RESUMEN
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are safe and efficacious treatments for advanced primary liver cancer (PLC). The efficacy of different ICIs in the treatment of liver cancer remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to explore whether there is a difference in the efficacy and safety of various programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors in combination with lenvatinib in the treatment of unresectable PLC. Patients with PLC treated with lenvatinib in combination with PD-1 inhibitors (camrelizumab, tislelizumab, sintilimab, or pembrolizumab) between January 2018 and December 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. Tumor response, adverse events, and grades were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to compare the overall survival and progression-free survival of patients treated with different PD-1 inhibitors. Cox regression analysis was used for univariate and multivariate analyses to identify clinical variables related to treatment efficacy. This study included a total of 176 patients who received a combination of lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors. Of these, 103 patients received camrelizumab, 44 received tislelizumab, 20 received sintilimab, and 9 received pembrolizumab. There was no significant difference in the pairwise comparison of camrelizumab, tislelizumab, sintilimab, and pembrolizumab using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Adverse events occurred in 40 (22.7%) patients (grade ≥ 3, 2.3%). The incidence of grade 3 adverse events among the four PD-1 inhibitor groups was below 5%. Camrelizumab, tislelizumab, sintilimab, and pembrolizumab are viable options for patients with unresectable PLC. These PD-1 inhibitors in combination with lenvatinib showed good safety profiles. The results guide selecting treatment for patients with unresectable PLC.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved survival outcomes and resulted in long-term responses in primary liver cancer in some patients. Nevertheless, not all patients with PLC could benefit from immunotherapy. Therefore, it is necessary to identify patients suitable for such therapy. METHODS: 215 patients with primary liver cancer with immunotherapy from Nanfang Hospital were screened between August 2018 and October 2020 as a training set and our validation set included 71 patients of hepatocellular carcinoma from Jiangxi Cancer Hospital from May 2019 to July 2021. The primary endpoint was the disease control rate (DCR), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival. RESULTS: In the training set, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥3 and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level ≥20 ng/mL were independently associated with non-DCR in the training set after adjusting for distant metastasis at baseline and targeted therapy combination. Furthermore, a hepatic immune predictive index (HIPI) based on NLR and AFP level was developed and patients with poor HIPI associated with worse clinical outcomes. In validation set, high HIPI was associated with poor OS. CONCLUSION: HIPI, based on NLR and AFP level, is an effective indicator in ICI-treated patients with primary liver cancer. Our findings may help guide the selection and on-treatment strategies for immunotherapies for primary liver cancer patients.