Progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation in oocyte donation: a model for elective fertility preservation?

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does type of LH peak suppression (progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation [PPOS] versus gonadotrophin releasing hormone [GnRH] antagonist) affect oocyte competence, embryo development and live birth rates in recipients of vitrified donated oocytes? DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study conducted between 2016 and 2018, involving 187 recipient cycles of donated vitrified oocytes. Oocyte donors were stimulated under LH suppression with desogestrel for PPOS (DSG group) or ganirelix GnRH antagonist (ANT group). Recipients younger than 50 years received vitrified oocytes from DSG donation cycles (DSG-R) or ANT donation cycles (ANT-R). RESULTS: A mean of 10.07 ± 3.54 oocytes per recipient were warmed (survival rate of 80.7%), and 5.90 ± 2.89 were fertilized (fertilization rate 72.6%). Out of 187 recipients, 168 achieved embryo transfers. No significant differences were found in warming survival rates, fertilization rates and embryo development between DSG-R and ANT-R groups. Ninety-four clinical pregnancies and 81 live births were achieved. No statistically significant differences were found in clinical pregnancy rates (47.7% versus 52.5, P = 0.513) and live birth rates (39.5% versus 46.5%, P = 0.336) per recipient cycle between DSG-R and ANT-R, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to assess the effect of treating oocyte donors. Live birth rate adjusted for associated factors was not statistically different between vitrified oocytes from DSG or ANT (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.47). CONCLUSION: Reproductive outcomes of recipients of vitrified oocytes are not affected by donor PPOS treatment. PPOS is suitable for suppressing LH peak in elective fertility preservation and in freeze-all strategies.

The effect of late-follicular phase progesterone elevation on embryo ploidy and cumulative live birth rates.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does late-follicular phase progesterone elevation have a deleterious effect on embryo euploidy, blastocyst formation rate and cumulative live birth rates (CLBR)? DESIGN: A multicentre retrospective cross-sectional study including infertile patients aged 18-40 years who underwent ovarian stimulation in a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) followed by a freeze-all strategy and euploid embryo transfer between August 2017 and December 2019. The sample was stratified according to the progesterone concentrations on the day of trigger: normal (≤1.50 ng/ml) and high (>1.50 ng/ml). Moreover, sensitivity analyses were performed to determine whether different conclusions would have been drawn if different cut-offs had been adopted. The primary outcome was the embryo euploidy rate. Secondary outcomes were the blastocyst formation rate, the number of euploid blastocysts and CLBR. RESULTS: Overall 1495 intracytoplasmic sperm injection PGT-A cycles were analysed. Late-follicular phase progesterone elevation was associated with significantly higher late-follicular oestradiol concentrations (2847.56 ± 1091.10 versus 2240.94 ± 996.37 pg/ml, P < 0.001) and significantly more oocytes retrieved (17.67 ± 8.86 versus 12.70 ± 7.00, P < 0.001). The number of euploid embryos was significantly higher in the progesterone elevation group (2.32 ± 1.74 versus 1.86 ± 1.42, P = 0.001), whereas the blastocyst formation rate (47.1% [43.7-50.5%] versus 51.0% [49.7-52.4%]), the embryo euploidy rate (48.3% [44.9-51.7%] versus 49.1% [47.7-50.6%], the live birth rate in the first frozen embryo transfer (34.1% versus 31.1%, P = 0.427) and CLBR (38.9% versus 37.0%, P = 0.637) were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Euploidy rate and CLBR do not significantly differ among PGT-A cycles with and without late-follicular progesterone elevation in a freeze-all approach.

COH outcomes in breast cancer patients for fertility preservation: a comparison with the expected response by age.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed during childbearing age, and fertility preservation is becoming increasingly more essential. However, recent studies indicate a possible poorer response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in cancer patients than in non-cancer controls and a negative impact of BRCA mutations on female fertility. This study aims to evaluate ovarian response and the number of mature oocytes (MII) vitrified in women with breast cancer, with or without BRCA mutation, comparing them to the expected response according to an age-related nomogram. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study involving sixty-one breast cancer patients who underwent COH for oocyte cryopreservation. The age-specific nomogram was built using 3871 patients who underwent COH due to oocyte donation, fertility preservation for non-medical reasons, or FIVET for male factor exclusively. RESULTS: The mean number of oocytes retrieved was 13.03, whereas the mean number of MII oocytes was 10.00. After the application of the z-score, no statistically significant differences were found compared with the expected response in the general population, neither by dividing patients according to the presence or absence of BRCA mutation nor according to the phase in which they initiated stimulation. CONCLUSION: The results obtained do not support the notion of a negative impact of the BRCA mutation on the ovarian response of women with breast cancer. Women with breast cancer undergoing COH for fertility preservation can expect the ovarian response predicted for their age.

What is the clinical impact of the endometrial receptivity array in PGT-A and oocyte donation cycles?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) test on the implantation rate (IR) and pregnancy rate (PR) in patients with previous failed euploid embryo transfers (Euploid-ET) or oocyte donation embryo transfers (Donor-ET). METHODS: Single-center retrospective study of patients with ≥ 1 previous failed Euploi-ET (n = 24) or ≥ 2 failed Donor-ET (n = 32) who underwent an ERA test and a post-ERA Euploid-ET/Donor-ET between 2012 and 2018. Controls were patients with ≥ 1 previously failed Euploid-ET (n = 119) or ≥ 2 failed Donor-ET (n = 158) who underwent Euploid-ET/Donor-ET during the same period without performing an ERA test. Only blastocyst stage embryos were included. IR/PR was compared between the post-ERA ET and the last ET in the control group. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference regarding IR [55.6% (34.6-76.5%) vs. 65.0% (56.9-73.1%)] nor PR (58.3% vs.70.6%, p = 0.238) in the Euploid-ET ERA vs. Euploid-ET control groups. In the Donor-ET arm, both IR [26.8% (12.3-41.4%) vs. 57.2% (50.1-64.3%)] and PR (34.4% vs. 65.2%, p = 0.001) were significantly lower in the ERA group. Multivariate analysis confirmed that performing an ERA test did not influence the PR in the Euploid-ET arm and was associated with a diminished PR in the Donor-ET arm. In the ERA group, 41.1% patients were non-receptive (NR). No significant difference was found regarding IR/PR in NR vs. receptive patients in both Euploid-ET/Donor-ET arms. CONCLUSIONS: In our sample, the performance of an ERA test did not improve pregnancy outcomes. Future prospective studies in larger samples are needed to confirm the role of the ERA test in Euploid-ET/Donor-ET.

Inconclusive results in preimplantation genetic testing: go for a second biopsy?

The transition in biopsy timing from blastomere to trophectoderm biopsy has led to a remarkable decrease in the percentage of undiagnosed blastocysts. However, patients with few or no euploid blastocysts can be affected by this residual percentage of diagnosis failure. The aim of this study is to assess whether blastocyst rebiopsy and revitrification is an efficient and safe procedure to be applied in cases of no results after analysis. Fifty-three patients agreed to the warming of 61 blastocysts to perform a second biopsy and PGT-A by aCGH. Only 75.4% of the blastocysts survived, reexpanded, and could be rebiopsied. After the second biopsy and analysis, 95.6% of the blastocysts were successfully diagnosed with an euploidy rate of 65.9%. Eighteen euploid blastocysts were warmed and transferred to 18 patients with a 100% survival and reexpansion rate. Seven clinical pregnancies have been achieved with 4 live births, 1 ongoing pregnancy, and 2 miscarriages. Thus, although few transfers of rebiopsied and revitrified blastocysts have been performed till date, our preliminary results show that this approach is efficient and safe to be applied for undiagnosed blastocysts, as it ultimately allows the transfer of euploid blastocysts and good clinical outcomes.

Cumulative live birth rates and number of oocytes retrieved in women of advanced age. A single centre analysis including 4500 women ≥38 years old.

STUDY QUESTION: Is there any relationship between the number of oocytes retrieved and cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) in women of advanced age? SUMMARY ANSWER: CLBRs increase with the number of oocytes retrieved in women of advanced reproductive age up to 41 years old, the added value is minimal in women more than 41 years and futile in women 44 years or older. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: CLBR is actually the most relevant outcome of IVF from patients' perspective. There are several studies that have analysed CLBR's but some of them have included several stimulation cycles, others have not included the frozen embryo transfers (FETs) in their analysis and none has focused on women of advanced reproductive age. We aimed to assess CLBR in women ≥38 years after a single stimulation cycle plus the subsequent frozen embryo transfers. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a retrospective analysis carried out in a University-affiliated tertiary centre between January 2000 and December 2013. Overall, 4570 infertile women aged ≥38 years who underwent their first cycle in our centre were included. PARTICIPANT/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients were categorized in four age-groups: 38-39 years (G1 = 1875 cycles), 40-41 years (G2 = 1380 cycles), 42-43 years (G3 = 833 cycles) and ≥44 years (G4 = 482 cycles). CLBR's were evaluated by adding the pregnancies and live births achieved in the FET's to the ones obtained in the fresh cycle. In order to find out the actual effect of the number of oocytes retrieved in these patients, a predictive model of CLBR according to age and oocyte yield was built. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: CLBRs significantly decrease with increasing age among women ≥38 years of age, with the most prominent and clinically relevant decline observed at 42-43 years old, and clear evidence for futility in women aged ≥44 years (25.9% at 38-39 years, 16.4% at 40-41 years, 7% at 42-43 years and 1.2% from 44 years onwards). The higher the number of oocytes retrieved, the higher the CLBR; however, this is more evident up to 41 years old and no clear benefit is observed from 44 years and beyond. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Limitations are related to the retrospective nature of the study; however, no significant differences were observed in the treatment protocols used. Other potential limitations could be the fact that embryo cryopreservation was carried out with slow freezing in 80% of cases and that a small proportion of patients still have frozen embryos; nevertheless, we do not expect a relevant impact of these issues as slow freezing showed excellent results that did not differ significantly compared to vitrification and, on the other hand, the extra benefit coming from the FETs was very limited. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The number of oocytes retrieved is significantly associated with CLBR also in women of advanced reproductive age. However, the added benefit appears to be restricted mainly in women up to 41 years old. Women over 43 do not experience any benefit in CLBR irrespective of the number of oocytes retrieved, and thus should be discouraged from doing an IVF cycle with their own oocytes; for the other age-groups, recommendations should be given considering the age and the expected ovarian response. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NA.

Linking back-to-back stimulation cycles with oral contraceptives or progestins in women undergoing embryo accumulation for preimplantation genetic testing, a retrospective study.

This retrospective study was carried out to determine which strategy is associated with improved outcomes in two back-to-back cycles when undergoing embryo accumulation. Eighty patients with two stimulation cycles performed with <45 days between retrievals between Jan'16-Mar'17 were included. Patients were segregated according to the strategy used to link stimulations: spontaneous menses (SM), vaginal micronized progesterone (VMP) or oral contraceptive pills (OCP). Main outcome measure was oocytes retrieved. The oocytes retrieved difference between cycles was -0.9 in SM, -1.5 in VMP and +0.4 in OCPs. Although not statistically significant, more oocytes retrieved were observed in the 2ndcycle when OCPs were used (9.0 ± 3.7 vs. 9.4 ± 4.1)? whereas fewer oocytes retrieved were observed when SM (9.4 ± 3.9 vs. 8.5 ± .0) or VMP (9.8 ± 5.7 vs. 8.2 ± 4.4) were used. After adjusting for age, gonadotropins and stimulation days (2nd cycle) and treatment group in an ANCOVA model, no treatment was associated with a higher average number of oocytes retrieved (power: 14.9%) or a higher difference of oocytes retrieved (power: 22.3%). Although no statistical significance was reached, OCPs were observed to achieve higher average and positive difference of oocytes retrieved in the 2nd cycle.

Transition from blastomere to trophectoderm biopsy: comparing two preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies strategies.

SummaryShortly after the implementation of comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) techniques for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A), the discussion about the transition from day 3 to blastocyst stage biopsy was initiated. Trophectoderm biopsy with CCS is meant to overcome the limitations of cleavage-stage biopsy and single-cell analysis. The aim of this study was to assess the results obtained in our PGT-A programme after the implementation of this new strategy. Comparisons between the results obtained in 179 PGT-A cycles with day 3 biopsy (D+3) and fresh embryo transfer, and 204 cycles with trophectoderm biopsy and deferred (frozen-thawed) embryo transfer were established. Fewer embryos were biopsied and a higher euploidy rate was observed in the trophectoderm biopsy group. No differences in implantation (50.3% vs. 61.4%) and clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (56.1% vs. 65.3%) were found. Although the mean number of euploid embryos per cycle did not differ between groups (1.5 ± 1.7 vs. 1.7 ± 1.8), the final number of euploid blastocysts available for transfer per cycle was significantly higher in the trophectoderm biopsy group (1.1 ± 1.3 vs. 1.7 ± 1.8). This factor led to an increased cumulative live birth rate in this last group (34.1% vs. 44.6%). Although both strategies can offer good results, trophectoderm biopsy offers a more robust diagnosis and the intervention is less harmful for the embryos so more euploid blastocysts are finally available for transfer and/or vitrification.

Preservación de la fertilidad: revisión y análisis de los tiempos oncológicos / Fertility preservation: a review and analysis of cancer treatment times

La incidencia del cáncer de mama (CM) ha aumentado progresivamente y aproximadamente el 15% de las mujeres son diagnosticados antes de los 45 años. Este subgrupo de pacientes suelen tener tumores más agresivos y serán tratadas con terapia sistémica (quimioterapia, terapia hormonal o ambos). Por otra parte, la tendencia a retrasar la edad de maternidad implica que una gran proporción de pacientes con CM jóvenes no han completado su deseo reproductivo. El impacto del tratamiento oncológico en la reserva ovárica depende de la edad de los pacientes, el tipo de esquema y la dosis recibida. El senólogo debería ser sensible al deseo gestacional y realizar una derivación inmediata a la Unidad de Preservación de la Fertilidad. Esta maniobra no implica un retraso en el inicio terapéutico de la enfermedad como demuestran nuestros resultados. En nuestro centro, 40 pacientes fueron sometidas a crioconservación de ovocitos entre 2010 y 2015. La media de días entre el diagnóstico de CM y el inicio del tratamiento oncológico fue de 37,6 días. El tiempo de estimulación (inicio del tratamiento de estimulación hasta la recuperación de los ovocitos) presentó una media de 12 días (7-21). Por lo tanto, consideramos que las pacientes jóvenes deben ser remitidas a una unidad de asesoramiento reproductivo, tal y como aconseja EUSOMA. La preservación de fertilidad requiere de la participación coordinada tanto del equipo de Oncología y el equipo de Reproducción Humana (AU)

The incidence of breast cancer (BC) has progressively increased, and approximately 15% of women will receive a diagnosis before the age of 45 years. This patient subgroup usually has more aggressive tumours and will be treated with systemic therapy (chemotherapy, hormone therapy, or both). In addition, the tendency to delay maternity implies that a many young patients with BC will not have fulfilled their reproductive wishes. The impact of cancer treatment on ovarian reserve depends on patient age, the type of regimen and the doses received. Senologists should be sensitive to their patients’ reproductive wishes and immediately refer them to Fertility Preservation Units. As shown by our results, referral does not imply a delay in treatment initiation. In our centre, 40 patients underwent ovarian tissue cryopreservation between 2010 and 2015. The mean number of days between BC diagnosis and the start of cancer treatment was 37.6 days. The mean time from stimulation (the start of stimulation until oocyte recovery) was 12 days (7-12). Therefore, we believe that young patients should be referred to a reproductive counselling unit, as recommended by EUSOMA. Fertility preservation requires liaison between the oncology and human reproduction teams (AU)

Should progesterone on the human chorionic gonadotropin day still be measured?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in our setting whether there is currently a level of P on the hCG day (P-hCG) predictive of no pregnancy. DESIGN: Observational study of prospectively collected data of the P-hCG levels of stimulated IVF cycles. SETTING: In vitro fertilization unit. PATIENT(S): All cycles of IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection with fresh embryo transfer performed between January 2009 and March 2014. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pregnancy rate. RESULT(S): Clinical pregnancy rate per ET was 38.7% and live birth rate was 29.1%. The P-hCG concentration was positively correlated to E2 on the hCG day, and the number of oocytes was negatively correlated to age. Progesterone on hCG day was higher among agonist- compared with antagonist-treated patients (mean ± SD: 1.13 ± 0.69 ng/mL vs. 0.97 ± 0.50 ng/mL) and among recombinant FSH compared with recombinant FSH + hMG stimulation (mean ± SD: 1.11 ± 0.58 ng/mL vs. 0.94 ± 0.50 ng/mL). Pregnancy rate was positively associated with the number of oocytes. There was no correlation between P-hCG value and pregnancy rate, overall or according to the type of treatment. CONCLUSION(S): In our setting there is no P-hCG value differentiating a good from a poor cycle success rate. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02323347.