in clinical practice, it's important to find safe and effective substances. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the tolerability of etoricoxib and its subsequent actual use and safety at home. METHODS: Etoricoxib tolerance was assessed by single-blind-placebo-controlled oral challenges and its subsequent use was checked by a standardized telephone call. The test was performed in 139 subjects (83 single NSAID reactors and 56 multiple NSAID reactors). RESULTS: The drug was not tolerated in 4 cases (2.8%) causing wheals on the face area in 3 single reactors and a severe generalised reaction occurring three hours after the intake of a therapeutic dose in a multiple reactor. The phone calls showed that 64 (52.8%) patients did not take etoricoxib, mostly due to the fear of adverse effects; in 5 cases (4.2%), the practitioner prescribed a different NSAIDs. Only 52 (43%) subjects took etoricoxib after oral challenges; all tolerated the drug but 2 single reactors, who reported a very mild labial oedema. CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed the good long-term tolerability of etoricoxib in patients with a history of hypersensitivity to other NSAIDs without differences between single and multiple reactors. Nonetheless, in NSAID-intolerant subjects this drug should be first challenged in specialised centres due to the risk ofsevere reactions.

How much specific is the association between hymenoptera venom allergy and mastocytosis?

BACKGROUND: The preferential association of mastocytosis with hymenoptera sting reactions is well known, but there is no data on the prevalence of clonal mast cell disorders in subjects with severe systemic reactions due to foods or drugs. METHODS: Patients with food- or drug-induced severe systemic reactions, including anaphylaxis, and increased serum tryptase were studied for the presence of mastocytosis, and compared with a population of patients with hymenoptera allergy. The aetiological role of foods or drugs was assessed according to current recommendations. Systemic reactions were graded in severity according to the procedure described by Mueller. Serum tryptase was considered increased if the level was >11.4 ng/ml. Subjects with increased tryptase had dermatological evaluation and Bone marrow(BM) aspirate-biopsy, which included histology/cytology, flow cytometry and detection of KIT mutations. RESULTS: A total of 137 subjects (57 male, mean age 42 years) were studied. Of them, 86 proved positive for drugs and 51 for foods. Overall, out of 137 patients, only nine (6.6%) had a basal tryptase >11.4 ng/ml, and only two (1.5%) were diagnosed with mastocytosis. This was clearly different from patients with hymenoptera allergy, where 13.9% had elevated tryptase and 11.1% had a clonal mast cell disorder. CONCLUSION: The association of clonal mast cell disorders with hymenoptera allergy seems to be more specific than that with food- or drug-induced systemic reactions.

Evaluation of the IgE cross-reactions among vespid venoms. A possible approach for the choice of immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Hymenoptera venom allergy can be effectively cured with specific immunotherapy, thus the correct identification of the allergen is essential. In the case of multiple skin and serum positivities it is important to know if a cross-reaction among venoms is present. We studied by CAP-inhibition assays the degree of cross-reactivity between Vespula vulgaris and Polistes dominulus. METHODS: Serum samples were obtained from consecutive patients with a clinical history of grade III-IV reactions to hymenoptera sting and with nondiscriminative skin/CAP positivity to both Vespula and Polistes. Inhibition assays were carried out with a CAP method, incubating the sera separately with both venoms and subsequently measuring the specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) to venoms themselves. RESULTS: Forty-five patients (33 male, mean age 40 years, age range 12-74, total serum IgE 242 +/- 168 kU/l) were included. Their specific IgE to Vespula and Polistes were 12.03 +/- 5.70 kU/l and 10.7 +/- 2.0 kU/l (P = NS), respectively. At the CAP-inhibition assays, in 25 patients a >75% heterologous inhibition by P. dominulus venom against V. vulgaris-specific IgE was found. In six subjects V. vulgaris venom effectively inhibited the P. dominulus-specific IgE. In the remaining 14 cases the CAP-inhibition test provided intermediate and not discriminative results. CONCLUSION: In 31/45 patients, the double sensitizations to venoms were probably the result of cross-reactions and the CAP-inhibition allowed identifying the true double sensitizations. This approach may be helpful for the correct prescription of immunotherapy in the case of V. vulgaris and P. dominulus double positivity.

Tolerability of three selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, meloxicam, celecoxib and rofecoxib in NSAID-sensitive patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients with aspirin-sensitive respiratory and cutaneous diseases experience cross reactions to all nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) which inhibit cyclo-oxigenase (COX) enzymes. As are now available drugs which selectively inhibit COX-2, questions are raised whether cross-reactivity occurs between aspirin and these COX 2 inhibitors. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the tolerability of three COX-2 inhibitors (meloxicam, celecoxib and rofecoxib) in subjects with previous pseudoallergic respiratory and cutaneous reactions to NSAIDs. METHODS: 76 subjects with documented previous cutaneous and respiratory pseudoallergic reactions to aspirin and/or other NSAIDs underwent a single blind challenge with celecoxib, meloxicam and rofecoxib. RESULTS: All subjects with previous respiratory reactions tolerated all drugs. Three subjects with multiple-drug induced urticaria complained of a generalized reaction after challenge (Two due to celecoxib and one due to meloxicam). Among the group of patients with NSAIDs-induced urticaria five complained of a relapse of the disease due to rofecoxib (one subject), celecoxib (two subjects and meloxicam (two subjects). CONCLUSIONS: According to these results the cross-reactivity between aspirin and these COX-2 inhibitors does not occur in subjects with previous respiratory pseudoallergic reactions. A good safety profile was also demonstrated in patients with cutaneous reactions, being few reactions observed. However for this reason a controlled oral challenge with these drugs is useful for the proper management of patients sensitive to classic NSAIDs.

Evaluation of the nocebo effect during oral challenge in patients with adverse drug reactions.

The nocebo effect is the onset of untoward reactions following the administration of an indifferent substance. The oral challenge with alternative drugs plays a central role in the management of drug allergy and the use of inert substances is part of this procedure. We evaluated the occurrence and clinical characteristics of nocebo effect in patients with adverse drug reactions. Six hundred patients, seen in three different centres (Genoa, Naples and Verona) with a history of reactions to drugs, underwent a blind oral challenge with the administration of an indifferent substance and active drugs. The administration of an inert substance provoked untoward reactions in 54 patients (27%) in Verona, 60 (30%) in Naples and 48 (24%) in Genoa. The overall occurrence of nocebo effect was 27%. The majority of reactions were subjective symptoms (itching, malaise, headache etc), perceived as troublesome by all subjects. The occurrence was significantly higher in women than in men. Our data, collected in a large population, confirm that the nocebo effect occurs frequently in clinical practice. In managing adverse drug reactions through oral challenge the nocebo effect is mandatory to recognize false positive responses.

[Occupational asthma induced by casein inhalation]. / Asma professionale da inalazione di caseina.

Reported cases of occupational asthma due to inhalation of milk proteins are rare. Our report is about the first evidence of occupational asthma in a health care worker, caused by an hidden exposure to casein, contained in a commercial dermatological powder widely used in geriatric patients treatment. The diagnosis is based on the case-history and on the positive skin prick test to a commercial and extemporary extract of the occupational allergen.

Anaphylaxis due to carrot as hidden food allergen.

Carrot is frequently involved in food allergies and oral allergy syndromes, usually in association with other foods. Nevertheless, carrot alone is rarely responsible for severe systemic reactions. We report a case of anaphylactic shock due to the inadvertent ingestion of carrot as a hidden allergen contained in an ice-cream. The etiological role of carrot in provoking the symptoms was thoroughly ascertained through appropriate in vivo and in vitro assays and by excluding, through double-blind placebo-controlled challenge, the involvement of other ingredients of the food. We highlight once again the harm and risks due to hidden food allergens contained in commercial preparations and the importance of thorough patient education and information.

Anaphylaxis due to carrot as hidden food allergen

Carrot is frequently involved in food allergies and oral allergy syndromes, usually in association with other foods. Nevertheless, carrot alone is rarely responsible for severe systemic reactions. We report a case of anaphylactic shock due to the inadvertent ingestion of carrot as a hidden allergen contained in an ice-cream. The etiological role of carrot in provoking the symptoms was thoroughly ascertained through appropriate in vivo and in vitro assays and by excluding, through double-blind placebo-controlled challenge, the involvement of other ingredients of the food. We highlight once again the harm and risks due to hidden food allergens contained in commercial preparations and the importance of thorough patient education and information (AU)

La zanahoria suele estar implicada en reacciones alérgicas alimentarias y síndromes alérgicos orales, habitualmente en asociación con otros alimentos. No obstante, rara vez la zanahoria sola es responsable de reacciones generales graves. Describimos un caso de shock anafiláctico por la ingestión accidental de zanahoria como alergeno oculto en un helado. El papel etiológico de la zanahoria en la inducción de los síntomas se averiguó minuciosamente mediante análisis apropiados in vivo e in vitro y excluyendo, por medio de una prueba de provocación doble ciega y controlada con placebo, la implicación de otros ingredientes del producto. Subrayamos una vez más el peligro y los riesgos de los alergenos alimentarios ocultos contenidos en preparados comerciales y la importancia de educar e informar exhaustivamente a los pacientes (AU)

Local nasal immunotherapy: efficacy and tolerability of two different administration schedules in grass pollen rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Efficacy and safety of local nasal immunotherapy has been demonstrated by many placebo-controlled clinical trials. The treatment schedule consists of an induction phase at increasing dosages followed by a maintenance phase. Aim of present study has been to evaluate a new simplified treatment schedule at constant dosage. METHODS AND RESULTS: 26 grass-allergic rhinitic patients have been treated according to the new constant dosage schedule, while 15 patients in a control group were treated with conventional incremental dosage schedule. A commercial preparation of allergens incorporated into powder (Allerkin). The total cumulative dosage administered with conventional schedule resulted higher than simplified constant schedule (5,025 vs 3,000 AU). To evaluate efficacy, symptom and rescue medication scores were recorded during the spring pollen season, and a subjective overall evaluation was asked to the patients at the end of the season. The analysis of scores showed that the two treatment schedules were equivalent as regards both efficacy and safety, being side effects light and restricted to the administration site (sneezing). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a constant dosage schedules is suggested for the administration of local nasal immunotherapy, having as advantage a better simplicity. Avoidance of mistakes in dosages is considered important in a therapy which is self-administered by patients.

Anaphylaxis to pine nuts and immunological cross-reactivity with pine pollen proteins.

Despite the wide use of pine nuts, the fruit of Pinus pinea, only a few reports of allergic reactions to them have been published. We present herein a case of food allergy to pine nuts in a patient who showed no clinical symptoms to pine pollen despite the presence in her serum of specific IgE antibodies. In order to verify whether the reaction against pine nuts was IgE mediated, specific IgE against pine nuts and pollen were evaluated by skin-prick test, prick by prick and RAST. Immunoblotting and immunoblotting-inhibition were used to evaluate the allergenic components of both extracts and their cross-reactivity. Prick by prick with fresh pine nuts and RAST with pine nut and pine pollen extracts showed that the patient had high levels of specific IgE against both extracts. Immunoblotting experiments showed the presence in serum of IgE antibodies against several components in pine nuts and pollen. Immunoblotting-inhibition experiments demonstrated the presence of some cross-reacting components. These data confirm the existence of food allergy induced by pine nuts. This sensitization to pine nuts developed with no symptoms of pine pollinosis. Development of pollinosis may require a longer time of exposure to allergens. Based on the cross-reactivity between pine nut and pine pollen extracts, cosensitization to these two allergens could be possible.