Accelerometer measures in extremely preterm and or extremely low birth weight infants and association with abnormal general movements assessments at 28- and 32-weeks postmenstrual age.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of general movements (GMs) in preterm infants is qualitative and potentially subjective. Accelerometers provide quantitative data that could overcome the problems of the GMs assessment. STUDY AIMS: To determine if quantitative measures (obtained from four tri-axial accelerometers) correlate with GMs assessments performed in the preterm period at 28- or 32-weeks postmenstrual age (PMA). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study. Tri-axial accelerometers were applied to the dorsum of each hand and foot at 28- and 32-weeks PMA. Simultaneous video recordings of the babies' spontaneous movements were made to assess GMs. SUBJECTS: Eligible babies were born <28-weeks PMA or had a birth weight of <1000 g. Babies were recruited before they reached 33-weeks PMA. OUTCOME MEASURES: GMs assessments were made offline on the video recordings. Forty-six quantitative motor parameters were calculated during the same periods of activity and compared with GMs assessments. RESULTS: At 28-weeks PMA, 24/43 (55.8 %) babies had abnormal GMs. At 32-weeks PMA, 26/57 (45.6 %) had abnormal GMs. The inter-rater reliability of the GMs was poor. When comparing MDS measures between; infants with normal and those with abnormal GMs, at 28-weeks PMA, 7/46 parameters were significantly different, and at 32-weeks PMA, 19/46 parameters were significantly different. CONCLUSION: Isolated use of quantitative movement measures, obtained from four tri-axial accelerometers before hospital discharge, correlate with the GMs assessments at both 28-weeks and 32-weeks PMA. Accelerometers may provide a useful screening tool for abnormal GMs in preterm infants and could overcome issues with inter-rater reliability.

Increased hyphal branching and growth of ectomycorrhizal fungus Lactarius rufus by the helper bacterium Paenibacillus sp.

Paenibacillus sp. EJP73 has been previously demonstrated as a mycorrhization helper bacterium (MHB) for the Lactarius rufus-Pinus sylvestris symbiosis in both laboratory and glasshouse experiments. In the present study, the effect of Paenibacillus sp. EJP73 metabolites on L. rufus EO3 pre-symbiotic growth was tested in two agar plate-based systems. Specifically, volatile metabolites were investigated using a dual plate system, in which the presence of strain EJP73 resulted in a significant negative effect on L. rufus EO3 hyphal radial growth but enhanced hyphal branching and reduced internode distance. Soluble metabolites produced by strain EJP73 were tested on L. rufus EO3 growth in single-agar plate assays by incorporating bacterial cell-free whole or molecular weight fraction spent broth into the agar. Whole spent broth had a negative effect on hyphal growth, whereas a low molecular weight fraction (100-1,000) promoted colony radial growth. Headspace and spent broth analysis of strain EJP73 cultures revealed 2,5-diisopropylpyrazine to be the most significant component. Synthesised 2,5-diisopropylpyrazine and elevated CO2 (2,000 ppm) were tested as specific volatile metabolites in the dual plate system, but neither produced the response shown when strain EJP73 was present. Increased pre-symbiotic hyphal branching leading to increased likelihood of plant infection may be an important MHB mechanism for strain EJP73. Although the precise signal molecules could not be identified, the work suggests a number of metabolites may work synergistically to increase L. rufus root colonisation.

Transferring preterm infants from incubators to open cots at 1600 g: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects on weight gain and temperature control of transferring preterm infants from incubators to open cots at a weight of 1600 g versus a weight of 1800 g. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: One tertiary and two regional neonatal units in public hospitals in Queensland, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 182 preterm infants born with a birth weight less than 1600 g, who were at least 48 h old; had not required ventilation or continuous positive airways pressure within the last 48 h; were medically stable with no oxygen requirement, or significant apnoea or bradycardia; did not require phototherapy; and were enterally fed with an intake (breast milk/formula) of at least 60 ml/kg/day. INTERVENTIONS: Transfer into an open cot at 1600 or 1800 g. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were temperature stability and average daily weight gain over the first 14 days following transfer to an open cot. RESULTS: 90 infants in the 1600 g group and 92 infants in the 1800 g group were included in the analysis. Over the first 72 h, more infants in the 1800 g group had temperatures <36.4°C than the 1600 g group (p=0.03). From post-transfer to discharge, the 1600 g group had more temperatures >37.1°C (p=0.02). Average daily weight gain in the 1600 g group was 17.07 (SD±4.5) g/kg/day and in the 1800 g group, 13.97 (SD±4.7) g/kg/day (p=<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Medically stable, preterm infants can be transferred to open cots at a birth weight of 1600 g without any significant adverse effects on temperature stability or weight gain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12606000518561 (http://www.anzctr.org.au).

Gas exchange during perfluorocarbon liquid immersion: life-support for the ex utero fetus.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory mortality and morbidity remain major consequences of extreme prematurity. Percutaneous transfer of oxygen and carbon dioxide is possible in the newborn human. Perfluorocarbon (PFC) liquids have excellent oxygen and carbon dioxide carrying capacity. Animals can breath immersed in perfluorocarbon liquids and maintain adequate gas exchange. Our hypothesis is that the combination of spontaneous tidal perfluorocarbon breathing and respiration through the skin immersed in perfluorocarbon will allow adequate gas exchange in the preterm newborn. In this pilot study we aimed to observe the effects of immersion in FC-77 perfluorocarbon liquid on the preterm lamb. PILOT DATA: Four preterm lambs at 100-115 days gestation were delivered using a modified EXIT procedure. Immediately after complete delivery, the catheterised lamb was immersed in warm, oxygenated FC-77 perfluorocarbon liquid. Physiological monitoring was done for up to 60 min. All lambs were warmed adequately and seemed to have centrally intact circulation initially. All had little or no respiratory effort and there was no appreciable lung expansion. All had severe respiratory acidosis. DISCUSSION: For the provision of immediate ex utero care to the 'fetus' there are three requirements: adequate gas exchange surfaces and sufficient oxygen and carbon dioxide gradients, a functioning circulation, and an environment capable of keeping the lamb warm (thus minimising metabolic demand, oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production). In this pilot study the greatest initial problem was the severe and rapidly worsening respiratory acidosis. The major problem was a lack of respiratory drive. No lung expansion from the outset would yield zero contribution to gas exchange from the lungs. An intact central circulation does not necessarily mean that the pulmonary circulation, respiratory drive and/or the skin circulation are adequate. For adequate gas exchange to occur it will require a 'breathing' animal with expanded alveoli. If the transition from the normal in utero state to immersion in PFC was immediate, and lung expansion was achieved, it could still be possible to achieve adequate gas exchange through the skin and lungs of the extremely preterm newborn. HYPOTHESIS: Given the potential for gas exchange across the skin of the extremely preterm infant we hypothesise that the immersion of extremely preterm infants in PFC liquid will allow optimal percutaneous gas exchange to occur. Given some lung gas exchange with less injurious liquid ventilation (spontaneous or mechanical) we hypothesise that the combination of skin and lung gas exchange will provide sufficient gas exchange to support life.

Transfer of preterm infants from incubator to open cot at lower versus higher body weight.

BACKGROUND: The use of incubators in helping to maintain a thermoneutral environment for preterm infants has become routine practice in neonatal nurseries. As one of the key criteria for discharging preterm infants from nurseries is their ability to maintain temperature; the infant will need to make the transition from incubator to open cot at some time before discharge. The timing of this transition is important because, when an infant is challenged by cold, the infant attempts to increase its heat production to maintain body temperature. The increase in energy expenditure may affect weight gain. The practice of transferring infants from incubators to open cots usually occurs once a weight of around 1700 - 1800 g has been reached; however, this practice varies widely among neonatal units. This target weight appears to be largely based on tradition or the personal experience of clinicians, with little consideration of the infant's weight or gestational age at birth. OBJECTIVES: The main objective was to assess the effects on weight gain and temperature control of a policy of transferring preterm infants from incubator to open cot at lower versus higher body weight. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were undertaken of MEDLINE from April 2007 back to 1950, CINAHL from April 2007 back to 1982 and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2007). The title and abstract of each retrieved study were examined to assess eligibility. If there was uncertainty, the full paper was examined. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials in which preterm infants were allocated to a policy of transfer from incubators to open cots at a lower body weight versus at a higher body weight. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Quality assessments and data extraction for included trials were conducted independently by the reviewers. Data for individual trial results were analysed using relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD). Results are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Due to insufficient data, meta-analysis could not be undertaken. MAIN RESULTS: Five studies were identified as potentially eligible for inclusion in this review. Three studies were excluded as neither random nor quasi-random allocation to the exposure was employed. Two small quasi-randomised studies, involving 74 preterm infants are included in this review. These studies compared the transfer of infants to open cots at 1600 - 1700 g vs. 1800- 1900 g, and 1700 g vs. 1800 g. Data for only two prespecified outcomes could be included in this review. No statistically significant difference was shown for either return to incubator [one trial (N = 60) RR 2.00; 95% CI 0.40 to 10.11] or daily weight gain measured in g/kg/day [one trial (N = 14) MD 1.00 g/kg/day; 95% CI -2.89, 4.89]. Due to insufficient data, meta-analysis was not performed and effects on clinically important outcomes could not be adequately assessed. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is currently little evidence from randomised trials to inform practice on the preferred weight for transferring preterm infants from incubators to open cots. There is a need for larger randomised controlled trials to address this deficiency.

Prophylactic systemic antibiotics to reduce morbidity and mortality in neonates with central venous catheters.

BACKGROUND: The use of central venous catheters is recognised as a risk factor for nosocomial infection. Prophylactic antibiotics may be effective in preventing catheter-related blood stream infection in newborns but may also have the undesirable effect of promoting the emergence of resistant strains of micro-organisms. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of prophylactic antibiotics on mortality and morbidity in neonates with central venous catheters. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were done of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group Specialised Register, MEDLINE from 1950 to April 2007, CINAHL from 1982 to April 2007, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 2 2007). Previous reviews (including cross references) were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials or quasi-randomised controlled trials of adequate quality in which either individual newborn infants or clusters of infants were randomised to receive prophylactic antibiotics (not including antifungals) versus placebo or no treatment. Infants must have had central venous catheters, been full term infants less than 28 days old or preterm infants up to 44 weeks (postmenstrual) corrected age. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Criteria and methods used to assess the methodological quality of the trials: standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration and its Neonatal Review Group were used. The review authors extracted data independently. Attempts were made to contact study investigators for additional information as required. MAIN RESULTS: Three small studies have been included in this review. Prophylactic antibiotics in neonates with central venous catheters had no effect on overall mortality (typical RR 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.31, 1.51). Prophylactic antibiotics in neonates with central venous catheters decreased the rate of proven bacterial sepsis (typical RR 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.18, 0.82). Prophylactic antibiotics in neonates with central venous catheters decreased the rate of suspected or proven bacterial septicaemia (typical RR 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.20, 0.78). No resistant organisms colonising infants were identified in any of the studies. No pooled data were available for other important outcome measures such as chronic lung disease or neurodevelopmental outcome. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic systemic antibiotics in neonates with a central venous catheter reduces the rate of proven or suspected septicaemia. However, this may not be clinically important in the face of no significant difference in overall mortality and the lack of data on long-term neurodevelopmental outcome. Furthermore, there is a lack of data pertaining to the potentially significant disadvantages of this approach such as the selection of resistant organisms. The routine use of prophylactic antibiotics in infants with central venous catheters in neonatal units cannot currently be recommended.

Prophylactic antibiotics to reduce morbidity and mortality in neonates with umbilical artery catheters.

BACKGROUND: Umbilical artery catheters are often used in unwell neonates. Infection related to the use of these catheters may cause significant morbidity and mortality. The use of prophylactic antibiotics has been advocated for all newborns with umbilical artery catheters in order to reduce the risk of colonisation and acquired infection. Countering this is the possibility that harm, such as the emergence of antibiotic resistant organisms, may outweigh benefit. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to assess whether prophylactic antibiotics reduce mortality and morbidity in neonates with umbilical artery catheters. Two different policies regarding the prophylactic use of antibiotics in neonates with umbilical artery catheters were reviewed: 1) a policy of prophylactic antibiotics for the duration of catheterisation (or other fixed duration of antibiotic treatment) versus placebo or no treatment among neonates with umbilical artery catheters; 2) a policy of continuing versus discontinuing prophylactic antibiotics among neonates with umbilical artery catheters who had been started on antibiotics at the time of catheterisation but whose initial cultures to rule out sepsis are negative. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE (January 1950 to May 2007), CINAHL (1982 to May 2007), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2007), the Cochrane Neonatal Group Specialised Register and reference lists of articles were searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and some non-randomised (i.e., quasi-randomised trials) controlled trials of adequate quality in which newborn infants with umbilical artery catheters are randomised to receive prophylactic antibiotics versus placebo or no treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewer authors independently assessed trial quality. MAIN RESULTS: Two quasi-randomised trials have been included. However, given their poor quality, we have not pooled the results. There were no statistically significant differences in important outcomes in either study. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence from randomised trials to support or refute the use of prophylactic antibiotics when umbilical artery catheters are inserted in newborn infants, and no evidence to support or refute continuing antibiotics once initial cultures rule out infection in newborn infants with umbilical artery catheters.

Prophylactic antibiotics to reduce morbidity and mortality in ventilated newborn infants.

BACKGROUND: Intubation is associated with bacterial colonisation of the respiratory tract and, therefore, may increase the risk of acquiring an infection. The infection may prolong the need for mechanical ventilation and increase the risk of chronic lung disease. The use of prophylactic antibiotics has been advocated for all mechanically ventilated newborns in order to reduce the risk of colonisation and the acquisition of infection. However, there is the possibility that the harm this may cause might outweigh the benefit. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of prophylactic antibiotics on mortality and morbidity in intubated, ventilated newborn infants who are not known to have infection. In separate comparisons, two different policies regarding the prophylactic use of antibiotics in intubated, ventilated infants were reviewed: 1) among infants who have been intubated for mechanical ventilation, a policy of prophylactic antibiotics for the duration of intubation versus placebo or no treatment 2) among intubated, ventilated infants who have been started on antibiotics at the time of intubation but whose initial cultures to rule out sepsis were negative, a policy of continuing versus discontinuing prophylactic antibiotics. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE (January 1950 to March 2007), CINAHL (1982 to March 2007), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2007), the Cochrane Neonatal Group Specialised Register and reference lists of articles were searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of sufficient quality in which mechanically ventilated newborn infants are randomised to receive prophylactic antibiotics versus placebo or no treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality. MAIN RESULTS: Two studies met the criteria for inclusion in this review. One was of insufficient quality to draw any meaningful conclusions. The other was of fair quality and found no significant differences between treatment and control groups in any of the reported outcomes, however, the rates of septicaemia were not reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence from randomised trials to support or refute the use of prophylactic antibiotics when starting mechanical ventilation in newborn infants, or to support or refute continuing antibiotics once initial cultures have ruled out infection in mechanically ventilated newborn infants.

Cup feeding versus other forms of supplemental enteral feeding for newborn infants unable to fully breastfeed.

BACKGROUND: Breast milk provides optimal nutrition for newborn infants, and the ideal way for infants to receive breast milk is through suckling at the breast. Unfortunately, this may not always be possible, as there are numerous reasons why a newborn infant may not be able to breastfeed and, as a result, require supplemental feeding. Currently, there are a variety of ways in which newborn infants can receive supplemental feeds. Traditionally, bottles and nasogastric tubes have been used; however, more recently, cup feeding has become a popular practice in many nurseries in an attempt to improve breastfeeding rates. There is no consistency to guide the choice of supplementation. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of cup feeding versus other forms of supplemental enteral feeding on weight gain and achievement of successful breastfeeding in newborn infants who are unable to fully breastfeed. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2006), CINAHL (1982 - April 2006) and MEDLINE (1966 - April 2006). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing cup feeding to other forms of enteral feeding for the supplementation of newborn infants. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Quality assessments and data extraction for included trials were conducted independently by the review authors. Outcomes reported from these studies were: weight gain, proportion not breastfeeding at hospital discharge, proportion not feeding at three months of age, proportion not feeding at six months of age, proportion not fully feeding at hospital discharge, proportion not fully breastfeeding at three months of age, proportion not fully breastfeeding at six months of age, average time per feed (minutes), length of stay and physiological events of instability such as bradycardia, apnea, and low oxygen saturation. For continuous variables such as weight gain, mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were reported. For categorical outcomes such as mortality, the relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals were reported. MAIN RESULTS: Four studies were eligible for inclusion. The experimental intervention was cup feeding and the control intervention was bottle feeding in all four studies included in this review. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of not breastfeeding at hospital discharge in three included studies (typical RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.62, 1.09) and not breastfeeding at three months in two included studies (typical RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.76, 1.03) or six months for the one study that reported this outcome (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78, 1.05). There was a statistically significant difference in not fully breastfeeding at hospital discharge (from three included studies) in favour of cup feeding (typical RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61, 0.92). However, this was not statistically significant at three months (one study, RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.88, 1.58) or six months (one study, RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.89, 1.92). There was no statistically significant difference in weight gain from one study that reported this outcome (MD -0.60, 95% CI -3.21, 2.01). In the one study that assessed it, there was a significantly increased length of hospital stay in the cup fed infants [mean difference between groups was 10.1 days (95% CI 3.9, 16.3)]. Time to full breastfeeding was not assessed in any study. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Cup feeding cannot be recommended over bottle feeding as a supplement to breastfeeding because it confers no significant benefit in maintaining breastfeeding beyond hospital discharge and carries the unacceptable consequence of a longer stay in hospital.

Disposable nappies for preventing napkin dermatitis in infants.

BACKGROUND: Napkin dermatitis is a common condition that occurs in otherwise healthy infants. It causes discomfort to infants, anxiety to parents and caregivers and contributes to the load on the health care system. A large variety of napkins, both disposable and non-disposable, are available. Evidence is required to assist carers and health care workers in making informed decisions when balancing the pros and cons of different napkin choices. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether disposable napkins prevent napkin dermatitis in infants. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Skin Group Specialised Register (up to June 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2004), MEDLINE (from 1966 to November 2004), EMBASE (from 1980 to February 2003) and CINAHL (from 1982 to November 2004). We searched reference lists of articles. We contacted lead investigators in the area and companies that manufacture disposable napkins for access to unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials in which disposable napkins were compared with other types of disposable napkins or non-disposable napkins, in infants up to two years of age, for preventing napkin dermatitis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted data. The same two authors independently assessed trials for methodological quality. Attempts were made to contact trial authors of the trials identified for clarification of methods and results of published trials. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 28 studies of the effects of various napkin types on napkin dermatitis. Seventeen studies from nine reports were included. Eleven studies were excluded due to methodology that did not fit the inclusion criteria of this review. Due to the poor reporting of methodology and results of the studies found in this review, there were no quantitative data available for analysis (or meta-analysis). Although the included studies appeared to favour cellulose-core disposable napkins over cloth, absorbent gelling material over cellulose-only core napkins, breathable outer shell over occlusive outer shell napkins and linings impregnated with formulations over plain linings, all of these studies were open to bias due to flawed methodology. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is not enough evidence from good quality randomised controlled trials to support or refute the use and type of disposable napkins for the prevention of napkin dermatitis in infants.

Topical vitamin A, or its derivatives, for treating and preventing napkin dermatitis in infants.

BACKGROUND: Napkin dermatitis (nappy or diaper rash) is a non-specific term used to describe inflammatory eruptions (rashes) in the napkin area. Most infants develop napkin dermatitis at least once during their infancy. Topical vitamin A has been suggested as a treatment for napkin dermatitis. OBJECTIVES: To determine if treatment with topical vitamin A is successful in either preventing napkin dermatitis, or producing resolution or decreasing the severity of napkin dermatitis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register (May 2005); Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2005); Ovid MEDLINE from 1966 to August 2005; EMBASE (2003 to May 2005); Ovid OLDMEDLINE (1950 to 1965); and CINAHL (1982 to August 2005). We also searched reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials, where the topical application of medication containing vitamin A (or its derivatives) was compared with either placebo, no treatment or other topical medication, for the prevention or treatment of napkin dermatitis in infants aged from zero to two years. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors (AJD and MWD) identified and checked titles and abstracts obtained from the searches, and reviewed the full text where necessary. They decided which trials met the inclusion criteria, and recorded their methodological quality. They assessed studies as either adequate, unclear or inadequate using the following key criteria: (a) randomisation (method of generation and concealment of allocation); (b) blinding; (c) loss to follow-up. MAIN RESULTS: We did not find any studies for the treatment of napkin dermatitis. We found only one study comparing the use of topical application of medication containing vitamin A, with another topical medication or placebo, to prevent napkin dermatitis. This included study, of 114 newborn infants, reported no significant differences between groups with regard to the severity or duration of napkin dermatitis. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of napkin dermatitis there is no evidence to support or refute the use of topical vitamin A preparations. For the prevention of napkin dermatitis there is no evidence to suggest that topical vitamin A alters the development of napkin dermatitis. Further RCTs are required to determine whether topical vitamin A is efficacious in treating or preventing napkin dermatitis.

Continuous infusion versus intermittent flushing to prevent loss of function of peripheral intravenous catheters used for drug administration in newborn infants.

BACKGROUND: The use of peripheral intravenous cannulae is common in newborn babies. Many of them require an intravenous line only for medications and not for fluid. Currently there is little uniformity in methods used to maintain cannula patency. OBJECTIVES: The object of this review was to determine which method was better for maintaining intravenous lines used in neonates for intravenous medication only: intermittent flushing or continuous infusion SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2004), CINAHL (from 1982 to June 2004) and MEDLINE (from 1966 to June 2004) . SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing continuous infusion to intermittent flushing to maintain patency of intravenous cannulas. Units of randomisation might include individual catheters or individual babies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: Two studies were eligible for inclusion. In one study only one of our primary outcomes was available: the duration of cannula patency for the first cannula used per infant was slightly longer in the continuous infusion group, but not significantly so, with a mean difference of -4.3 hours (95% CI -18.2 to 9.7). In the second study, only one of our primary outcomes was available: the mean (SD) number cannulas used per infant in the first 48 hours was less in the intermittent flush group with a mean difference of -0.76 cannulas (95% CI -1.37 to -0.15). No results were available for any of our other primary outcomes: in the published report, results were reported per catheter rather than per infant, a number of infants received more than one intravenous catheter (39 infants received an unknown number of catheters). The overall duration of cannula patency was significantly longer in the intermittent flush group with a mean duration of patency in the intermittent flush group of 2.1 days (SD 1.0) compared with the continuous infusion group where the mean duration of patency was 1.0 days (SD 0.5) - Student's t test P value 0.0003. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult to draw reliable conclusions given the way the data were analysed and reported in the two included studies. The reliability of the results is uncertain. However, given the caution in interpreting these data, it should also be noted that the use of intermittent flushes was not associated in either study with a decreased cannula life or any other disadvantages, thus lending some support for the use of intermittent flushing of cannulas in a selected population in neonatal nurseries.

Prophylactic antibiotics to reduce morbidity and mortality in neonates with umbilical venous catheters.

BACKGROUND: Umbilical venous catheters are often used in unwell neonates. Infection related to the use of these catheters may cause significant morbidity and mortality. The use of prophylactic antibiotics has been advocated for newborns with umbilical venous catheters in order to reduce the risk of colonisation and acquired infection. Countering this is the possibility that harm may outweigh benefit. Prophylactic antibiotics may be effective in preventing catheter-related blood stream infection, but may have the undesirable effect of promoting the emergence of resistant strains of micro-organisms. A policy of prophylactic antibiotic use should take into account this possibility, and has been used as a basis for arguing against its implementation. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to assess whether prophylactic antibiotics, in neonates with umbilical venous catheters, reduce mortality and morbidity. In separate comparisons, we planned to review two different policies regarding the prophylactic use of antibiotics in neonates with umbilical venous catheters: 1) Among neonates with umbilical venous catheters, a policy of prophylactic antibiotics for the duration of catheterisation (or other fixed duration of antibiotic treatment) versus placebo or no treatment; 2) Among neonates with umbilical venous catheters who had been started on antibiotics at the time of catheterisation, but whose initial cultures to rule out sepsis are negative, a policy of continuing versus discontinuing prophylactic antibiotics. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE (January 1966 to April 2005), CINAHL (1982 to April 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2005). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials or quasi-randomised trials in which newborn infants with umbilical venous catheters are randomised to receive prophylactic antibiotics versus placebo or no treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality. MAIN RESULTS: One study, of poor quality, met the criteria for inclusion in this review. Twenty-nine term infants, who had umbilical venous catheters inserted specifically for transfusion procedures for hyperbilirubinaemia or polycythaemia, allocated non-randomly (quasi-randomised - alternate allocation) to treatment (n = 15) or control (n = 14) groups. Those in the treatment group received penicillin and gentamicin for three days. 5/15 infants given antibiotics and 5/14 control infants having positive blood cultures three days after catheter insertion. All positive blood cultures were considered contaminated, due to lack of corroborating clinical and haematological evidence of infection. Therefore, no infants were identified with evidence of septicaemia. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence from randomised trials to support or refute the use of prophylactic antibiotics when umbilical venous catheters are inserted in newborn infants. There is no evidence to support or refute continuing antibiotics once initial cultures rule out infection in newborn infants with umbilical venous catheters.

Partial liquid ventilation for preventing death and morbidity in adults with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Acute lung injury (ALI), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), are syndromes of severe respiratory failure. Adults with ALI or ARDS have high mortality and significant morbidity. Partial liquid ventilation (PLV) may be better (i.e., cause less lung damage) for these patients than other forms of respiratory support. Uncontrolled studies in adults have shown improvement in gas exchange and lung compliance with partial liquid ventilation. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether partial liquid ventilation reduces morbidity and mortality in adults with ALI or ARDS. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2004; MEDLINE (1966 to May 2004); and CINAHL (1982 to May 2004); intensive care journals and conference proceedings; reference lists and unpublished literature. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials which compared partial liquid ventilation with other forms of ventilation, in adults (16 years old or greater) with ALI or ARDS, reporting one or more of the following: mortality; duration of mechanical ventilation, respiratory support, oxygen therapy, stay in the intensive care unit, or stay in hospital; infection; long term cognitive impairment or health related quality of life; long term lung function; or cost. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of the relevant studies and extracted the data from the included studies. MAIN RESULTS: Problems with the inadequacy of the primary report of the one included study do not allow us to report any quantitative results for patients with ALI or ARDS. The only outcome we considered to be of clinical significance and reported for all enrolled patients (i.e., patients with ALI and ARDS and less severe respiratory insufficiency) was 28 day mortality. There was no statistically significant difference between groups for this outcome with a relative risk for 28 day mortality in the PLV group of 1.15 (95% confidence intervals of 0.64 to 2.10). REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence from randomized controlled trials to support or refute the use of partial liquid ventilation in adults with ALI or ARDS; adequately powered, high quality randomized controlled trials are still needed to assess its efficacy. Clinically relevant outcome measures should be assessed (especially mortality at discharge and later, duration of respiratory support and hospital stay, and long term cognitive and quality of life outcomes) and the studies should be published in full.

Albumin infusion for low serum albumin in preterm newborn infants.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous albumin infusion to treat hypoalbuminaemia is used in intensive care nurseries. Hypoalbuminaemia occurs in a number of clinical situations including prematurity, the acutely unwell infant, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), chronic lung disease (CLD), necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), intracranial haemorrhage, hydrops fetalis and oedema. Fluid overload is a potential side effect of albumin administration. Albumin is a blood product and therefore carries the potential risk of infection and adverse reactions. Albumin is also a scarce and expensive resource. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to assess whether albumin infusions, in preterm neonates with low serum albumin, reduces mortality and morbidity. A secondary objective was to assess whether albumin infusion is associated with significant side effects. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were made of MEDLINE from 1966 to April 2004, CINAHL from 1982 to April 2004 and the current Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library issue 1, 2004). Previous reviews (including cross references) and abstracts were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials in which individual patients were allocated to albumin infusion versus control were included. Cross-over studies were excluded. Quasi randomised trials were excluded. Participants were preterm infants who had hypoalbuminaemia. Types of interventions included albumin infusion versus placebo (e.g. crystalloid) or no treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The reviewers worked independently to search for trials for inclusion and to assess methodological quality. Studies were assessed using the following key criteria: blinding of randomisation, blinding of intervention, completeness of follow up and blinding of outcome measurement. MAIN RESULTS: Only two small studies were found for inclusion in this review and only one reported clinically relevant outcomes - it found no significant differences for our primary outcome measure of death (RR 1.5 [95% confidence interval 0.3 - 7.43]) or secondary outcome measures of intraventricular haemorrhage, patent ductus arteriosus, necrotising enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, duration of mechanical ventilation and duration of oxygen therapy. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of evidence from randomised trials to determine whether the routine use of albumin infusion, in preterm neonates with low serum albumin, reduces mortality or morbidity, and no evidence to assess whether albumin infusion is associated with significant side effects. There is a need for good quality, double-blind randomised controlled trials to assess the safety and efficacy of albumin infusions in preterm neonates with low serum albumin.

Prophylactic antibiotics to reduce morbidity and mortality in neonates with umbilical artery catheters.

BACKGROUND: Umbilical artery catheters are often used in unwell neonates. Infection related to the use of these catheters may cause significant morbidity and mortality. The use of prophylactic antibiotics has been advocated for all newborns with umbilical artery catheters in order to reduce the risk of colonisation and acquired infection. Countering this is the possibility that harm may outweigh benefit. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to assess whether prophylactic antibiotics, in neonates with umbilical artery catheters, reduce mortality and morbidity. In separate comparisons, we planned to review two different policies regarding the prophylactic use of antibiotics in neonates with umbilical artery catheters: 1) among neonates with umbilical artery catheters, a policy of prophylactic antibiotics for the duration of catheterisation (or other fixed duration of antibiotic treatment) versus placebo or no treatment; 2) among neonates with umbilical artery catheters who had been started on antibiotics at the time of catheterisation but whose initial cultures to rule out sepsis are negative, a policy of continuing versus discontinuing prophylactic antibiotics. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE (January 1966 to February 2004), CINAHL (1982 to February 2004), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2004), the Cochrane Neonatal Group Specialised Register and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of adequate quality in which newborn infants with umbilical artery catheters are randomised to receive prophylactic antibiotics versus placebo or no treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality. MAIN RESULTS: No study met the criteria for inclusion in this review. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence from randomised trials to support or refute the use of prophylactic antibiotics when umbilical artery catheters are inserted in newborn infants, or to support or refute continuing antibiotics once initial cultures rule out infection in newborn infants with umbilical artery catheters.

Predicting the need for ventilation in term and near-term neonates.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the need for respiratory support can be predicted by oxygen requirement within the first 72 h in term and near-term infants. METHODS: To mimic the population of infants that would often be delivered outside a tertiary centre we studied a retrospective cohort of infants > or = 32 weeks requiring oxygen, divided into three groups: cot oxygen only, nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) only, or intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV). We recorded each infant's peak fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2)--i.e. FiO2 in the first 72 h in the cot oxygen only group or maximum FiO2 prior to commencing the highest level of respiratory support. The peak FiO2 was used as a diagnostic test to predict any respiratory support or IPPV--sensitivity and specificity were calculated and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves plotted (FiO2 0.21-1.00) to identify the best balance point for prediction. RESULTS: The cohort included 592 infants: 516 cot oxygen only, 46 NCPAP only and 30 IPPV. The proportion ventilated increased with increasing peak FiO2--above 0.45 the proportion of infants ventilated exceeded 50%. To predict any respiratory support, the cut-point balancing sensitivity and specificity was a FiO2 > or = 0.35-58/136 required respiratory support (sensitivity = 0.76, specificity = 0.85, positive predictive value (PPV) = 43%, negative predictive value (NPV) = 96%). To predict IPPV the cut-point was a FiO2 > or = 0.5-28/47 treated with IPPV (sensitivity = 0.93, specificity = 0.97, PPV = 60%, NPV = 100%). CONCLUSION: The need for respiratory support can be predicted by oxygen requirement within the first 72 h in term and near-term infants with reasonable sensitivity and excellent specificity.

Partial liquid ventilation for the prevention of mortality and morbidity in paediatric acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Acute lung injury, and acute respiratory distress syndrome, are syndromes of severe respiratory failure. Children with acute lung injury or acute respiratory syndrome have high mortality and significant morbidity. Partial liquid ventilation is proposed as a less injurious form of respiratory support for these children. Uncontrolled studies in adults have shown improvement in gas exchange and lung compliance with partial liquid ventilation A single uncontrolled study in six children with acute respiratory syndrome showed some improvement in gas exchange during three hours of partial liquid ventilation. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether partial liquid ventilation reduces either mortality or morbidity, or both, in children with acute lung injury or acute respiratory syndrome. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), The Cochrane Library issue 2, 2003; MEDLINE (1966 to April 2003); and CINAHL (1982 to April 2003); intensive care journals and conference proceedings; reference lists and 'grey literature'. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials which compared partial liquid ventilation with other forms of ventilation, in children (28 days - 18 years) with acute lung injury or acute respiratory syndrome, reporting one or more of the following: mortality; duration of mechanical ventilation, respiratory support, oxygen therapy, stay in the intensive care unit, or stay in hospital; infection; or long term cognitive impairment or neurodevelopmental progress or other long term morbidities. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of the relevant studies and extracted the data from the included studies. MAIN RESULTS: Only one study enrolling 182 patients (only reported as an abstract in conference proceedings) was identified and found eligible for inclusion: the authors report only limited results. The trial was stopped prematurely and therefore under-powered to detect any significant differences. The only outcome of clinical significance available was 28 day mortality: there was no statistically significant difference between groups with a relative risk for 28 day mortality in the partial liquid ventilation group of 1.54 (95% confidence intervals of 0.82 to 2.9). REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence from randomized controlled trials to support or refute the use of partial liquid ventilation in children with acute lung injury or acute respiratory syndrome: adequately powered, high quality randomized controlled trials are still needed to assess its efficacy. Clinically relevant outcome measures should be assessed (mortality at discharge and later, duration of respiratory support and hospital stay, and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes) and the studies should be published in full.

Transfer of preterm infants from incubator to open cot at lower versus higher body weight.

BACKGROUND: The use of incubators in helping to maintain a thermoneutral environment for preterm infants has become routine practice in neonatal nurseries. As one of the key criteria for discharging preterm infants from nurseries is their ability to maintain temperature, the infant will need to make the transition from incubator to open cot at some time before discharge. The timing of this transition is important because when an infant is challenged by cold, the infant attempts to increase its heat production to maintain body temperature. The increase in energy expenditure may affect weight gain. The practice of transferring infants from incubators to open cots usually occurs once a weight of around 1700-1800 g has been reached; however, this practice varies widely between neonatal units. This preferred weight mark appears to be largely based on tradition or the personal experience of clinicians, with little consideration of the infant's weight or gestational age at birth. OBJECTIVES: The main objective was to assess the effects on weight gain and temperature control of a policy of transferring preterm infants from incubator to open cot at lower versus higher body weight. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were undertaken of MEDLINE from June 2003 back to 1966, CINAHL from June 2003 back to 1987 and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2003). The title and abstract of each retrieved study were examined to assess eligibility. If there was uncertainty, the full paper was examined. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials in which preterm infants were randomly allocated to a policy of transfer from incubators to open cots at a lower body weight versus at a higher body weight. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Quality assessments and data extraction for included trials were conducted independently by the reviewers. Data for individual trial results were analysed using relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD). Results are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Due to insufficient data, meta-analysis could not be undertaken. MAIN RESULTS: Four studies were identified as potentially eligible for inclusion in this review. Two studies were excluded as random allocation to the exposure was not employed. One study is pending, awaiting additional information from the authors. Therefore, one study involving 60 preterm infants, employing a matched-pairs design, which compared the transfer of infants to open cots at 1700 g versus 1800 g, is included in this review. Only two outcomes could be included from this study; return to incubator and daily weight gain. No statistically significant difference was shown for either return to incubator (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.40 to 10.11) or daily weight gain [MD 4.00 g/day (95% CI -5.23, 13.23)]. Due to small numbers, effects on clinically important outcomes could not be adequately assessed. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: There is currently little evidence from randomised trials to inform practice on the preferred weight for transferring preterm infants from incubators to open cots. There is a need for larger randomised controlled trials to address this deficiency.