Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Lett Appl Microbiol ; 63(3): 189-95, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27367648

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: The aims were to assess the performance of Vitek 2 in identifying enterococcal species and the implementation of GeneXpert(®) vanA/vanB PCR for the detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Gram-positive cocci from clinical and environmental specimens (n = 431) suspicious of being enterococci by conventional methods were evaluated by Vitek 2. This system identified 296 Enterococcus faecium, 87 Enterococcus faecalis, 10 Enterococcus villorum, 9 Enterococcus gallinarum, 9 Enterococcus durans, 5 Enterococcus casseliflavus, 1 Enterococcus spp. and 14 isolates as Non-Enterococcus. All strains were submitted to pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis showing 64 banding patterns. Representative strains from each banding pattern were further characterized to species level by 16S rDNA sequencing. The misidentification rate by Vitek 2 to species level among 429 molecularly identified enterococci was 6% (26 isolates). Additionally, 372 rectal swabs were obtained from critically ill patients. They were evaluated for the presence of VRE by ChromID VRE combined with in-house PCR vs GeneXpert(®) . GeneXpert(®) showed high (>92%) sensitivity, specificity, accuracy for vanA-positive Enterococcus detection, as well as, sensitivity and specificity for vanB-positive strains. Positive predictive value for detection of vanB-positive enterococci by GeneXpert(®) vanA/vanB was low (30%). GeneXpert(®) showed the same efficacy as ChromID VRE in detecting vanA-positive enterococci, but lower for vanB-gene detection. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The study shows that even though the performance of Vitek 2 Advanced Expert System was good in identifying enterococci to species level, it is important to verify results by a molecular method when phenotypic findings are discordant with epidemiologic patterns. Furthermore, GeneXpert(®) vanA/vanB PCR and ChromID VRE combined with in-house PCR were applied in rectal samples for the detection of VRE colonization among critically ill patients. GeneXpert(®) showed an excellent performance in detecting vanA-positive enterococci, but false-positive results for vanB-gene detection render its application problematic in departments with high incidence of vanB-positive enterococci.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Ligasas de Carbono-Oxígeno/genética , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/diagnóstico , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/genética , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/aislamiento & purificación , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Humanos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/clasificación
2.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 34(10): 1947-55, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26173689

RESUMEN

Our goal was to identify the risk factors for co-colonization by KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) upon intensive care unit (ICU) admission and during stay. Rectal and nasal samples were taken from each patient upon admission at two Greek ICUs and each week afterwards, and were inoculated onto chromogenic agar. Representative colonies were characterized with standard methods and Vitek-2 technology. The presence of the bla KPC gene (K. pneumoniae isolates), vanA and vanB (Enterococcus faecium and E. faecalis isolates), and mecA (S. aureus isolates) was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Upon ICU admission, among 481 patients, 59 (12%), 63 (13%), and 20 (4%) were colonized by KPC-Kp, VRE, or MRSA, respectively. Simultaneous colonization by KPC-Kp and VRE upon admission (34 patients) was associated with the number of co-morbidities [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.5; confidence interval (CI) 1.0-2.5], administered antibiotics (aOR: 1.7; CI 1.3-2.3), and prior KPC-Kp infection (aOR: 24.4; CI 1.5-396.0). Among patients with an ICU stay of more than 6 days, 181 (73%), 31 (13%), and 9 (4%) became KPC-Kp, VRE, or MRSA colonized during ICU stay, respectively. KPC-Kp colonization was an independent risk factor for VRE colonization upon admission (aOR: 2.7; CI 1.0-7.2) and during stay (aOR: 7.4; CI 2.0-27.4), whereas VRE colonization was a risk factor for KPC-Kp upon admission (aOR: 5.1; CI 1.9-13.9) and MRSA colonization upon admission (aOR: 3.5; CI 1.2-10.1) and during ICU stay (aOR: 14.5; CI 2.1-100.1). Colonization by a multidrug pathogen could promote colonization by another.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Klebsiella/tratamiento farmacológico , Klebsiella pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Resistencia a la Vancomicina/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Anciano , Infección Hospitalaria , Enterococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Grecia , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
3.
Infection ; 42(6): 1013-22, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25143193

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci (VRE) are important causes of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) infections. Our goal was to identify the prevalence and risk factors for VRE colonization upon ICU admission and during ICU stay, as well as, their impact in enterococcal infection including vancomycin-susceptible cases (VSE). METHODS: A prospective study regarding patients admitted in ICU (n = 497) was conducted during a 24-month period. Rectal swabs were collected upon admission and during hospitalization and inoculated onto selective medium. Enterococci were phenotypically characterized. van genes were investigated by PCR and clones were identified by Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and Multilocus Sequence Typing. Epidemiologic data were collected from the ICU database. RESULTS: Risk factors for VRE carriage upon ICU admission (71/497) were: duration of previous hospitalization, glycopeptide administration, chronic heart failure, malignancy, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and previous enterococcal infection (VRE and/or VSE). Risk factors for VRE colonization during ICU stay (36/250) were: quinolone administration, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic renal failure, and number of VRE-positive patients in nearby beds. Risk factors for enterococcal infection during ICU stay (15/284), including VRE and VSE cases, were: administration of third- or fourth-generation cephalosporins, cortisone use before ICU admission and VRE colonization, whereas, enteral nutrition was a protective factor. CONCLUSIONS: Previous VRE colonization and antibiotic usage are essential parameters for enterococcal infection (by VRE or VSE) during ICU stay. Previous enterococcal infection, co-morbidities and antibiotic usage are associated with VRE colonization upon ICU admission, whereas, patient to patient transmission, co-morbidities and antibiotic usage constitute risk factors for VRE colonization during ICU hospitalization.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/patogenicidad , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crítica , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Microbiología Ambiental , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/aislamiento & purificación
4.
New Microbiol ; 27(2): 187-9, 2004 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15164631

RESUMEN

Tetanus is still a common problem in countries with poor health conditions. On the contrary, where there is a systematic program of vaccination in children it is very rare. The aim of this study was to check the immunity level of a representative sample of rural people from villages of Achaia County in Southern Greece. Samples were taken from 140 locals during a six-month period (January till July 2002). In each sample, we estimated IgG antibodies against Clostridium tetani toxin. A protection level of 0.1 IU/ml was set. 15.7% of the people had sufficient immunization cover while a statistically significant superiority of immunized men was found. The results of this study revealed low immunity percentage of the examined inhabitants and a vaccination program against the disease has been proposed to the local health authorities.


Asunto(s)
Clostridium tetani/inmunología , Tétanos/inmunología , Tétanos/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Femenino , Grecia , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Población Rural , Toxoide Tetánico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...