RESUMEN
OBJECT: Research on readmissions has been influenced by efforts to reduce hospital cost and avoid penalties stipulated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Less emphasis has been placed on understanding these readmissions and their impact on patient outcomes. This study 1) delineates reasons for readmission, 2) explores factors associated with readmissions, and 3) describes their impact on the survival of glioblastoma patients. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of 362 cases involving patients with glioblastoma undergoing biopsy or tumor resection at their institution between 2003 and 2011. Reasons for re-hospitalization were characterized according to whether or not they were related to surgery and considered preventable. Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the effect of readmission on survival and determine factors associated with re-hospitalizations. RESULTS: Twenty-seven (7.5%) of 362 patients experienced unplanned readmissions within 30 days of surgery. Six patients (22.2%) were readmitted by Day 7, 14 (51.9%) by Day 14, and 20 (74.1%) by Day 21. Neurological, infectious, and thromboembolic complications were leading reasons for readmission, accounting for, respectively, 37.0%, 29.6%, and 22.2% of unplanned readmissions. Twenty-one (77.8%) of the 27 readmissions were related to surgery and 19 (70.4%) were preventable. The adjusted hazard ratio of mortality associated with a readmission was 2.03 (95% CI 1.3-3.1). Higher-functioning patients (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.9-1.0) and patients discharged home (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.1-0.6) were less likely to get readmitted. CONCLUSIONS: An overwhelming fraction of documented unplanned readmissions were considered preventable and related to surgery. Patients who were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of surgery had twice the risk of mortality compared with patients who were not readmitted.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Meningiomas are more prevalent in women and mostly benign in nature. Our aim was to evaluate the association of weight and outcomes of meningioma patients undergoing craniotomy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of meningioma patients discharged postcraniotomy between 1998 and 2007 was conducted. Univariate and multivariate analysis evaluated in-hospital mortality, complications, length of stay (LOS), and cost. RESULTS: According to the nationwide inpatient sample (NIS) database, an estimated 72,257 adult meningioma patients underwent a craniotomy in US hospitals during the study period. Female and male weight loss rates were 0.7% and 1.2%, respectively; obesity rates were 5.2% and 3.7%. Males had higher rates of malignant tumors than females (6.2% vs. 3.5%, P < 0.0001), and malignant tumors were more common in patients with weight loss (6.4% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.03). Weight loss was associated with higher mortality in men (OR 6.66, P < 0.0001) and women (OR 3.92, P = 0.04) as well as higher rates of postoperative complications in both men (OR 6.13, P < 0.0001) and women (OR 8.37, P < 0.0001). Furthermore, patients suffering weight loss had longer LOS and higher overall hospital cost when compared with all patients. In contrast, obesity seemed to reduce mortality (OR 0.47, P = 0.0006) and complications (OR 0.8, P = 0.0007) among women. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, weight loss seems to be the single most critical factor present in patients experiencing higher mortality, complications, hospital charges, and longer LOS. However, further studies aimed to assess the inter-relation of potential preexisting comorbidities and weight loss are needed to establish causation.
RESUMEN
Three groups of 18 children were selected for this study, one group with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), one group with developmental delays in which ASD was ruled out (DD), and one group with typical development (TD), from a pool of 3026 children who were screened with the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile (CSBS DP, Wetherby & Prizant. 2002) Infant-Toddler Checklist under 24 months of age. The CSBS DP Behavior Sample was videotaped on selected children as a second-level evaluation during the second year of life. The Infant-Toddler Checklist had a sensitivity and specificity of 88.9% for this sample of children. Significant group differences were found on the Infant-Toddler Checklist and the Behavior Sample, however, these differences did not distinguish children with ASD and DD with high accuracy. The videotapes of the Behavior Sample were reanalyzed to identify red flags of ASD. Nine red flags differentiated children in the ASD group from both the DD and TD groups and four red flags differentiated children in the ASD Group from the TD group but not the DD group. These 13 red flags were found to discriminate the three groups with a correct classification rate of 94.4%.