RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To report the indications, frequency, and outcomes regarding intraocular lens (IOL) exchange in 2 university hospital tertiary referral settings over a period of 15 years. SETTING: Ophthalmology departments of the University Hospital Antwerp and the University Hospital Leuven, Belgium. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. METHODS: In this retrospective study, included were patients who underwent an IOL exchange between 2002 and 2017. Patient demographics, surgical indication, comorbidities, visual outcomes, and complications were reported. Patients who underwent IOL repositioning or add-on IOL implantation or extraction, and patients who were left aphakic, were excluded. RESULTS: Included in the study were 492 eyes. The mean age was 66.0 ± 13.3 years (range 19-91 years). The mean time between primary surgery and IOL exchange was 54.61 ± 67.07 months (range 0-343 months). Primary indication for explantation was IOL opacification, and the most common ophthalmic comorbidity was a previous history of vitreoretinal surgery. Preoperatively, the mean uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were 0.47 ± 0.27 (range 0-1) and 0.61 ± 0.32 (range 0-1.2), respectively. Postoperative UCVA and CDVA was 0.7 ± 0.3 (range 0-1.2) and 0.8 ± 0.28 (range 0.05-1.6), respectively. The increase in both CDVA and UCVA was statistically significant (P < .001, paired t test). The most common complication perioperatively was vitreous prolapse, which occurred in 61 eyes (16%). CONCLUSIONS: IOL exchange is a challenging yet valuable treatment option for a wide spectrum of problematic IOL outcomes. The most common indication remains IOL opacification, although IOL dislocation and patient dissatisfaction are increasing as indications.
Asunto(s)
Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares , Lentes Intraoculares , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Up to 66% of patients show local pulmonary disease progression after pulmonary metastasectomy. Regional treatment with isolated lung perfusion (ILuP) may improve local control with minimal systemic adverse effects. The aims of this study were to evaluate local and distant control after ILuP, determine the effect on overall survival compared with historical controls, and confirm the safety and feasibility of ILuP. METHODS: A total of 107 patients with resectable pulmonary metastases of colorectal carcinoma, osteosarcoma, and soft-tissue sarcoma were included in a prospective phase II study of pulmonary metastasectomy combined with ILuP with 45 mg melphalan at 37°C. Local and distant control, overall survival, lung function, and 90-day mortality and morbidity were monitored. RESULTS: We report 0% mortality, low morbidity, and no long-term pulmonary toxicity. For colorectal carcinoma, median time to local pulmonary progression, median time to progression, and median survival time were 31, 14, and 78 months, respectively. Median time to local progression was not reached for sarcoma, whereas median time to progression and median survival time were 13 and 39 months, respectively. The 5-year disease-free rate and pulmonary progression-free rate were 26% and 44% for colorectal carcinoma and 29% and 63% for sarcoma, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ILuP with melphalan combined with metastasectomy is feasible and safe. Compared with historical controls, favorable results were obtained in this phase II study for local control. Further evaluation of locoregional lung perfusion techniques with other chemotherapeutic drugs is warranted.