Influence of antimicrobial peptides on the formation of nonlamellar lipid mesophases.

We have studied the influence of four antimicrobial peptides of different secondary and ternary structure--melittin (Mel), protegrin-1 (PG-1), peptidyl-glycylleucine-carboxyamide (PGLa), and gramicidin S (GS)--on the lamellar-to-nonlamellar transition of palmitoyloleoyl phosphatidylethanolamine (POPE) applying differential scanning calorimetry and small-angle X-ray diffraction. None of the peptides studied led to the formation of an inverted hexagonal phase observed for pure POPE at high temperatures. Instead either cubic or lamellar phases were stabilized to different degrees. GS was most effective in inducing a cubic phase, whereas Mel fully stabilized the lamellar phase. The behavior of POPE in the presence of PG-1 and PGLa was intermediate to GS and Mel. In addition to the known role of membrane elasticity we propose two mechanisms, which cause stabilization of the lamellar phase: electrostatic repulsion and lipid/peptide pore formation. Both mechanisms prevent transmembrane contact required to form either an inverted hexagonal phase or fusion pores, as precursors of the cubic phase.

Effects of non-ionic surfactants N-alkyl-N,N-dimethylamine-N-oxides on the structure of a phospholipid bilayer: small-angle X-ray diffraction study.

Effects of non-ionic surfactants N-alkyl-N,N-dimethylamine-N-oxides (C(n)NO, n is the number of alkyl carbons) on the structure of egg yolk phosphatidylcholine (EYPC) bilayers in the lamellar fluid phase was studied by small-angle X-ray diffraction as a function of H(2)O:EYPC and C(n)NO:EYPC molar ratios. The bilayer thickness d(L) and the lipid surface area at the bilayer-aqueous interface S(L) were calculated from the repeat period, d of the lamellar phase, based on the model that water and EYPC + CnNO molecules form separated layers and that their molecular volumes are additive. In the studied range of m=CnNO:EYPC molar ratios up to 1:1, d(L) and S(L) change linearly. The slopes Delta L = delta dL/ delta m and Delta S= delta S L / delta m are equal to -0.876 +/- 0.027 nm and 0.347 +/- 0.006 nm2 for C(6)NO, -1.025+/-0.060 nm and 0.433+/-0.025 nm(2) for C(8)NO, -0.836+/-0.046 nm and 0.405+/-0.018 nm(2) for C(10)NO, -0.604+/-0.015 nm and 0.375+/-0.007 nm(2) for C(12)NO, -0.279+/-0.031 nm and 0.318+/-0.005 nm(2) for C(14)NO, -0.0865+/-0.070 nm and 0.2963 +/-0.014 nm(2) for C(16)NO, and -0.040+/-0.022 nm and 0.297+/- 0.002 nm(2) for C(18)NO, respectively, at full bilayer hydration. The peak-peak distance in the bilayer electron density profile, which relates to the P-P distance d(PP), obtained from the first four diffraction peaks by the Fourier transform also depends linearly on m, and the slope Delta PP = delta dPP/delta m is -0.528+/-0.065 nm for C(6)NO, -0.680+/-0.018 nm for C(8)NO, -0.573+/-0.021 nm for C(10)NO, -0.369+/-0.075 nm for C(12)NO, -0.190+/-0.015 for C(14)NO, -0.088+/-0.016 nm for C(16)NO and -0.094+/-0.016 nm for C(18)NO. The effects of C(n)NO on Delta(L), Delta(S) and Delta(PP) are the results of C(n)NO insertion into EYPC bilayers and depend on the hydrophobic mismatch between C(n)NO and EYPC hydrocarbon chains and on the lateral interactions of C(n)NO and EYPC in the bilayer.