Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Biomed Opt ; 17(8): 081420, 2012 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23224181

RESUMEN

Frequent monitoring of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients enables timely treatment adjustments and improved outcomes. Currently this is not feasible due to a shortage of rheumatologists. An optical spectral transmission device is presented for objective assessment of joint inflammation in RA patients, while improving diagnostic accuracy and clinical workflow. A cross-sectional, nonrandomized observational study was performed with this device. In the study, 77 proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints in 67 patients have been analyzed. Inflammation of these PIP joints was also assessed by a rheumatologist with a score varying from 1 (not inflamed) to 5 (severely inflamed). Out of 77 measurements, 27 were performed in moderate to strongly inflamed PIP joints. Comparison between the clinical assessment and an optical measurement showed a correlation coefficient r=0.63, p<0.001, 95% CI [0.47, 0.75], and a ROC curve (AUC=0.88) that shows a relative good specificity and sensitivity. Optical spectral transmission measurements in a single joint correlate with clinical assessment of joint inflammation, and therefore might be useful in monitoring joint inflammation in RA patients.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Artritis Reumatoide/fisiopatología , Diagnóstico por Computador/métodos , Articulaciones de los Dedos/fisiopatología , Nefelometría y Turbidimetría/métodos , Análisis Espectral/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Articulaciones , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
2.
Pain ; 153(2): 373-381, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22119338

RESUMEN

A novel device was developed that measured local electrical skin resistance and generated pulsed local electrical currents that were delivered across the skin around the knee for patients with osteoarthritis (termed eBrace TENS). Currents were delivered using an electrode array of 16 small circular electrode elements so that stimulation could be spatially targeted. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of spatially targeted transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) to points of low skin resistance on pain relief and mobility in osteoarthritis of the knee (OAK). A randomised, controlled, 3-arm, parallel-group trial was designed that compared pain and function following a 30 to 45 minute intervention of TENS at specific locations depending on the local electrical skin resistance. Pain intensity by the visual analogue scale (VAS), 6-minute walk test, maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), and range-of-motion (ROM) were the primary outcomes. Lowest-resistance TENS reduced pain intensity during walking relative to resting baseline compared with random TENS (95% confidence interval of the difference: -20.8mm, -1.26 mm). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in distance during the walk test, maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) or range-of-motion (ROM) measures or WOMAC scores. In conclusion, we provide evidence that use of a matrix electrode that spatially targets strong nonpainful TENS for 30 to 45 minutes at sites of low resistance can reduce pain intensity at rest and during walking.


Asunto(s)
Artralgia/terapia , Electrodiagnóstico/métodos , Respuesta Galvánica de la Piel/fisiología , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/terapia , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/métodos , Anciano , Artralgia/etiología , Artralgia/fisiopatología , Electrodiagnóstico/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/complicaciones , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/instrumentación , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 28(3): 354-9, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20406615

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In the 18 month "alendronate or alfacalcidol in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis"-trial (STOP-trial) patients with rheumatic diseases who started glucocorticoids were randomised to anti-osteoporosis therapy with either daily alendronate (10 mg) or alfacalcidol (1 microg). In the present observational open follow-up study of the STOP-trial, we report the long-term effects of risk factors on the incidence and pattern of vertebral fractures, assessed using the Genant method. RESULTS: Of the 201 included patients in the STOP-trial, 163 completed the trial and of those 116 underwent a follow-up radiography of the spine. Twenty-eight patients had developed one or more new vertebral fractures since the end of the STOP-trial. The majority of fractures was wedge shaped and the deformities were intermediate to severe in both the former alendronate and alfacalcidol group. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that STOP-trial medication and presence of pre-existing fractures did not predict development of new fractures, whereas age and cumulative glucocorticoid-dose did. CONCLUSIONS: During the follow-up 2.7 years after the STOP-trial both in the former alendronate and alfacalcidol group 24% of the patients underwent at least one new vertebral fracture. This underlines that prevention of vertebral fractures remains a clinical challenge, even when anti-osteoporosis drugs are prescribed.


Asunto(s)
Alendronato/administración & dosificación , Hidroxicolecalciferoles/administración & dosificación , Osteoporosis/inducido químicamente , Prednisona/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/inducido químicamente , Anciano , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Factores de Riesgo , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/epidemiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/prevención & control , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
6.
J Rheumatol ; 34(5): 1051-7, 2007 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17407214

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relation of changes in measures of bone turnover and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and total hip over 18 months in a double-blinded, randomized trial, comparing the effect of alfacalcidol (101 patients) versus alendronate (100 patients) on BMD in patients who recently started treatment with glucocorticoids for various rheumatic diseases. METHODS: Associations between changes in serum procollagen type I C-propeptide (P1CP), fasting urine N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx), serum calcium, parathyroid hormone (PTH), osteocalcin, and change from baseline in BMD over 18 months were explored with regression and correlation analyses. RESULTS: In both treatment groups, there was a statistically significant decrease in NTx. In the alfacalcidol group there was also a significant increase in P1CP and osteocalcin, in contrast to the alendronate group, but BMD in the alfacalcidol decreased versus an increase in the alendronate group (p < 0.001). In neither treatment group were changes in biochemical measures correlated with the change in BMD, with the exception of a negative correlation in the alendronate group between changes in total hip BMD and NTx. Use of alendronate resulted in an increased PTH in 27 patients, but the increase in BMD of these patients was not statistically significantly different compared to patients taking alendronate with normal PTH levels. CONCLUSION: Changes in BMD were not associated with changes in bone measures, with the exception of NTx in the alendronate group. For the patient taking glucocorticoids in clinical practice, the value of serial assessment of bone markers is low; changes in markers are no substitute for changes in BMD. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00138983.


Asunto(s)
Alendronato/uso terapéutico , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Huesos/efectos de los fármacos , Calcio/metabolismo , Hidroxicolecalciferoles/uso terapéutico , Osteoporosis/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/sangre , Biomarcadores/orina , Remodelación Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Huesos/metabolismo , Colágeno Tipo I/orina , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Homeostasis/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteocalcina/sangre , Osteoporosis/inducido químicamente , Osteoporosis/metabolismo , Hormona Paratiroidea/sangre , Fragmentos de Péptidos/metabolismo , Péptidos/orina , Procolágeno/metabolismo
7.
N Engl J Med ; 355(7): 675-84, 2006 Aug 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16914703

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treatment with glucocorticoids is associated with bone loss starting soon after therapy is initiated and an increased risk of fracture. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-placebo, double-blind clinical trial of 18 months' duration among patients with a rheumatic disease who were starting glucocorticoids at a daily dose that was equivalent to at least 7.5 mg of prednisone. A total of 201 patients were assigned to receive either alendronate (10 mg) and a placebo capsule of alfacalcidol daily or alfacalcidol (1 microg) and a placebo tablet of alendronate daily. The primary outcome was the change in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in 18 months; the secondary outcome was the incidence of morphometric vertebral deformities. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients received alendronate, and 101 received alfacalcidol; 163 patients completed the study. The bone mineral density of the lumbar spine increased by 2.1 percent in the alendronate group (95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 3.1 percent) and decreased by 1.9 percent in the alfacalcidol group (95 percent confidence interval, -3.1 to -0.7 percent). At 18 months, the mean difference of change in bone mineral density between the two groups was 4.0 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 2.4 to 5.5 percent). Three patients in the alendronate group had a new vertebral deformity, as compared with eight patients in the alfacalcidol group (of whom three had symptomatic vertebral fractures) (hazard ratio, 0.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.1 to 1.4). CONCLUSIONS: During this 18-month trial in patients with rheumatic diseases, alendronate was more effective in the prevention of glucocorticoid-induced bone loss than was alfacalcidol. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00138983 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).


Asunto(s)
Alendronato/uso terapéutico , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Hidroxicolecalciferoles/uso terapéutico , Osteoporosis/inducido químicamente , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Densidad Ósea , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Columna Vertebral
8.
Ann N Y Acad Sci ; 966: 82-90, 2002 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12114262

RESUMEN

Recently, four prospective placebo-controlled studies have further evaluated the disease-modifying properties of glucocorticoids in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. These studies irrefutably show that the use of (low) doses of glucocorticoids leads to a significant retardation of the progression of erosions, especially in early rheumatoid arthritis. This effect on erosions seems more impressive and probably more persistent than the well-known relief during low-dose glucocorticoid therapy of symptoms, such as pain, stiffness, and joint scores. The management of the (side) effects of glucocorticoids on bone has clearly improved in the last years. These two developments lead to a further optimizing of glucocorticoid treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/tratamiento farmacológico , Huesos/efectos de los fármacos , Cartílago Articular/efectos de los fármacos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Corticoesteroides/farmacología , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios/farmacología , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/farmacología , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/metabolismo , Artritis Reumatoide/patología , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/metabolismo , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/patología , Resorción Ósea/inducido químicamente , Huesos/patología , Cartílago Articular/patología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados como Asunto , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/farmacología , Osteoblastos/efectos de los fármacos , Osteoclastos/efectos de los fármacos , Osteogénesis/efectos de los fármacos , Osteoporosis/inducido químicamente , Osteoporosis/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Esteroides , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA