Acurate neo2 is associated with a reduced inflammatory response in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the inflammatory response between low radial force valves (Acurate neo2, Boston Scientific) and high radial force valves (Evolut R/Pro, Medtronic; SAPIEN Edwards Lifesciences; and Myval, Meril valves). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with TAVI between 2021 and 2022. The primary endpoint was the difference in the inflammatory response between low radial force valves and high radial force valves, measured as the difference between post-procedural and pre-procedural high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels (hsCRP delta). RESULTS: A total of 114 patients were included, of which 65 patients (57%) received a low radial force valve. The hsCRP delta was lower in the low radial force valve group compared to the high radial force valve group (8.7 [2.1-15.6] mg/L vs. 18.8 mg/dL [6.4-19] mg/L; P=0.003), due to a lower post-implantation hsCRP (8.9 [5.45-19.6] mg/L vs. 15.8 [9.8-27.3] mg/L; P=0.013). The incidence of new left bundle branch block (LBBB) after TAVI was lower in the low radial force valve group compared to the high radial force valve group (11 [17%] vs. 18 [37%]; P=0.020). CONCLUSIONS: Low radial force TAVI prostheses were associated with a lower inflammatory response, and a lower incidence of new LBBB compared to the radial force valve group, suggesting that inflammation may contribute to the increased risk of conduction disturbances.

Response to interleukin-1 blockade with anakinra in women and men with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin-1 blockade with anakinra reduces high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels and prevents heart failure (HF) events after ST-segment myocardial infarction (STEMI). Sex-based differences in STEMI patients have been reported, but no data are available regarding response to anakinra. METHODS: We analyzed the systemic inflammation and composite end-point of new-onset HF or death in women and men with STEMI treated with anakinra from three different Virginia Commonwealth University Anakinra Response Trial (VCUART) randomized clinical trials. RESULTS: We analyzed 139 patients, 29 (21%) were women while 110 (79%) were men. Baseline hsCRP was higher in women compared to men (8.9 [5.2-13.5] vs. 4.2 [2.1-7.7] mg/L, P<0.001). Eighty-four patients were treated with anakinra (22 [75%] women and 62 [56%] men). The area under the curve of hsCRP (hsCRP-AUC) after 14 days was numerically lower in patients receiving anakinra versus placebo both in men (86 [37-130] vs. 223 [119-374] mg day/L) and in women (73 [46-313] vs. 242 [102-988] mg day/L) (P<0.001 for multiple groups, P for interaction 0.22). The incidence of the composite endpoint was also numerically lower in the anakinra group compared to placebo, both in men (4 [6.4%] vs. 14 [29.1%]) and in women (3 [13.6%] vs. 2 [28.5%]) (P=0.019 for multiple groups, P for interaction 0.44). There were no statistically significant differences between women and men in hsCRP-AUC and death or HF events when comparing separately the anakinra and placebo groups (all P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Women were underrepresented in the VCUART trials, they appeared to have higher hsCRP levels at time of presentation, yet to benefit similar to men by treatment with anakinra in STEMI.

Contribution of hemoglobin concentration to cardiorespiratory fitness in black African American patients with recently decompensated heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and anemia have reduced peak oxygen consumption (VO2). Black or African American (B-AA) patients have a higher prevalence of anemia and are underrepresented in clinical studies of HFrEF. The aim of this study was to determine the contribution of hemoglobin to peak VO2 in B-AA patients recently hospitalized for acute decompensated HFrEF. METHODS: We analyzed cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) data measured within two weeks of discharge for acute decompensated HF in B-AA patients with HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤40%) without severe anemia (Hb<8 g/dL). Blood samples were collected prior to CPX. Data are reported as median [interquartile range] and compared between groups with the Mann-Whitney, Chi-Square, and Spearman's rank tests. RESULTS: We included 81 patients; 27 (33%) women, 57 [27-79] years of age, Body Mass Index of 33 [15-55] kg/m2 and LVEF of 30 [23-36] %. Hemoglobin ranged between 9.1 to 18.1 g/dL (median= 13.3 [11.9-14.5] g/dL); 26 (32%) were considered to have anemia based on a Hb concentration of males <13 g/dL and females <12 g/dL. Peak VO2 was lower in patients with anemia (11.8 [10.0-14.2] vs. 14.1 [10.6-17.0] mL·kg-1·min-1; P=0.010) with a significant correlation between peak VO2 and hemoglobin concentration (R=+0.455; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Anemia is prevalent among B-AA patients with recently decompensated HFrEF and appears to be a significant contributor to reductions in peak VO2.

Dual Role of Guide Extension Catheters for the Management of High Thrombus Burden in STEMI: Case Report and Mini Review.

High thrombus burden in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients increases the risk of adverse events. In this report, we review current strategies for high thrombus burden and present a case report with the combination of two different techniques: aspiration through a guide extension catheter followed by local intracoronary thrombolysis with 'marinade' technique.

Rheumatoid Arthritis, Statin Indication and Lipid Goals: Analysis According to Different Recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Different strategies have been proposed for the cardiovascular risk management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). OBJECTIVES: (1) To estimate the cardiovascular risk by different strategies in RA patients, analyzing which proportion of patients would be candidates to receive statin therapy; (2) to identify how many patients meet the recommended lipid goals. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed from a secondary database. The QRISK-3 score, the Framingham score (adjusted for a multiplying factor×1.5), the ASCVD calculator and the SCORE calculator were estimated. The indications for statin therapy according to NICE, Argentine Consensus, ACC/AHA, and new European guidelines were analyzed. The recommended LDL-C goals were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 420 patients were included. In total, 24.7% and 48.7% of patients in primary and secondary prevention were receiving statins, respectively. Only 19.4% of patients with cardiovascular history received high intensity statins. Applying the ACC/AHA guidelines (based on ASCVD score), the Argentine Consensuses (based on adjusted Framingham score), the NICE guidelines (based on QRISK-3) and European recommendations (based on SCORE), 26.9%, 26.5%, 41.1% and 18.2% of the population were eligible for statin therapy, respectively. Following the new European recommendations, 50.0%, 46.2% and 15.9% of the patients with low-moderate, high or very high risk achieved the suggested lipid goals. CONCLUSION: Applying four strategies for lipid management in our population, the cardiovascular risk stratification and the indication for statins were different. A significant gap was observed when comparing the expected and observed statin indication, with few patients achieving the LDL-C goals.

Rheumatoid Arthritis, Statin Indication and Lipid Goals: Analysis According to Different Recommendations / Artritis reumatoide, indicación de estatinas y objetivos lipídicos: Análisis según diferentes recomendaciones

Background: Different strategies have been proposed for the cardiovascular risk management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Objectives(1) To estimate the cardiovascular risk by different strategies in RA patients, analyzing which proportion of patients would be candidates to receive statin therapy; (2) to identify how many patients meet the recommended lipid goals. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed from a secondary database. The QRISK-3 score, the Framingham score (adjusted for a multiplying factor×1.5), the ASCVD calculator and the SCORE calculator were estimated. The indications for statin therapy according to NICE, Argentine Consensus, ACC/AHA, and new European guidelines were analyzed. The recommended LDL-C goals were analyzed. Results: A total of 420 patients were included. In total, 24.7% and 48.7% of patients in primary and secondary prevention were receiving statins, respectively. Only 19.4% of patients with cardiovascular history received high intensity statins. Applying the ACC/AHA guidelines (based on ASCVD score), the Argentine Consensuses (based on adjusted Framingham score), the NICE guidelines (based on QRISK-3) and European recommendations (based on SCORE), 26.9%, 26.5%, 41.1% and 18.2% of the population were eligible for statin therapy, respectively. Following the new European recommendations, 50.0%, 46.2% and 15.9% of the patients with low-moderate, high or very high risk achieved the suggested lipid goals. Conclusion: Applying four strategies for lipid management in our population, the cardiovascular risk stratification and the indication for statins were different. A significant gap was observed when comparing the expected and observed statin indication, with few patients achieving the LDL-C goals.(AU)

Antecedentes: Se han propuesto diferentes estrategias para el manejo del riesgo cardiovascular en pacientes con artritis reumatoide (AR).Objetivos(1) estimar el riesgo cardiovascular mediante diferentes estrategias en pacientes con AR, analizando qué proporción de pacientes deberían recibir estatinas; (2) identificar cuántos pacientes alcanzaron los objetivos lipídicos recomendados. Métodos: Estudio de corte transversal. Se estimaron los puntajes QRISK-3, Framingham (ajustado por un factor multiplicador × 1,5), ASCVD y SCORE. Se analizaron las indicaciones de estatinas, según las guías NICE, el Consenso Argentino, las guías ACC/AHA 2018 y las nuevas directrices europeas. Se analizaron los objetivos de C-LDL. Resultados: Se incluyeron 420 pacientes; 24,7 y 48,7% de los pacientes en prevención primaria y secundaria recibían estatinas, respectivamente. El 19,4% de los pacientes con antecedentes cardiovasculares recibían estatinas de alta intensidad. Aplicando las guías ACC/AHA (basadas en el puntaje ASCVD), el Consenso Argentino (basado en el puntaje ajustado de Framingham), las pautas NICE (basadas en el QRISK-3) y las recomendaciones europeas (basadas en el SCORE), 26,9, 26,5, 41,1 y el 18,2% de la población eran elegibles para el tratamiento con estatinas, respectivamente. Siguiendo las nuevas recomendaciones europeas, 50, 46,2 y 15,9% de los pacientes con riesgo bajo-moderado, alto o muy alto lograron los objetivos lipídicos recomendados. Conclusión: Aplicando varias estrategias para el manejo de los lípidos en nuestra población, la estratificación del riesgo cardiovascular y la indicación de estatinas fueron diferentes. Se observó una brecha significativa entre la indicación de estatinas esperada y observada, logrando los objetivos de C-LDL muy pocos pacientes.(AU)

Heart failure clinical trial enrollment at a rural satellite hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Heart failure is a clinical condition that notably affects the lives of patients in rural areas. Partnering of a rural satellite hospital with an urban academic medical center may provide geographically underrepresented populations with heart failure an opportunity to access to controlled clinical trials (CCTs). METHODS: We report our experience in screening, consenting and enrolling subjects at the VCU Health Community Memorial Hospital (VCU-CMH) in rural South Hill, Virginia, that is part of the larger VCU Health network, with the lead institution being VCU Health Medical College of Virginia Hospitals (VCU-MCV), Richmond, VA. Subjects were enrolled in a clinical trial sponsored by the National Institutes of Health and assigned to treatment with an anti-inflammatory drug for heart failure or placebo. We used the electronic health record and remote guidance and oversight from the VCU-MCV resources using a close-loop communication network to work with local resources at the facility to perform screening, consenting and enrollment. RESULTS: One hundred subjects with recently decompensated heart failure were screened between January 2019 and August 2021, of these 61 are enrolled to date: 52 (85%) at VCU-MCV and 9 (15%) at VCU-CMH. Of the subjects enrolled at VCU-CMH, 33% were female, 77% Black, with a mean age of 52 ± 10 years. CONCLUSION: The use of a combination of virtual/remote monitoring and guidance of local resources in this trial provides an opportunity for decentralization and access of CCTs for potential novel treatment of heart failure to underrepresented individuals from rural areas. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03797001.

Prognosis of patients with acute pulmonary embolism and discordant right ventricle strain serum biomarkers.

BACKGROUND: Right ventricle strain serum biomarkers, such as high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and NT-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), are prognostic in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE). Prognosis accuracy in patients with discordancy between serum biomarkers remains, however, unknown. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis in patients with intermediate or high risk PE and discordant serum biomarkers of RV strain as follows: high hs-cTnT and low NT-proBNP ('high troponin discordance'), compared to patients with low hs-cTnT and high NT-proBNP ('high NT-proBNP discordance'). Cut-off values for high hs-cTnT were ≥14 pg/mL in patients <75 years and ≥45 pg/mL in patients >75-year. Cut-off values for high NT-proBNP were ≥600 pg/mL. The primary end-point was a composite of death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, mechanical ventilation, and inotrope use at one month. 'High troponin discordance', age, sex and body mass index (BMI) were included in a logistic regression model. Time to event analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier curves and Log-rank test. RESULTS: 73 patients were included. 'High troponin discordance' patients (n=41) were younger, presented with a higher heart rate, more frequent bilateral PE, and received more thrombolytics as treatment compared with 'high NT-proBNP discordance' patients (n = 32). Primary end-point was significantly higher in the 'high troponin discordance' patients (29.3% vs 9.4%, p=0.045). 'High troponin discordance' was independently associated with the primary end-point after adjusting for age, sex and BMI. Log rank test confirmed worse outcome in the high troponin discordance group (p=0.037). CONCLUSIONS: High troponin discordance' patients with intermediate/high risk PE, had worse outcomes than patients with high BNP discordance.

[Single center retrospective study of catheter directed thrombolysis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism]. / Estudio unicéntrico del tratamiento con trombolíticos dirigidos por catéter en el tromboembolismo pulmonar agudo.

We performed a single center retrospective study in patients wi th pulmonary embolism (PE) undergoing catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) from 2014 to 2020. Efficacy was defined by mean pulmonary pressure drop, and safety was assessed by intracranial and severe bleeding (defined by GUSTO). Forty-three patients were included, aged 64 (56-79) years old, 5 (12%) with shock, most with right ventricle dilation (95%) and bilateral PE (95%) or unilateral (5%) in patients with only one functional lung. CDT was used as first treatment (53%), upscale after anticoagulation alone (42%), or after failed systemic thrombolytics (5%). Median recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) dose was 30 (25-35) mg over 20 (20-20) hours, and rtPA bolus was used after catheter placement in 38 cases (89%), consisting of 5 mg (95%) or 1 mg (5%). Only one lung was treated for technical reasons, and 4 (9%) were repositioned in the same lung for continuation of infusion. A significant reduction in mean pulmonary pressure was observed (pre 35 [29-41] mmHg vs. post 24 [20-34] mmHg, p < 0.001) with no intracranial bleeding. One patient (2%) experienced severe bleeding, while 5 (12%) presented access site bleeding, and 3 (7%) required blood transfusions. In-hospital mortality was 12% but only one case (2%) due to PE. Our results are similar to previously reported studies.

Se realizó un estudio unicéntrico retrospectivo para evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de trombolisis dirigida por catéter (TDC) en pacientes con tromboembolismo pulmonar agudo (TEP) de 2014 a 2020. Se analizó la efectividad (mejoría de presión pulmonar), y seguridad (sangrado intracraneal y grave definido por compromiso hemodinámico). Se incluyeron 43 pacientes, de 67(56-79) años, 5 (12%) con shock, 41 (95%) con dilatación del ventrículo derecho y TEP bilateral. La decis ión de TDC fue: tratamiento inicial (53%), escalada de anticoagulación (42%) y rescate de trombolisis sistémica (5%). Se utilizó TDC facilitada por ultrasonido en 40 casos (93%), utilizándose 30 (25-35) mg de activador tisular del plasminógeno recombinante (rtPA) durante 20 h. Se administró un bolo de rtPA en 38 (89%) casos, que fue 5 mg (95%) o 1 mg (5%). Se utilizó un solo catéter por paciente. En 4 (9%) se decidió recolocación (mismo pulmón) para continuar infusión en otro sector. Se observó una disminución significativa de la presión media pulmonar (pre 35 [29-41] mmHg vs. post 24 [20-34] mmHg, p < 0.001). No se observó ningún caso de hemorragia intracr aneal, y un caso (2%) de sangrado grave. Se observó hematoma del sitio de punción en 5 (12%) (incluyendo el sangrado grave), y requirió transfusiones en 3 (7%). La mortalidad intrahospitalaria fue 12%, siendo un solo c aso (2%) atribuido al TEP. El tratamiento con TDC fue efectivo asociándose a una reducción significativa de la presión pulmonar, sin observarse ningún sangrado intracraneal y con un sangrado grave. Nuestros resultados se asemejan a lo publicado en otros estudios.

Estudio unicéntrico del tratamiento con trombolíticos dirigidos por catéter en el tromboembolismo pulmonar agudo / Single center retrospective study of catheter directed thrombolysis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism

Resumen Se realizó un estudio unicéntrico retrospectivo para evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de trombolisis dirigida por catéter (TDC) en pacientes con tromboembolismo pulmonar agudo (TEP) de 2014 a 2020. Se analizó la efectividad (mejoría de presión pulmonar), y seguridad (sangrado intracraneal y grave definido por compromiso hemodinámico). Se incluyeron 43 pacientes, de 67(56-79) años, 5 (12%) con shock, 41 (95%) con dilatación del ventrículo derecho y TEP bilateral. La decis ión de TDC fue: tratamiento inicial (53%), escalada de anticoagulación (42%) y rescate de trombolisis sistémica (5%). Se utilizó TDC facilitada por ultrasonido en 40 casos (93%), utilizándose 30 (25-35) mg de activador tisular del plasminógeno recombinante (rtPA) durante 20 h. Se administró un bolo de rtPA en 38 (89%) casos, que fue 5 mg (95%) o 1 mg (5%). Se utilizó un solo catéter por paciente. En 4 (9%) se decidió recolocación (mismo pulmón) para continuar infusión en otro sector. Se observó una disminución significativa de la presión media pulmonar (pre 35 [29-41] mmHg vs. post 24 [20-34] mmHg, p<0.001). No se observó ningún caso de hemorragia intracraneal, y un caso (2%) de sangrado grave. Se observó hematoma del sitio de punción en 5 (12%) (incluyendo el sangrado grave), y requirió transfusiones en 3 (7%). La mortalidad intrahospitalaria fue 12%, siendo un solo c aso (2%) atribuido al TEP. El tratamiento con TDC fue efectivo asociándose a una reducción significativa de la presión pulmonar, sin observarse ningún sangrado intracraneal y con un sangrado grave. Nuestros resultados se asemejan a lo publicado en otros estudios.

Abstract We performed a single center retrospective study in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) undergoing catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) from 2014 to 2020. Efficacy was defined by mean pulmonary pressure drop, and safety was assessed by intracranial and severe bleeding (defined by GUSTO). Forty-three patients were included, aged 64 (56-79) years old, 5 (12%) with shock, most with right ventricle dilation (95%) and bilateral PE (95%) or unilateral (5%) in patients with only one functional lung. CDT was used as first treatment (53%), upscale after anticoagulation alone (42%), or after failed systemic thrombolytics (5%). Median recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) dose was 30 (25-35) mg over 20 (20-20) hours, and rtPA bolus was used after catheter placement in 38 cases (89%), consisting of 5 mg (95%) or 1 mg (5%). Only one lung was treated for technical reasons, and 4 (9%) were repositioned in the same lung for continuation of infusion. A significant reduction in mean pulmonary pressure was observed (pre 35 [29-41] mmHg vs. post 24 [20-34] mmHg, p<0.001) with no intracranial bleeding. One patient (2%) experienced severe bleeding, while 5 (12%) presented access site bleeding, and 3 (7%) required blood transfusions. In-hospital mortality was 12% but only one case (2%) due to PE. Our results are similar to previously reported studies.

Rheumatoid Arthritis, Statin Indication and Lipid Goals: Analysis According to Different Recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Different strategies have been proposed for the cardiovascular risk management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). OBJECTIVES: (1) To estimate the cardiovascular risk by different strategies in RA patients, analyzing which proportion of patients would be candidates to receive statin therapy; (2) to identify how many patients meet the recommended lipid goals. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed from a secondary database. The QRISK-3 score, the Framingham score (adjusted for a multiplying factor×1.5), the ASCVD calculator and the SCORE calculator were estimated. The indications for statin therapy according to NICE, Argentine Consensus, ACC/AHA, and new European guidelines were analyzed. The recommended LDL-C goals were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 420 patients were included. In total, 24.7% and 48.7% of patients in primary and secondary prevention were receiving statins, respectively. Only 19.4% of patients with cardiovascular history received high intensity statins. Applying the ACC/AHA guidelines (based on ASCVD score), the Argentine Consensuses (based on adjusted Framingham score), the NICE guidelines (based on QRISK-3) and European recommendations (based on SCORE), 26.9%, 26.5%, 41.1% and 18.2% of the population were eligible for statin therapy, respectively. Following the new European recommendations, 50.0%, 46.2% and 15.9% of the patients with low-moderate, high or very high risk achieved the suggested lipid goals. CONCLUSION: Applying four strategies for lipid management in our population, the cardiovascular risk stratification and the indication for statins were different. A significant gap was observed when comparing the expected and observed statin indication, with few patients achieving the LDL-C goals.