Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Acta cir. bras ; Acta cir. bras;35(3): e202000308, 2020. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1130622

RESUMEN

Abstract Purpose: The benefits of laparoscopic approaches to treat colorectal cancer (CRC) and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) separately are well established. However, there is no consensus about the optimal timing to approach the primary tumor and CRLM, whether simultaneously or staged. The objective of this review with practical reports is to discuss technical aspects required for patient selection to perform simultaneous laparoscopic approaches for CRC and CRLM. Methods: Literature review of oncological factors associated with patient selection for surgical treatment of CRLM and the use of laparoscopy in those cases, and report of technical aspects for simultaneous CRC and CRLM approaches. Results: Simultaneous laparoscopic resection has been successful in many series of selected patients, although it seems to be safer to perform minor and major liver resection with non-extended colorectal resections, and to avoid two high-risk procedures at the same time. Conclusions: Simultaneous CRC and CRLM resections seem to be safe when patients are carefully selected, also considering the risk of recurrence concerning oncologic outcomes. The pre-planning of simultaneous resection is mandatory to plan trocar positioning, procedure sequencing, and patient position.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Laparoscopía/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Selección de Paciente , Toma de Decisiones , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Estadificación de Neoplasias
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA