Endovascular Treatment for Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis: Comparison among Different Endovascular Procedures.

Background: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is a rare, treatable cause of stroke. Even though CVST has an established medical treatment, 15% of patients remain refractory to treatment. These patients may be candidates for endovascular treatment (EVT), yet the selection of patients remains a challenge. The study aims to understand the profile and outcome of patients treated with EVT and the type of procedure associated with good outcomes. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective analysis of CVST patients who underwent EVT from 2009 till 2022. Patients who received only medical management were excluded. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤2 at 3 months was taken as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes assessed were hospital stay, death, recurrence, mRS ≤ 2 at discharge, and angiographic recanalization. Results: Fifty-two patients were included. Twenty-eight (53.8%) were males; the mean age was 33.3 ± 12.3 years. Headache (n = 44, 84.6%) predominated among the symptoms. The common risk factors were anemia (n = 13, 25.5%) and hyperhomocysteinemia (n = 13, 25.5%). Worsening of sensorium (n = 21, 40.3%) and non-improvement of symptoms (n = 15, 28.8%) were the common indications for the procedure. Twenty-five (48.1%) people underwent in situ thrombolysis (IST). Death occurred in eight (15.3%) patients. Thirty-six (73.5%; 36/49) patients had a good outcome at 3 months. IST had a significantly better outcome (mRS ≤ 2, n = 20, 80%) compared to other procedures (P = 0.04). Hospital stay was lesser in the IST subgroup, but without statistical significance. Midline shift >5 mm (odds ratio [OR] 6.8 [1.5-30.9], P = 0.01) and Glasgow Coma Scale <9 before the procedure (OR 27.2 [3.1-236.4], P = 0.002) predicted bad outcomes at 3 months. Female gender (OR 4.5 [1.07-8.8], P = 0.03), presence of altered sensorium (OR 10.2 [1.2-87.5], P = 0.01), encephalopathic syndrome (P = 0.02), presence of parenchymal bleed (OR 3.7 [0.9-4.5], P = 0.04), and midline shift (OR 4.8 [1.1-20.2], P = 0.03) were associated with poor outcome at discharge. Conclusion: EVT yielded good outcomes in carefully selected, medically refractory patients of CVST. IST performed well compared to other procedures.

Predictors of seizure outcome following resective surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy associated with focal gliosis.

OBJECTIVEThe authors studied the clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes of drug-resistant epilepsy associated with focal gliosis.METHODSFrom their epilepsy surgery database, the authors selected the patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and MRI-defined focal gliosis who underwent focal resective surgery. All patients underwent standard presurgical evaluation. Intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) was performed in patients with discordant presurgical data, ill-defined lesions, and lesions close to eloquent regions. Completeness of resection was defined on the basis of extraoperative and intraoperative electrocorticography studies. Favorable postoperative outcome was defined as Engel class I outcome during the last 2 years of follow-up.RESULTSSixty-six patients fulfilled inclusion criteria. An initial precipitating injury was present in 38 (57.6%) patients, mainly in the form of perinatal injury (n = 10), trauma (n = 10), and meningoencephalitis (n = 8). Gliosis involved a single lobe in 38 (57.6%) patients and 2 adjacent lobes in 14 (21.2%) patients; the remaining 14 (21.2%) patients had multilobar gliosis. In patients with unilobar or bilobar gliosis, the posterior region of the head was involved in 34 (65%) patients and the frontal lobes in 12 (23%) patients. During a median follow-up of 4 years (range 2-9 years), 41 (62.1%) patients had favorable outcome. On multivariate analysis, the presence of a well-defined aura (p = 0.019), electrocorticographically defined completeness of resection (p = 0.024), and normal postoperative EEG findings at 1 year (p = 0.003) were predictive of favorable postoperative seizure outcome.CONCLUSIONSFocal gliosis is a common etiology for drug-resistant extratemporal epilepsy in developing countries and is most often located in the posterior region of the head. The majority of these patients have perinatal injuries or neurological infections as initial precipitating injuries. Patients with focal gliosis have good postoperative seizure outcomes after well-planned resective surgery.

Optimal timing and differential significance of postoperative awake and sleep EEG to predict seizure outcome after temporal lobectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic value of postoperative EEGs to estimate post anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) seizure outcome. METHODS: We studied postoperative EEGs in 325 consecutive patients who had minimum five years of post-ATL followup. Interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) present only during sleep were classified as sleep IEDs. We defined favorable final-year outcome as no seizures during the final one year and favorable absolute-postoperative outcome as no seizures during the entire postoperative period. RESULTS: At mean follow-up of 7.3 ±â€¯1.8 years, 281 (86.5%) patients had favorable final-year outcome while 161 (49.5%) had favorable absolute-postoperative outcome. IEDs on three months and one year EEG were associated with unfavorable outcomes while IEDs at 7th day had no association with outcomes. Sleep record increased the yield of IEDs by 30% at each time-point without compromising predictive value. EEG at one year predicted the risk of seizure recurrence on drug withdrawal. CONCLUSION: While EEG at three months and at one-year after ATL predicted seizure outcome, EEG at 7th day was not helpful. Sleep record increases the sensitivity of postoperative EEG without compromising specificity. SIGNIFICANCE: Both awake and sleep EEG provide useful information in postoperative period following ATL.

Outcome after seizure recurrence on antiepileptic drug withdrawal following temporal lobectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To study the long-term outcome following seizure recurrence on antiepileptic drug (AED) withdrawal after anterior temporal lobectomy for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. METHODS: We retrospectively studied the AED profile of patients who had a minimum of 5 years of postoperative follow-up after anterior temporal lobectomy for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Only those patients with hippocampal sclerosis or normal MRI were included. AED withdrawal was initiated at 3 months in patients on ≥2 drugs and at 1 year for patients on a single drug. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-four patients with median postoperative follow-up of 12 years (range, 7-17 years) were included. Of them, 316 patients (82.3%) were seizure-free during the terminal 1 year. AED withdrawal was attempted in 326 patients (84.9%). At last follow-up, AEDs were discontinued in 207 patients (53.9%). Seizure recurrence occurred in 92 patients (28.2%) on attempted withdrawal. After a median postrecurrence follow-up of 7 years, 79 (86%) of them were seizure-free during the terminal 2 years. AEDs could be stopped in 17 patients (18.5%) and doses were reduced in another 57 patients (62%). Patients with febrile seizures, normal postoperative EEG at 1 year, and duration of epilepsy of <20 years (FND20 score) had 17% risk of seizure recurrence on attempted AED withdrawal. We also formulated a score to predict the chances of AED freedom for the whole cohort. CONCLUSION: Patients with seizure recurrence on AED withdrawal have good outcome with 86% becoming seizure-free and 18% becoming drug-free after initial recurrence. A FND20 score helps in predicting recurrence on AED withdrawal.