RESUMEN
Ménière's disease is a disabling condition causing vertigo and hearing loss yet remains incompletely understood. Registry studies have the potential to answer important questions about phenotypes and natural history of clinical conditions. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of a patient-centered national Ménière's disease registry. This was an observational study carried out at 4 state-funded hospitals and 4 independent clinics, within 3 distinct urban and rural regions within the UK. Adults with Ménière's disease were eligible to participate. A range of patient reported data, questionnaire data and clinical data (audiometric, radiological, and specialist balance testing data) was inputted into a bespoke database. The study recruited 411 participants. The majority of participants chose online recruitment (73%) and 27% chose via paper-based methods for participation. A small majority (57%) of participants were female. 96% of participants were of white ethnicity. Data completeness from online or postal data collection was similar. Around 20% of participants had audiological evidence of bilateral Ménière's disease. This feasibility study has successfully piloted methods for recruitment of hundreds of participants diagnosed with Ménière's disease. Participants actively contributed their data to a robust and extensive data collection platform. The positive outcomes from this initial feasibility study are anticipated to serve as a foundation for the future expansion of the registry. This expansion holds the potential to address a broad spectrum of request, encompassing all aspects of the nature of Ménière's disease.
Asunto(s)
Estudios de Factibilidad , Enfermedad de Meniere , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Enfermedad de Meniere/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Meniere/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Anciano , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess all available data regarding the comparative benefit of intracapsular coblation tonsillectomy (ICT) versus extracapsular coblation tonsillectomy (ECT) in children. METHODS: MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and Springerlink databases as well as other sources were searched by two independent reviewers. Controlled studies comparing ICT versus ECT in paediatric patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or recurrent tonsillitis were included. Overall postoperative pain was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were postoperative hemorrhage, diet and activity, duration of operation and tonsillar regrowth. In case of homogenous, processable data (I2 < 60%), a meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: Six studies met the inclusion criteria. The analysis showed significant difference between the two methods in terms of late postoperative pain with the ICT being less painful (SMD - 0.78, 95% CI [- 1.03, - 0.53]). However, there was no significant difference in early postoperative pain (≤ 48 h) between the two techniques (SMD - 0.18, 95% CI [- 0.47, 0.12]). All the rest of the secondary outcomes are presented in a qualitative synthesis due to published data limitations of the included studies. CONCLUSION: Intracapsular coblation tonsillectomy appears to be a less painful operation in comparison to extracapsular coblation tonsillectomy. This seems to occur due to prevention of late pain flare up that normally happens several days after the procedure (described as postoperative dip) and not due to reduced pain at the immediate postoperative period. However, as all studies published are small sized, high-quality, large-sample studies need to be performed in the future for more concrete conclusions.
Asunto(s)
Tonsilectomía , Tonsilitis , Humanos , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Tonsila Palatina , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/etiología , Tonsilitis/cirugíaRESUMEN
Nasal airway obstruction is one of the most frequent causes of revision rhinoplasty in patients after previous rhinoplasty procedure. Purpose of this study is to present the deformities and the surgical maneuvers conducted in revision rhinoplasty patients with functional complaint, anatomical sites at risk, and potential prophylactic maneuvers. This study is a retrospective chart review analysis of 46 consecutive revision rhinoplasty procedures in patients with nasal airway obstruction. Inclusion criteria were at least one previous rhinoplasty and nasal airway obstruction as the epicenter of patients' complaint. Thorough clinical examination to certify the obstruction was performed. Deformities noted were separated in three categories according to functional, cosmetic, and combination of functional and cosmetic implications. Surgical maneuvers conducted were reviewed. Deformities found were checked for statistically significant coexistences. The average patient age was 34.9 years. The mean number of previous septorhinoplasties was 1.33. Nasal ventilation obstruction mainly caused either by septum deviation or nasal valve dysfunction was identified in 91.3% of our patients. Surgical maneuvers conducted included placement of grafts in 89.1% of all cases, septoplasty in 76.1%, lateral wall support in 47.8%, and placement of spreader grafts in 39.1% of patients. The average preoperative Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score was 61 ± 15 and it improved substantially, even from month 1, postoperatively. Owing to high prevalence of nasal airway obstruction after primary or secondary rhinoplasty, we conducted the first retrospective chart review study to identify the most common deformities in revision rhinoplasty patients with nasal airway obstruction and the appropriate surgical maneuvers to address them. Septum deviation and nasal valve dysfunction were the two pillars of nasal airway obstruction in those patients.
Asunto(s)
Cartílago/trasplante , Obstrucción Nasal/cirugía , Deformidades Adquiridas Nasales/cirugía , Reoperación/métodos , Rinoplastia/efectos adversos , Trasplantes , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obstrucción Nasal/etiología , Deformidades Adquiridas Nasales/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Interposition arthroplasty of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint is a viable alternative to fusion in patients with advanced hallux rigidus. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the midterm results of a modification of the technique. METHODS: Case series of 18 interposition arthroplasties were performed on 13 female patients with Grade III-IV hallux rigidus. The technique included cheilectomy, bunionectomy when needed, minimal resection of the base of the proximal phalanx and interposition of a fascia lata allograft in the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Mean follow up was nine years (range 75-136 months). Patients were evaluated according to the AOFAS score, the ability to tip toe and their subjective satisfaction. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between preoperative (mean 43.2, range 15-83) and postoperative (mean 77.3, range 40-100) AOFAS scores (p<0.001). The patients were able to tip toe on 12 of the 18 operated feet and 9 of the 13 patients were satisfied from the operation. All dissatisfied patients had a coexistent hallux valgus deformity. CONCLUSIONS: The technique had satisfactory midterm outcomes in older patients with advanced hallux rigidus without hallux valgus. Advantages of the method are the preservation of tip toe function in most patients and a technically easy conversion to fusion when needed.