A multicenter, open-label, expanded phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of etirinotecan pegol, a polymer conjugate of irinotecan, in women with recurrent platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Etirinotecan pegol (EP) is a novel polyethylene glycol conjugated form of irinotecan with documented activity in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC). We report the results of the expanded portion of a phase II study of EP in patients with PROC who received prior pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) or who were unable to receive it. METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, phase II study evaluated EP q21d for PROC. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Patient populations evaluated included a modified intent-to-treat (mITT) group consisting of all patients who received at least one dose and with measurable disease and a primary efficacy (pEFF) group (subset of the mITT population who received prior PLD). RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine patients were enrolled. Of the 132 patients in the mITT group, 20 achieved an ORR (15.2%; 95% CI 9.5-22.4); median PFS and OS were 4.4 months and 10.2 months, respectively. In the pEFF group (n=104), 15 patients (14.4%; 95% CI 8.3-22.7) achieved an ORR; median PFS and OS were 4.4 months and 10.9 months, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were diarrhea (20%), abdominal pain (17%), vomiting (14%), dehydration (13%), and nausea (13%). Severe diarrhea was reduced to 15% with strict adherence to screening and management guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the activity and safety of single-agent EP in patients with PROC, including patients who received prior PLD. Further evaluation earlier in the disease course and in combination is warranted.

Evaluation of oral versus intravenous dose of vinorelbine to achieve equivalent blood exposures in patients with solid tumours.

Patient's preference is for oral chemotherapy when both oral and i.v. are available, provided that efficacy is equivalent. Reliable switch from oral to i.v. is possible if correspondence between respective doses has been established. Vinorelbine oral was developed as a line extension of VRL i.v. on the basis that similar AUCs result in similar activities. From a first crossover study on 24 patients receiving VRL 25 mg/m2 i.v. and 80 mg/m2 oral data extrapolation concluded on AUCs bioequivalence between Vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 i.v. and 80 mg/m2 oral. A new trial was performed to support this calculation. In a crossover design study on patients (PS 0-1) with advanced solid tumours (44% breast carcinoma), VRL was administered (30 mg/m2 i.v., 80 mg/m2 oral) with a standard meal and 5-HT3 antagonists, at 2 weeks interval. Pharmacokinetics was performed over 168 h and VRL was measured by LC-MS/MS. Statistics included bioequivalence tests. Forty-eight patients were evaluable for PK: median age 58 years (25-71), PS0/PS1: 20/28, M/F: 11/37. Mean AUCs were 1,230 +/- 290 and 1,216 +/- 521 ng/ml for i.v. and oral, respectively. The confidence interval of the AUC ratio (0.83-1.03) was within the required regulatory range (0.8-1.25) and proved the bioequivalence between the two doses. The absolute bioavailability was 37.8 +/- 16.0%, and close to the value from the first study (40%). Patient tolerability was globally comparable between both forms with no significant difference on either haematological or non-haematological toxicities (grade 3-4). This new study, conducted on a larger population, confirmed the reliable dose correspondence previously established between vinorelbine 80 mg/m2 oral and 30 mg/m2 i.v.

A phase III trial of docetaxel/carboplatin versus mitomycin C/ifosfamide/cisplatin (MIC) or mitomycin C/vinblastine/cisplatin (MVP) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised multicentre trial of the British Thoracic Oncology Group (BTOG1).

BACKGROUND: Phase III studies suggest that non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with cisplatin-docetaxel may have higher response rates and better survival compared with other platinum-based regimens. We report the final results of a randomised phase III study of docetaxel and carboplatin versus MIC or MVP in patients with advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with biopsy proven stage III-IV NSCLC not suitable for curative surgery or radiotherapy were randomised to receive four cycles of either DCb (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), carboplatin AUC 6), or MIC/MVP (mitomycin 6 mg/m(2), ifosfamide 3 g/m(2) and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) or mitomycin 6 mg/m(2), vinblastine 6 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2), respectively), 3 weekly. The primary end point was survival, secondary end points included response rates, toxicity and quality of life. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 17.4 months. Overall response rate was 32% for both arms (partial response = 31%, complete response = 1%); 32% of MIC/MVP and 26% of DCb patients had stable disease. One-year survival was 39% and 35% for DCb and MIC/MVP, respectively. Two-year survival was 13% with both arms. Grade 3/4 neutropenia (74% versus 43%, P < 0.005), infection (18% versus 9%, P = 0.01) and mucositis (5% versus 1%, P = 0.02) were more common with DCb than MIC/MVP. The MIC/MVP arm had significant worsening in overall EORTC score and global health status whereas the DCb arm showed no significant change. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of DCb had similar efficacy to MIC/MVP but quality of life was better maintained.

A national trainee advisory network: a proposal.

Trainees should have a well-defined and consistent communication conduit to the authorities involved with their training. It is important that trainees are involved in the evolution of structured training programmes and for training authorities to receive feedback from individuals in each specialty. This paper proposes a structure for trainee representation on regional and national training authorities to facilitate an advisory network.

Combretastatin A-4, an agent that displays potent and selective toxicity toward tumor vasculature.

Selective induction of vascular damage within tumors represents an emerging approach to cancer treatment. Histological studies have shown that several tubulin-binding agents can induce vascular damage within tumors but only at doses approximating the maximum tolerated dose, which has limited their clinical applicability. In this study, we show that the combretastatin A-4 prodrug induces vascular shutdown within tumors at doses less than one-tenth of the maximum tolerated dose. In vitro studies indicate that a short drug exposure results in profound long-term antiproliferative/cytotoxic effects against proliferating endothelial cells but not cells that are quiescent prior to and during drug exposure. Vascular shutdown, within experimental and human breast cancer models in vivo following systemic drug administration, was demonstrated with a reduction in functional vascular volume of 93% at 6 h following drug administration and persisted over the next 12 h, with corresponding histology consistent with hemorrhagic necrosis resulting from vascular damage. These actions against tumor vasculature and the broad therapeutic window demonstrate the clinical potential of these drugs and warrant further study to elucidate the mechanisms responsible for the antivascular effects of combretastatin A-4.

Surveillance policy for stage I ovarian germ cell tumors.

PURPOSE: Surveillance for stage I male germ cell tumors (GCT) is well established as a standard practice; however, such a policy has not been evaluated for women with equivalent tumors. This study was designed to evaluate the management of grade II or higher stage Ia tumors by close surveillance to minimize treatment, while reserving chemotherapy for patients with residual or recurrent disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1973 and 1995, 24 patients with malignant stage Ia ovarian GCT were enrolled onto a surveillance program. The group consisted of nine patients with dysgerminoma, nine with pure immature teratoma, and six with endodermal sinus tumor (with or without immature teratoma). Treatment consisted of surgical resection without adjuvant chemotherapy, followed by a surveillance program of clinical, serologic, and radiologic review, and included a second-look procedure for patients enrolled after 1982. RESULTS: All but one patient are alive and in remission after a median follow-up of 6.8 years. The 5-year overall survival is 95%, and the 5-year disease-free survival is 68%. Eight patients have required chemotherapy for recurrent disease or second primary ovarian GCT. This includes three patients with grade II immature teratoma and three patients with dysgerminoma, and a further two women with dysgerminoma who developed contralateral (presumed second primary) dysgerminoma 4.5 and 5.2 years after their first tumor. All but one, who died of a pulmonary embolus, have been successfully salvaged with chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Our experience emphasizes that patients with true stage Ia ovarian GCT are adequately managed by surgical resection followed by careful clinical, radiologic, and serologic surveillance. These patients do not require adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy, thus avoiding the potential complications of secondary leukemia and infertility.