High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation for Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in combination with chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone in treating patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). METHODS: The data of unresectable LAPC patients who received chemotherapy with or without HIFU ablation were retrieved retrospectively. The overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), cancer antigen 19-9 response rate, and safety were compared between these two groups before and after propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: Overall, 254 patients with LAPC were included, of whom 92 underwent HIFU ablation. After PSM to control for potential biases, HIFU was associated with improved OS (12.8 versus 12.2 months, log-rank P = .046), as compared to patients without HIFU ablation. Patients with numeric rating scale (NRS) less than 4, and receiving HIFU ablation were significantly associated with improved OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.365 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.148-0.655], P = .002; aHR = 0.490 [95% CI = 0.250-0.961], P = .038; respectively) by multivariate analyses with the adjustment of age, NRS, and tumor size. ORR was also observed to be higher in HIFU group of 30.0% than in the chemotherapy group of 13.3% (P = .039). No severe adverse events of special interest or HIFU-caused deaths were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with unresectable LAPC who received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy might benefit from additional HIFU ablation.

Safety and effectiveness of apatinib in elderly patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a sub-analysis from the large-scale, prospective observational study of apatinib for gastric cancer treatment in a real-world clinical setting (AHEAD-G202).

Background: Apatinib was shown to improve the survival of Chinese patients with refractory metastatic gastric cancer (mGC). As an orally administered drug, it has been widely used in elderly patients because the dosing schedule can be adjusted flexibly. However, data on the efficacy and safety of apatinib in elderly patients is scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and effectiveness of apatinib for elderly patients with mGC in a real-world setting. Methods: Data from the sub-population of patients who were ≥65 years enrolled in the AHEAD-G202 trial were analyzed. Patients with mGC were prospectively registered and initially received ≤850 mg oral apatinib daily combined or not combined with chemotherapy, at the investigator's discretion. The primary endpoint was safety. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 117 patients were included. There were 51 (43.59%) patients in the low-dose (250 mg) group, 60 (51.28%) patients in the mid-dose (425 to 500 mg) group, and 6 (5.13%) patients in the high-dose (850 mg) group according to the initial daily doses. Hypertension (6.84%) was the only grade 3-4 adverse event (AE) with a prevalence of more than 5% and across the low-dose (11.76%), mid-dose (3.33%) and high-dose group (0%). The median OS and PFS were 7.13 months (95% CI: 5.04 to 9.22 months) and 4.27 months (95% CI: 3.24 to 5.29 months), respectively. The OS and PFS were similar among the 65-74 and ≥75 years groups (χ2=1.406, P=0.306; χ2=0.378, P=0.066, respectively). The OS and PFS were also comparable among the 3 dose groups. Conclusions: Elderly patients with mGC can tolerate and benefit from apatinib therapy. A lower initial daily dosing strategy may be a suitable choice for elderly patients in clinical practice.

Safety and effectiveness of apatinib in patients with previously treated metastatic gastric cancer: a sub-analysis from the real-world study of apatinib for gastric cancer treatment (AHEAD-G202).

Apatinib, a VEGFR2 receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, showed survival benefits in Asian patients with heavily pretreated advanced gastric cancer. However, the adverse event (AEs) profile of apatinib has limited its use. Dosing schedules are used to alleviate toxicities despite no supportive evidence. This study aimed to analyze the toxicity and effectiveness of apatinib alone, especially with different dosing strategies in advanced gastric cancer patients under a real-world setting. Data from the subpopulation of patients who failed ≥2 chemotherapy regimens enrolled in the AHEAD-G202 trial were analyzed. The primary endpoint was safety. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Totally 120 patients were included into three groups by the initial daily doses: 43 (35.8%) patients in the low-dose (250 mg) group, 67 (55.8%) patients in the mid-dose (425 mg to 500 mg) group, and 10 (8.3%) patients in the high-dose (675 to 850 mg) group. Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent AEs were infrequent (<5%), with the most commonly reported grade 3/4 AEs being hand-foot syndrome (4.2%), hypertension (4.2%,), fatigue (4.2%), and difficulty in swallowing (4.2%) which gradually decreased among the high-, mid-, and low-dose groups. The median OS and PFS were 6.33 months (95% CI, 4.57-7.73) and 3.83 months (95% CI: 1.40-4.20), respectively and were comparable among the three doses groups. We found heavily pretreated advanced gastric cancer patients can tolerate and benefit from lower-doses of apatinib therapy. The lower initial daily dosing strategy represents an alternative approach for optimizing apatinib dosing in clinical practice.

An open label, multicenter, noninterventional study of apatinib in advanced gastric cancer patients (AHEAD-G202).

BACKGROUND: Apatinib has been proved to be effective and well tolerated among patients in phase II and III studies. Here, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of apatinib in advanced gastric cancer patients in a real-world setting. METHODS: This study enrolled advanced gastric cancer patients who had progressed or relapsed despite systemic chemotherapy. The primary outcome was safety and the secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: A total of 337 patients were included. In total, 62 (18.4%), 102 (30.3%), and 173 (51.3%) patients received first, second, and third or higher line apatinib therapy, respectively. Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were infrequent (<5%), with hypertension (6.8%) being the only grade 3/4 AE occurring in more than 5% of the patients and across the low-dose (250 mg, 7.3%), mid-dose (425-500 mg, 6.1%), and high-dose group (675-850 mg, 2/15, 13.3%). The median OS and PFS were 7.13 months (95% CI, 6.17-7.93) and 4.20 months (95% CI, 4.60-4.77), respectively, and were comparable among the low-, mid-, and high-dose groups. CONCLUSION: Lower daily doses of apatinib achieved comparable OS and PFS versus higher daily doses of apatinib while maintaining a more benign safety profile in advanced gastric cancer patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02668380.