Complex ADHD Challenging Case: Managing Co-Occurring Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Congenital Heart Disease with a Limited Medication Formulary: A Case from Mexico.

CASE: DL is an 8-year-old Mexican boy with a posterior atrial septal defect and partial anomalous pulmonary venous return of the right lower pulmonary vein with resultant right heart dilation with normal right ventricular systolic and diastolic function and no arrhythmias. Surgical repair was deferred, and DL's condition was being medically managed with furosemide 0.5 mg/kg BID and spironolactone 0.5 mg/kg BID.DL presents for developmental assessment due to poor performance in school following a lifting of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions and return to in-person classes. He has been attending full-time classes for 3 months without improvements in math, reading, and writing skills. Current attentional concerns at school include an inability to complete tasks without getting distracted by minimal stimuli and highly impulsive behavior.At the first assessment, DL was performing below grade expectations (e.g., reading by syllable without text comprehension, demonstrating preoperational addition and subtraction skills, inability to take dictation)-all of which was viewed as negatively impacted by attentional deficits. DL met DSM-5 criteria for ADHD, predominantly inattentive type. He was started on 10-mg immediate-release methylphenidate PO at 8 am with breakfast and a second dose of 10-mg immediate-release methylphenidate PO 4 hours after the first dose.After a month, at the first follow-up consultation, improvement in attention span, impulsivity, and school performance were observed, including reading skills and math proficiency. However, DL's mother raised concerns about circumoral cyanosis and acrocyanosis in the fingers of both hands after playing outside. These signs were not previously observed. During physical examination at the same visit, heart rate, blood pressure, and oximetry were within baseline ranges and his cardiac examination was unchanged. DL's dosage of methylphenidate was lowered to 10-mg immediate-release methylphenidate PO QD in the mornings with breakfast (8 am).DL did not return to clinic for another 2 months, having discontinued the medication after 2 months of treatment given financial limitations. His mother reported that DL's exertional circumoral cyanosis and acrocyanosis resolved while he was off medication. However, she observed an increase in inattentive symptoms and impulsivity and decline in his academic skills. She asked if our team was able continue the treatment despite the drug side effects, since she believed the benefits outweighed the disadvantages.Given these concerns, the team requested an updated cardiology assessment. The Cardiologist recommended discontinuation of methylphenidate and recommended follow-up with cardiothoracic surgery for reassessment of the surgical timeline.Given the limited treatment options in Mexico, what would you do next as the treating developmental-behavioral clinician…?

Co-occurring Epilepsy and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in a 6-Year-Old Boy.

CASE: "Andrew" is a 6-year-old, right-handed, cisgender boy who presents for neuropsychological testing to determine whether he meets criteria for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Andrew's parents report that he is easily distracted, has poor concentration, and is unable to sustain attention for discrete periods of time. Andrew is the product of an uncomplicated pregnancy and delivery, and there were no reported concerns in the postnatal period. Andrew met all of his language and motor milestones on time. He was described as having an "easy" temperament in his infancy and toddler years. Difficulties with attention started in preschool in that Andrew was described as frequently "getting lost" in his play or the task he was working on. He was easy to redirect and responded to cues and reminders. Socially, Andrew was described as friendly but not always "picking up on social cues." Andrew's kindergarten teachers first noted that sometimes Andrew would "blank out" and appear to stare off, which was attributed to inattention. His teachers brought their concerns to Andrew's parents, and his parents began to observe Andrew more carefully and noted that these episodes also occurred at home daily. When queried, his parents reported that these episodes would last 4 to 5 seconds and Andrew would not respond to his name being called or to being physically touched. Andrew's medical history, and that of his immediate and extended family, is unremarkable. Routine hearing and vision screenings are also unremarkable. There are no reports of head injuries or concussions. Andrew's gait is stable, and there are no signs of motor weakness. There are no reports of sensory seeking or avoiding behaviors. There are no reports of witnessing or experiencing trauma; motor or vocal tics; or compulsions, ritualized behaviors, or restricted interests.Testing revealed high average verbal comprehension skills, average perceptual and fluid reasoning, and lower end of average working memory and processing speed. During testing, the examiner noted a rapid eye flutter, which Andrew did not see to recognize himself but did ask the examiner to repeat the previous question. Parent and teacher rating scales of emotional and behavioral functioning showed elevations in the areas of inattention and adaptability and 1 scale of executive functioning noted elevations in task monitoring but no other difficulties. Socially, Andrew is well liked by his peers, although he can present as "silly." He has many same-aged friends and enjoys group activities. His parents have been hesitant to get him involved in sports because he has been known to have these staring episodes right after competing in sporting events. He also tends to have them more often during the school week when he has less sleep, which his parents attribute to having a difficult time falling asleep at night. What would you do next?

Complex ADHD Challenging Case: When Simple Becomes Complex: Managing Clinician Bias and Navigating Challenging Family Dynamics in a 6-Year-Old Girl with ADHD and Developmental Delays.

CASE: Layla is a 6.7-year-old girl diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-predominantly hyperactive/impulsive type-delayed adaptive skills, enuresis, unspecified malnutrition, and feeding difficulties. She presented to developmental-behavioral pediatrics (DBP) in January 2022 due to caregiver concerns for autism spectrum disorder (ASD).Layla lives in a polyamorous family with her biological mother and father, mother's partner whom Layla refers to as her uncle, and her 2 half-siblings. There is a maternal history of special education services, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, multiple sclerosis, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, and ADHD. Layla's father is a veteran diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder. Layla's siblings, aged 5 and 9 years, have established diagnoses of ADHD, ASD, global developmental delays, behavioral concerns, and poor sleep. There is a history of adverse childhood experiences, including parental mental health, poverty, and involvement with child protective services. Acknowledgement and inclusion of all members of this diverse family structure, as well as consistent validation from the DBP and social worker, allowed a strong treatment alliance to form and the mother continued to contact the DBP clinic, even for those questions related to other specialties. A social worker received weekly calls from the mother sharing grievances related to feeling misunderstood and spoke about the assumptions she felt external providers made about her family, culture, and parenting styles. For example, she recalls the pediatrician commenting about their family structure being "confusing for the children" and describing their home as "chaotic," assumptions that may not have been made of nuclear family structures. Behavioral therapies were a repeated recommendation, but the mother verbalized not being interested in these options as she had participated in parent management training several years earlier and felt that the strategies taught were not applicable to her unique family structure, to which the clinician replied, "this is the standard recommendation for all children this age with disruptive behaviors." Although the mother was initially hesitant to trial medications, she eventually agreed that Layla's symptoms were negatively affecting her school performance, and the DBP initiated a stimulant medication.Layla's initial evaluation included a developmental history, behavioral observations, and standardized testing. The results from developmental testing demonstrated age equivalents between 4 and 6 years across gross motor, adaptive, visual motor, and speech-language domains.On observation, Layla was extremely active. During the visit, she walked over to her mother, made eye contact, and showed her the picture that she had drawn. She engaged in imaginary play, reciprocal conversation, and responded to social bids. The mother felt strongly that Layla had ASD and reported symptoms such as motor stereotypies (hand flapping), covering ears with certain noises/sounds, and rigidity when it came to things being a certain way or a certain color. These behaviors did not occur in the initial or subsequent clinic visits with DBP, her general pediatrician, or during other outside evaluations the mother pursued. The DBP felt strongly that Layla was mimicking her siblings' symptoms and provided ongoing education regarding ADHD symptomology.In terms of behavior management, the mother did not attempt to redirect Layla's behaviors during the initial clinic visit and in subsequent visits, and both adult men yelled loudly, clapped, and hit their hands on the table as a form of redirection. The mother continued to voice her diagnostic disagreement with the DBP and the pediatrician and insisted that Layla met the criteria for ASD. When the mother reviewed the report, a statement insinuating that Layla's behaviors were "understandable given parental inconsistency and complicated family structure" upset her.What factors would you consider when thinking about caregiver disagreement with the diagnosis and treatment plan? Does diagnostic overshadowing apply here?

Society for Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics Clinical Practice Guideline for the Assessment and Treatment of Children and Adolescents with Complex Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common childhood neurodevelopmental disorder and is associated with an array of coexisting conditions that complicate diagnostic assessment and treatment. ADHD and its coexisting conditions may impact function across multiple settings (home, school, peers, community), placing the affected child or adolescent at risk for adverse health and psychosocial outcomes in adulthood. Current practice guidelines focus on the treatment of ADHD in the primary care setting. The Society for Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics has developed this practice guideline to facilitate integrated, interprofessional assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with "complex ADHD" defined by age (<4 years or presentation at age >12 years), presence of coexisting conditions, moderate to severe functional impairment, diagnostic uncertainty, or inadequate response to treatment.

Injury Prevention Education in the Waiting Room of an Underserved Pediatric Primary Care Clinic.

Unintentional injuries are the leading cause of childhood mortality in the United States. Study aims included educating families about injury prevention and improving satisfaction with the waiting room experience. Two hundred caregivers with young children in the waiting room of an underserved pediatric primary care clinic participated in brief individual education sessions and received a toolkit containing small safety items and content highlighting age-appropriate safety topics. Participants completed 2 follow-up surveys, and most caregivers (94%) reported learning new information about injury prevention and thought that the intervention resulted in a better waiting room experience (91%). Of those who completed the 2-week follow-up survey (84%), 93.5% made changes at home and 42.7% bought new safety equipment. Injury prevention education can be effectively provided in the waiting room of a pediatric primary care clinic by improving reported caregiver safety knowledge and behaviors as well as satisfaction with the waiting room experience.

Perceived Mentoring Practices in Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics Fellowship Programs.

OBJECTIVE: Junior physicians describe mentoring relationships as integral to their career development and success. Current evidence suggests that mentoring is under-utilized despite interest from trainees. The purpose of this study is to describe the mentoring practices in developmental-behavioral pediatric (DBP) fellowship programs and identify mentoring needs of DBP fellows and recent graduates. METHODS: DBP fellows and recent graduates less than 5 years out of training from US-based DBP fellowship programs were contacted to complete a survey on their mentoring experiences in fellowship and early career. RESULTS: A total of 90 respondents completed the entire survey including 47 current DBP fellows and 43 recent graduates. Only 52% of respondents reported having a formal faculty mentor during their fellowship. Only 45% of recent graduates reported that they currently have a mentor, of those without a current mentor 83% said they would like to have a mentor. Adequate mentoring during fellowship was lowest for career development and research (34% and 27%). Satisfaction with mentoring was associated with having a formal mentor (p < .001) and receiving mentoring in multiple areas (p < .001). Qualitative responses suggested that effective mentoring addresses the mentee's career goals, provides insight into being a developmental-behavioral pediatrician, assists in navigating academics, and involves a personal relationship. CONCLUSION: Results suggest opportunities for improved mentoring in DBP fellowship programs, particularly in the areas of career development and research and that there is a significant need for mentorship among recent graduates. Findings from this study can inform program improvement in mentoring for DBP fellows and recent graduates.