Expression of MHC class I-related Chain B (MICB) molecules on renal transplant biopsies.

BACKGROUND: MICA and MICB (MHC class I-related chain A and B) are polymorphic genes that encode molecules related to MHC class I and are expressed on epithelial cells in response to stress. Incompatible donor MIC antigens can stimulate antibody production in transplant recipients. This study was designed to determine MICB expression in kidney pretransplant and any subsequent changes in expression following transplantation and to correlate changes with inflammatory markers and clinical events. METHODS: Paired renal biopsies obtained from living donor (n=10) and cadaveric allografts (n=50) before and 7 days posttransplant were stained for MICB, leukocytic infiltration, and HLA class II antigens. RESULTS: Variable tubular MICB expression was evident in donor biopsies [high 6/60 (10%), low/negative 13/60 (22%), intermediate 41/60 (68%)]. Following transplantation, MICB was up-regulated on renal tubules of 17/60 (28%) biopsies and was associated with MHC class II antigen induction (P=0.02) and leukocyte infiltration (P=0.01). Acute tubular necrosis leading to delayed graft function (DGF) and acute rejection (AR) cause cellular stress within the transplanted kidney. We found a strong association between up-regulation of MICB and cellular stress, 15/17 biopsies with up-regulated MICB expression had AR and/or DGF (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study demonstrating variable levels of MICB expression in kidneys before transplantation and induction of MICB expression following renal transplantation. MICB expression is associated with HLA class II antigen induction, leukocytic infiltration of the graft and cellular stress in the transplanted kidney. Expression of MICB could contribute significantly to the alloimmune response in mismatched donors and recipients.

Major effects of delayed graft function and cold ischaemia time on renal allograft survival.

BACKGROUND: There is mounting evidence from experimental and clinical studies that the quality of organs from cadaver donors may be influenced by events occurring around the time of brain death, and that these may affect transplant outcome. The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of donor factors on renal allograft outcome in a homogeneous cohort of 518 patients transplanted in a single centre over a 9 year period. METHODS: Endpoints of the study were delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection (AR), 1 year graft survival and long-term survival of those grafts that reached 1 year. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine factors that may have influenced the graft outcome indicators. RESULTS: DGF was the major predictor of graft failure overall with cold ischaemia time (CIT) as an important independent factor. The level of histocompatibility did not influence graft survival. DGF was the major factor affecting 1 year graft survival (P<0.0005) with effects persisting beyond 1 year. DGF was significantly influenced by CIT, donor age, female kidney into male recipient and donor creatinine (P<0.05). Other donor factors and factors associated with donor management were not risk factors for DGF, rejection episodes or graft survival. The risk factors for a number of AR episodes were HLA-DR mismatch and DGF (P<0.005). When grafts surviving for 1 year were considered, only CIT, recipient age and creatinine at 1 year (P<0.05) were found to affect graft survival significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this analysis of well-matched transplant recipients show that CIT and DGF are the most important predictors of poor short and long-term graft survival. Therefore, in order to improve the long-term survival of renal allografts efforts should focus on limiting CIT and the damage that occurs during this period and on improving our understanding of DGF.

C4d deposition in early renal allograft protocol biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Deposition of the complement protein C4d in renal allograft biopsies obtained during graft dysfunction and rejection has been proposed to be a sensitive marker of antibody-mediated acute rejection. To determine the diagnostic specificity of C4d deposition, it is important to study biopsies from allografts with no evidence of dysfunction. In this study, we examined C4d deposition in protocol biopsies obtained irrespective of clinical status. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry for C4d was performed on routine protocol biopsies preimplantation and on day 7 posttransplantation from 48 unselected renal allografts. Serum samples obtained up to 1 month after transplantation were assayed for donor-reactive antibodies (DRA). Results were correlated with histopathology and clinical outcome measures. RESULTS: Diffuse C4d deposition was detected in the peritubular capillaries of 6 of 48 (13%) biopsies. C4d deposition was present in 5 of 15 (33%) biopsies that showed acute rejection (Banff 97, category 4) but only in 1 of 33 (3%) biopsies with no rejection (P=0.003, 97% specificity). Posttransplant DRAs were detected in 21 of 48 (44%) patients. All five recipients with C4d deposition and rejection had posttransplant DRA; the recipient whose biopsy showed C4d positivity, but not rejection, did not have detectable DRA. C4d deposition was not treated with plasmapheresis or intravenous immunoglobulin and was not associated with poor posttransplant graft outcome at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that in early posttransplant protocol biopsies, C4d is a specific marker for the presence of humoral rejection, as indicated by its association with DRA and acute histologic rejection.

Leukocyte infiltration and inflammatory antigen expression in cadaveric and living-donor livers before transplant.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence to indicate that organs obtained from cadaveric donors may be injured as a result of inflammatory events occurring at around the time of brain death. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there are differences in the expression of proinflammatory molecules between cadaveric and living-donor livers before transplant and to determine whether there is any association with donor factors and posttransplant graft function. METHODS: A comparison of biopsies obtained before implantation from cadaveric (n=22) and living-related donor (LRD) (n=10) livers was performed. Cryostat tissue sections were stained with antibodies to leukocyte subpopulations, adhesion molecules, and human leukocyte antigen class II antigens. RESULTS: Significantly higher levels of CD3+ lymphocytes (1.5%+/-0.8% vs. 0.5%+/-0.3%; P=0.00004), CD68+ monocytes and macrophages (4.0%+/-1.2% vs. 2.7%+/-0.6%; P=0.0003), and Fas-ligand staining (4.2%+/-2.6% vs. 1.5%+/-1.1%; P=0.0003) were detected in cadaveric livers compared with LRD livers before transplantation. Furthermore, higher levels of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression were detected in cadaveric donor livers and found to be associated with longer periods of ventilation (P=0.01), infection in the donor (P=0.013), and administration of dopamine (P=0.03). Although there were no differences in neutrophil infiltration between cadaveric and LRD livers, significantly higher levels were found in cadaveric donors with infection (P=0.01). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that inflammatory changes occur in cadaveric donor livers and are associated with events occurring during the period of intensive care. These proinflammatory changes did not seem to affect the short-term clinical outcome of cadaveric liver allografts but may contribute to alloimmune responses and impairment of graft function in the long term.

Non-heart-beating versus cadaveric and living-donor livers: differences in inflammatory markers before transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation from non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) has been reintroduced into clinical practice to increase the donor pool; however, little is known about the immune status of NHBD livers. The aim of this study was to assess intragraft cell populations and inflammatory markers in NHBD and to compare the findings with cadaveric and living-related donor (LRD) livers. METHODS: Biopsy specimens were obtained from controlled NHBD (n=9), conventional cadaveric (n=22), and living-donor (n=10) livers at the end of cold storage. Cryostat sections were stained for monocytes-macrophages, T lymphocytes, and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1. RESULTS: The levels of leukocyte infiltration in NHBD reflected those found in conventional cadaver donors and were significantly higher than in LRD livers. Similar levels of CD68+ monocytes-macrophages were detected in cadaver (4.0+/-1.2%) and NHBD livers (4.6+/-1.2%) and were significantly greater than in the LRD livers (2.6+/-0.5%, P<0.01). Furthermore, the levels of T lymphocytes in NHBD (1.1+/-0.6%) and cadaver donors (1.5+/-0.8%) were similar, and were higher than in LRD (vs. 0.47+/-0.3%, P<0.05). Twelve of 22 (60%) cadaver livers had high levels of ICAM-1 expression (grade 3), compared with only 1 of 10 (10%) LRD livers (P=0.02). Four of nine (44%) controlled NHBD livers expressed high levels of ICAM-1. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that livers obtained from controlled NHBD before transplantation are similar to conventional cadaver donors regarding the level of leukocyte infiltration. Nevertheless, lower levels of ICAM-1 were detected in NHBD, suggesting less exposure to inflammatory mediators than conventional cadaver donor livers.

Cadaveric versus living-donor livers: differences in inflammatory markers after transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged cold storage of organs for transplantation may lead to inflammatory damage upon reperfusion. The aim of this study was to investigate whether organs from living donors experience less damage upon reperfusion than those retrieved from cadaver donors, where cold ischemia times are significantly longer. METHODS: Biopsies were obtained from cadaveric (n=23) and living-related donor (LRD) (n=10) liver transplants before and 2 hours after reperfusion. Cryosections were stained with antibodies against neutrophils, platelets, activated platelets, and endothelium. RESULTS: LRD liver allografts showed minimal changes postreperfusion. In contrast, after reperfusion of cadaver allografts, neutrophil infiltration was detected in 22% and increased expression of von Willebrand factor (vWF), CD41, and P-selectin in 48%, 30%, and 13% of allografts, respectively. In cadaver allografts with deposition of activated platelets expressing either P-selectin or vWF, the cold ischemia time was significantly longer (885 +/- 123 min vs. 608 +/- 214 min, P=0.04; 776.8 +/- 171 min vs. 559.3 +/- 216 min, P=0.01, respectively). Increases in neutrophils and platelets after reperfusion were not significantly associated with clinical events posttransplant. However, in cadaver transplants that experienced early acute rejection, the mean cold ischemia time was significantly longer than in allografts with no rejection (732 +/- 174 min vs. 480 +/- 221 min, P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that in the clinical situation, cold ischemia causes platelet deposition and neutrophil infiltration after reperfusion of cadaveric liver allografts. These early inflammatory events may contribute to make the graft more susceptible to acute rejection.

The role of mitochondria in ischemia/reperfusion injury.

In organ transplantation, ischemia/reperfusion injury is a multifactorial process that leads to organ damage and primary graft dysfunction. Injury to the organ is mediated by a complex chain of events that involves depletion of energy substrates, alteration of ionic homeostasis, production of reactive oxygen species, and cell death by apoptosis and necrosis. There is increasing evidence that mitochondria play a role in this process because of the profound changes experienced during ischemia and reperfusion. Understanding the mechanisms that lead to mitochondrial damage may be important for developing strategies aimed at improving graft outcome. In this review, we examine the role of mitochondria in ischemia/reperfusion injury and the possible mechanisms that may contribute to organ dysfunction.

Lecithinized superoxide dismutase reduces cold ischemia-induced chronic allograft dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Chronic renal allograft failure (CAF) is influenced by both allo-dependent and independent factors and is a major cause of graft loss in clinical renal transplantation. We evaluated a novel membrane-bound free radical scavenger, lecithinized superoxide dismutase (lec-SOD), to determine its potential in limiting the harmful effects of ischemia/reperfusion injury on CAF. METHODS: Fisher rat kidneys were stored for either 1 hour or 18 hours in cold Marshall's preservation solution either with or without lec-SOD and transplanted into Lewis recipients. RESULTS: Within 3 days of transplantation, an early inflammatory response involving granulocytes and macrophages was detected in renal allografts exposed to 18 hours cold ischemia that was significantly reduced by preservation with lec-SOD. By 24 weeks post-transplantation, elevated proteinuria and detection of apoptotic cells was observed in kidneys exposed to 18 hours of cold ischemia, that was attenuated by preservation with lec-SOD (P < 0.05). However, up-regulated expression of intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) Class II together with a T lymphocyte infiltration were observed at 24 weeks that was not prevented by preservation with lec-SOD. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that ischemia/reperfusion injury, apoptotic cell death and allo-immune responses may be exacerbated by cold ischemia and accelerate the development of CAF. Preservation with lec-SOD may protect against the early damage induced by cold ischemia and reperfusion injury.