Comparison of acidic polymers for the removal of cobalt from water solutions by polymer assisted ultrafiltration.

In this study, three sulfonated water-soluble polymers based on poly(vinyl alcohol) of different molecular weights (10,000, 50,000 and 100,000 Da) were prepared and tested against commercially available poly(acrylic acid) for the removal of cobalt using polymer assisted ultrafiltration. High rejection rates were obtained between pH 3 and 6 with sulfonated poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA 10,000 and 50,000 Da) whereas poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) of similar molecular weights performed rather poorly in this pH range. Sulfonation improved significantly sorption capability of PVA. Sulfonated PVA 10,000 was the best complexing agent with rejection rate above 95% between pH 3 and 6. For unmodified PVA the rejection rate was only 30-45% at pH 6 and there was no rejection at pH 3 at all. PAA rejection rate was above 90% at pH 6 and only about 10% at pH 3. Large scale experiment in cross-flow, continuous apparatus conducted by using PVA-SO(3)H 10,000 Da to remove (60)Co radioisotope from water solutions showed excellent results demonstrating the potential of this polymer to purify acidic radioactive wastes containing cobalt radioisotopes.

Chromatographic comparison of bupivacaine imprinted polymers prepared in crushed monolith, microsphere, silica-based composite and capillary monolith formats.

A comprehensive comparison of five chromatographic stationary phases based on molecularly imprinted polymers is presented. Efficiency, imprinting factors, water compatibility and batch-to-batch reproducibility are discussed for crushed monolith, microspheres, two silica-based composites and capillary monoliths, all imprinted with the local anaesthetic bupivacaine. Synthesis protocol and chromatographic test conditions have been kept fixed within certain limits, in order to provide further insight into the strengths and weaknesses of the different formats. Excluding microparticles, all formats give satisfactory performance, especially in aqueous mobile phases. An assessment of batch-to-batch reproducibility in different mobile phases adds further value to this comparison study.

Immobilized N-methyl-D-glucamine as an arsenate-selective resin.

Immobilization of N-methyl-D-glucamine (NMDG) on poly(vinylbenzyl chloride) beads yields an effective and highly selective sorbent for arsenate ions. Three important parameters in the resin's high As(V) affinity and selectivity are the structure of the ligand, its ionic form, and the crosslink density of the polymer. The NMDG resin crosslinked with 2 wt % divinylbenzene is far more selective than commercially available analogues, especially when sulfate and chloride ions are present in solution at high concentrations. Selectivity studies at neutral pH indicate that the protonated tertiary amine moiety is an important component of the complexation mechanism. The NMDG resin also has a high affinity for the un-ionized As(V) species at pH 1.

Treatment of arsenic-containing solutions using chitosan derivatives: uptake mechanism and sorption performances.

Modified chitosan gel beads, which had been prepared by the molybdate adsorption and coagulation (in the presence of molybdate) methods, were tested for As(III) and As(V) removal from dilute solutions (in the range 5-20 mg As L-1). The sorbent is very efficient at removing As(V) from acid solutions (optimum pH close to pH 2-3), whereas the sorption capacities are significantly lower for As(III) uptake (230 mg As(V) g-1 Mo, 70 mg As(III) g-1 Mo, respectively). Since the sorption proceeds in acidic solutions with a partial release of molybdate and with residual concentrations (ca. 500 micrograms As L-1) above the regulations for drinking water, the process appears to be directed to the treatment of industrial effluents or as a pre-concentration process. The mechanism of As(V) sorption is related to the ability of molybdate ions to complex As(V) ions in acid solutions. The uptake mechanism was confirmed by XPS analysis and desorption studies. In the case of As(III) sorption the mechanism of uptake is not identified since no complex has been cited in the literature regarding As(III) binding to Mo (VI), which was also identified by XPS analysis as the sorption site. As(V) sorption is not influenced by the presence of co-ions, with the exception of phosphate anions at low concentration, and silicate at high relative concentration. Arsenic desorption can be performed using phosphoric acid solutions.