Critical reading of scientific arcticles on diagnostic studies.

The issue of this review is diagnostic accuracy studies by means of which it can be determined how precisely a test can identify patients with or without a given target condition. Diagnostic accuracy studies vary substantially in design but usually report outcome measures such as sensitivity and specificity. Diagnostic accuracy studies can be critically appraised by using QUADAS-2. Some study characteristics to consider is the avoidance of a case-control study design, patient selection, and the reference standard. Also, the statistical imprecision and the applicability of a study to a general population are essential factors to consider.

Autonomic dysfunction after mild acute ischemic stroke and six months after: a prospective observational cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Autonomic dysfunction is prevalent in ischemic stroke patients and associated with a worse clinical outcome. We aimed to evaluate autonomic dysfunction over time and the tolerability of the head-up tilt table test in an acute stroke setting to optimize patient care. PATIENTS AND METHOD: In a prospective observational cohort study, patients were consecutively recruited from an acute stroke unit. The patients underwent heart rate and blood pressure analysis during the Valsalva maneuver, deep breathing, active standing, and head-up tilt table test if active standing was tolerated. In addition, heart rate variability and catecholamines were measured. All tests were performed within seven days after index ischemic stroke and repeated at six months follow-up. RESULTS: The cohort was comprised of 91 acute stroke patients, mean (SD) age 66 (11) years, median (IQR) initial National Institute of Health Stroke Scale 2 (1-4) and modified Ranking Scale 2 (1-3). The head-up tilt table test revealed 7 patients (10%) with orthostatic hypotension. The examination was terminated before it was completed in 15%, but none developed neurological symptoms. In the acute state the prevalence of autonomic dysfunction varied between 10-100% depending on the test. No changes were found in presence and severity of autonomic dysfunction over time. CONCLUSION: In this cohort study of patients with mild stroke, autonomic dysfunction was highly prevalent and persisted six months after index stroke. Head-up tilt table test may be used in patients who tolerate active standing. Autonomic dysfunction should be recognized and handled in the early phase after stroke.

Endocervical sampling in women with suspected cervical neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

OBJECTIVE: Endocervical sampling in women with suspected cervical neoplasia can be performed by either endocervical brush or endocervical curettage. This study aimed to estimate the diagnostic accuracy, discomfort, and number of inadequate samples with either test. DATA SOURCES: Four bibliographic databases were searched on June 9, 2022, with no date or language restrictions. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included all diagnostic studies and randomized clinical trials that compared the endocervical brush with endocervical curettage in women with an indication for colposcopy. METHODS: The review protocol was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42021222406). Two authors independently screened studies, extracted data, performed the risk-of-bias assessment (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2), and rated the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. A meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy was performed using a bivariate random-effects model. RESULTS: We included 7 studies: 4 diagnostic cohort studies and 3 randomized clinical trials. The reference standard was conization or hysterectomy. Risk of bias and concern about applicability were high for some of the studies in patient selection and flow and timing. Overall pooled sensitivity was 81% (95% confidence interval, 48-95; 799 women; 7 studies; low quality of evidence) for endocervical brush and 70% (95% confidence interval, 42-89; 761 women; 7 studies; low quality of evidence) for endocervical curettage. Overall pooled specificity was 73% (95% confidence interval, 36-93; 799 women; 7 studies; low quality of evidence) for endocervical brush and 81% (95% confidence interval, 56-94; 761 women; 7 studies; low quality of evidence) for endocervical curettage. The risk ratio for inadequate samples with endocervical curettage compared with endocervical brush was 2.53 (95% confidence interval, 0.58-11.0; P=.215; low-certainty evidence). Two studies reported on patient discomfort; one found less discomfort in the endocervical brush group, and the other found no difference. CONCLUSION: No difference was found between endocervical brush and endocervical curettage in diagnostic accuracy, inadequate sampling rate, and adverse effects based on low-quality of evidence. Variation in the characteristics of women and the resulting diagnostic pathways make the external validity limited.

Beta-Blockers in High-Risk Outpatients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease are Associated with All-Cause Mortality - The STATUETTE Cohort Study.

Background: Beta-blockers have been proposed to improve COPD-related outcomes, yet studies report conflicting results. We aimed to investigate the effect of beta blockers on time-to-first exacerbation and all-cause mortality in high-risk COPD outpatients. Methods: All COPD outpatients managed at the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Hvidovre, Denmark in 2016 were followed for 3.5 years in this retrospective, registry-based cohort study. Outcomes were time-to-first acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) or death. The association was estimated using time-varying crude and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression adjusted for age, sex, BMI, use of COPD medication, smoking status, cardiovascular disease and COPD severity. Results: The cohort comprised 950 COPD outpatients, mean age 71 (SD 11) years, and FEV1 44% predicted (IQR 33%; 57%). The annual exacerbation rate was 0.88 (SD 1.68) and 211 patients (22%) had a history of hospitalization requiring AECOPD within 12 months. Of the enrolled patients, 247 (26%) were prescribed beta blockers. Beta-blocker use was associated, although with borderline significance, with increased all-cause mortality (HR 1.37 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.89, p = 0.059)). On the other hand, beta blocker use did not reduce the risk of AECOPD (HR = 0.89 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.10; p = 0.270)), which remained non-significant after stratifying for severity of exacerbations. Conclusion: We found an association between beta blocker use and all-cause mortality in high-risk COPD outpatients. No association was found between beta blocker use and risk of AECOPD.

Statins in High-Risk Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Outpatients: No Impact on Time to First Exacerbation and All-Cause Mortality - The STATUETTE Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Statins have, due to their anti-inflammatory properties, been suggested to potentially improve chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) outcomes. We aimed to investigate the effect of statins on time to first exacerbation and all-cause mortality in high-risk COPD outpatients. METHODS: All outpatients with COPD seen at the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Denmark in 2016 were identified and followed for 3.5 years in this retrospective, registry-based cohort study of time to first acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) or death. AECOPD was defined as a rescue course of oral corticosteroid and/or hospital admission. The association was estimated using time-varying crude and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 950 COPD outpatients, mean (SD) age 71 (11) years, and FEV1 44% predicted (IQR 33%; 57%). The annual exacerbation rate was 0.88 (1.68) and 211 patients (22%) had a history of hospital admission for AECOPD in the 12 months prior to index date. Three hundred and ninety-three patients (41.4%) were defined as statin users, with 131 (33.3%) having filled the first prescription for statin after index date. Statin use was not associated with reduced risk of AECOPD. When stratifying for moderate and severe exacerbations in a sub-analysis in the same model, statin use did not have an increased HR for exacerbation of either severity (HR = 1.02 (95% CI 0.85to 1.24; p = 0.811) and HR = 1.07 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.29; p = 0.492) respectively). Statin use was not associated with all-cause mortality (HR 1.05 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.47, p = 0.777)). CONCLUSION: We did not find any association between statin use and risk of AECOPD or all-cause mortality. The result adds to the evidence that an aggressive approach with statin treatment upfront is not beneficial in COPD, unless prescribed according to current guidelines for cardiovascular diseases.

[Statins and COPD: relationship with inflammation, exacerbations and mortality].

The role of statins on the disease course of COPD is controversial. Observational studies have shown a reduction in mortality and exacerbations, but results of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of statin treatment and its effect on adverse outcomes are conflicting. Recent meta-analyses suggest the need for further RCTs including COPD patients both with and without concurrent cardiovascular disease (CVD). As there are no known detrimental effects of statins in COPD patients, we conclude in this review, that statins should be prescribed more frequently in these patients due to the common co-morbidity with CVD.