Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 31
Filtrar
1.
Ann Intern Med ; 165(5): 379, 2016 09 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27595224
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25664204

RESUMEN

Vitamin deficiencies such as scurvy and Wernicke's encephalopathy are poorly recognized in Western populations. Inadequate intake of these micronutrients and low levels when measured are more frequent than expected. Cases of combined vitamin deficiencies such as that of ascorbic acid and thiamine are seldom reported. Two patients with clinical and biochemical evidence of vitamin deficiencies are described. Signs and symptoms rapidly responded to vitamin replacement. Neither patient was overtly malnourished, but nutritional histories and physical examination were strongly suggestive. Vitamin replacement may require large intravenous doses but is inexpensive and potentially of great benefit.

3.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 51(10): 3591-8, 2007 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17682105

RESUMEN

Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) is an emerging pathogen that primarily manifests as uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections. We conducted a cluster randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine whether targeted intranasal mupirocin therapy in CA-MRSA-colonized soldiers could prevent infection in the treated individual and prevent new colonization and infection within their study groups. We screened 3,447 soldiers comprising 14 training classes for CA-MRSA colonization from January to December 2005. Each training class was randomized to either the mupirocin or placebo study group, and the participants identified as CA-MRSA colonized were treated with either mupirocin or placebo. All participants underwent repeat screening after 8 to 10 weeks and were monitored for 16 weeks for development of infection. Of 3,447 participants screened, 134 (3.9%) were initially colonized with CA-MRSA. Five of 65 (7.7%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 4.0% to 11.4%) placebo-treated participants and 7 of 66 (10.6%; 95% CI, 7.9% to 13.3%) mupirocin-treated participants developed infections; the difference in the infection rate of the placebo- and mupirocin-treated groups was -2.9% (95% CI, -7.5% to 1.7%). Of those not initially colonized with CA-MRSA, 63 of 1,459 (4.3%; 95% CI, 2.7% to 5.9%) of the placebo group and 56 of 1,607 (3.5%; 95% CI, 2.6% to 5.2%) of the mupirocin group developed infections; the difference in the infection rate of the placebo and mupirocin groups was 0.8% (95% CI, -1.0% to 2.7%). Of 3,447 participants, 3,066 (89%) were available for the second sampling and completed follow-up. New CA-MRSA colonization occurred in 24 of 1,459 (1.6%; 95% CI, 0.05% to 2.8%) of the placebo group participants and 23 of 1,607 (1.4%; 95% CI, 0.05% to 2.3%) of the mupirocin group participants; the difference in the infection rate of the placebo and mupirocin groups was 0.2% (95% CI, -1.3% to 1.7%). Despite CA-MRSA eradication in colonized participants, this study showed no decrease in infections in either the mupirocin-treated individuals or within their study group. Furthermore, CA-MRSA eradication did not prevent new colonization within the study group.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Mupirocina/administración & dosificación , Mupirocina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Administración Intranasal , Adulto , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Medios de Cultivo , Método Doble Ciego , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Personal Militar , Mupirocina/efectos adversos , Manejo de Especímenes , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología
4.
Mil Med ; 171(9): 821-5, 2006 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17036598

RESUMEN

The predominant bacteria and antimicrobial susceptibilities were surveyed from a deployed, military, tertiary care facility in Baghdad, Iraq, serving U.S. troops, coalition forces, and Iraqis, from August 2003 through July 2004. We included cultures of blood, wounds, sputum, and urine, for a total of 908 cultures; 176 of these were obtained from U.S. troops. The bacteria most commonly isolated from U.S. troops were coagulase-negative staphylococci, accounting for 34% of isolates, Staphylococcus aureus (26%), and streptococcal species (11%). The 732 cultures obtained from the predominantly Iraqi population were Klebsiella pneumoniae (13%), Acinetobacter baumannii (11%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10%); coagulase-negative staphylococci represented 21% of these isolates. These differences in prevalence were all statistically significant, when compared in chi2 analyses (p < 0.05). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing demonstrated broad resistance among the Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria.


Asunto(s)
Acinetobacter baumannii/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/patología , Hospitales Militares , Klebsiella pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Medicina Militar , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Acinetobacter baumannii/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Recolección de Datos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Humanos , Irak , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Personal Militar , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Estados Unidos , Guerra
5.
Mil Med ; 171(9): 826-9, 2006 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17036599

RESUMEN

Bacterial contamination of war wounds occurs either at the time of injury or during the course of therapy. Characterization of the bacteria recovered at the time of initial trauma could influence the selection of empiric antimicrobial agents used to prevent infection. In the spring of 2004, U.S. military casualties who presented to the 31st Combat Support Hospital in Baghdad, Iraq, with acute traumatic injuries resulting in open wounds underwent aerobic culture of their wounds to identify the bacteria colonizing the wounds. Forty-nine casualties with 61 separate wounds were evaluated. Wounds were located predominantly in the upper and lower extremities and were primarily from improvised explosive devices or mortars. Thirty wounds (49%) had bacteria recovered on culture, with 40 bacteria identified. Eighteen casualties (20 wounds) had undergone field medical therapy (irrigation and/or antimicrobial treatment); six of these had nine bacterial isolates on culture. Of the 41 wounds from 31 patients who had received no previous therapy, 24 grew 31 bacteria. Gram-positive bacteria (93%), mostly skin-commensal bacteria, were the predominant organisms identified. Only three Gram-negative bacteria were detected, none of which were characterized as broadly resistant to antimicrobial agents. The only resistant bacteria recovered were two isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Our assessment of war wound bacterioly soon after injury reveals a predominance of Gram-positive organisms of low virulence and pathogenicity. The presence of MRSA in wounds likely reflects the increasing incidence of community-acquired MRSA bacteria. These data suggest that the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics with efficacy against more resistant, Gram-negative bacteria, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., is unnecessary in early wound management.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Medicina Militar , Heridas y Lesiones/microbiología , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Bacterias Gramnegativas/patogenicidad , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/patología , Bacterias Grampositivas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Grampositivas/aislamiento & purificación , Bacterias Grampositivas/patogenicidad , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/patología , Hospitales Militares , Humanos , Irak , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Personal Militar , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , Guerra , Heridas y Lesiones/patología
6.
Mil Med ; 171(6): 504-7, 2006 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16808130

RESUMEN

Community-acquired, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (cMRSA), soft tissue infections are becoming increasingly prevalent in the outpatient setting. Few studies have been specifically designed to examine the efficacy of oral antibiotic therapy for these infections. We performed an observational study to determine the effect of alternative, orally administered antibiotics on cMRSA soft tissue infections. Consecutive patients between January 2001 and March 2004 who had skin or soft tissue infections from which cMRSA was isolated and who had never received vancomycin were studied through retrospective and concurrent review. Primary outcome measures were improvement or resolution of infection 5 and 14 days after initiation of treatment with orally administered antibiotics and rates of recurrence within 30 days after completion of treatment. Thirty subjects met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-one subjects received either clindamycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, doxycycline/minocycline, or a fluoroquinolone. Five subjects received a beta-lactam antibiotic with abscess drainage, and four subjects underwent abscess drainage alone. Improvement was noted for all subjects at 5 days, complete resolution of infection occurred for all subjects by 14 to 17 days, and in no case did relapse occur within 30 days. cMRSA skin and soft tissue infections can be successfully treated with orally administered antibiotics to which the organism has demonstrable in vitro susceptibility.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Clindamicina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Doxiciclina/uso terapéutico , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/microbiología , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/microbiología
7.
Clin J Sport Med ; 16(1): 34-8, 2006 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16377973

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Transmission of bacterial and viral pathogens is known to occur by hand contact with fomites. Exercise equipment in public facilities may serve as such fomites. It is not known whether equipment disinfection might reduce microorganism colonization. We performed studies to address these issues. DESIGN: Observational study of bacterial and viral culture results from hand-contact surfaces of exercise equipment, pre-exercise and postexercise; prospective study of viral culture results before and after intervention with disinfection solution. SETTING: Two fitness centers in a military community. INTERVENTION: One week trial of twice-a-day equipment disinfection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Type and number of bacteria and type of viruses present on equipment before and after exercise; prevalence of viral culture positivity on equipment before and after intervention. RESULTS: Bacterial cultures of body contact surfaces on equipment revealed benign bacterial species (coagulase-negative staphylococci, diphtheroids, and so forth) but no pathogenic bacteria whether obtained pre-exercise or postexercise, or whether from aerobic versus weight training equipment. Viral cultures revealed the presence of viruses (generally rhinoviruses) on 63 of 100 (63%) hand-contact surfaces of equipment. Weight equipment was significantly more often contaminated than aerobic equipment (73% vs. 51%; P = 0.026). Disinfection of equipment did not lower the prevalence of virus isolation (48% positive before cleaning; 86% positive after cleaning). CONCLUSIONS: There is little risk of exposure to pathogenic bacteria on exercise equipment. Such equipment may commonly serve as fomites for the transmission of viruses. These data do not suggest that disinfection of exercise equipment will offer significant protective effects against virus exposure.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Contaminación de Equipos , Centros de Acondicionamiento , Virus/aislamiento & purificación , Desinfección/métodos , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Ejercicio Físico , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos
8.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 7(6): 555-65, 2006 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17233574

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The appearance of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) in the absence of culturable bacterial pathogens is a common dilemma for the surgeon. METHODS: The literature was searched through references to primary articles, as well as a MEDLINE review, for reports of culture-negative SSIs. RESULTS: Potential causes of culture-negative SSIs include prior antimicrobial therapy; the presence of fastidious or slow-growing microorganisms such as mycobacteria, Mycoplasma spp., and Legionella spp.; infection caused by mundane bacteria that may be dismissed as "contaminants"; factitious infection; and others. CONCLUSIONS: We review the recognized causes of "culture negative" SSIs and discuss the laboratory capabilities that may enhance recognition of many of these pathogens and management options.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias Gramnegativas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Bacterias Grampositivas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología , Medios de Cultivo , Bacterias Gramnegativas/clasificación , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Bacterias Grampositivas/clasificación , Bacterias Grampositivas/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología
9.
Mil Med ; 171(12): 1167-71, 2006 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17256675

RESUMEN

We determined the ability of blinded remote expert microscopy to identify malaria parasites through transmission of malaria smear images via telemedicine and as e-mail attachments. Protocols for malaria smear transmission included: (1) transmission of sender-selected televised smears at various bandwidths (Bw), (2) transmission of remote reader-directed televised smears at various Bw, and (3) transmission of digital photomicrographs as e-mail attachments. Twenty (14%) of 147 sender-selected, and 13 (6%) of 221 reader-directed, images were deemed unreadable by slide readers. The presence or absence of malaria was correctly identified in 98% of the remaining images. Sixty-four (34%) of 190 digital microphotographs were deemed unreadable, while the presence or absence of malaria was correctly identified in 100% of the remaining images. Correct speciation ranged from 45% to 83% across various transmission methods and Bw. The use of telemedicine and e-mail technology shows promise for the remote diagnosis of malaria.


Asunto(s)
Correo Electrónico , Malaria/patología , Microscopía/métodos , Medicina Militar/métodos , Consulta Remota , Animales , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador , Malaria/parasitología , Personal Militar , Plasmodium falciparum/aislamiento & purificación , Plasmodium vivax/aislamiento & purificación , Especificidad de la Especie , Texas , Estados Unidos
10.
J Travel Med ; 12(6): 332-7, 2005.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16343385

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Even among travelers who undergo evaluation in travel medicine clinics, illnesses develop despite the emphasis placed on prevention. It is possible that travel-associated disease rates may be modified by maximizing access to care and augmenting educational methods of disease prevention. Use of alternative preventive measures such as alcohol hand gel sanitizers may also alter illnesses among travelers. METHODS: We assessed medical outcomes in a travel population cared for in the setting of free vaccinations, medications, and travel medicine consultation, in which personal preventive measures were presented in numerous formats by a physician specializing in infectious diseases. An initial demographic questionnaire was administered at the time of travel consultation. A post-travel telephone interview conducted 2 weeks after return from travel evaluated illness while abroad, illness upon return, and adherence to travel recommendations. An assessment was also performed regarding the utility of an alcohol hand gel sanitizer. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-five travelers were evaluated (primarily older, well-educated US-born travelers, on vacation with family or coworkers). Travelers filled their prescriptions 98% of the time; 77% reported adherence to antimalarial chemoprophylaxis. Sixty-four percent of travelers developed illness abroad, and 20% developed illness upon return. The most frequent complaints were diarrhea and upper respiratory illness. Ten percent of travelers altered their itinerary owing to illness. The use of alcohol hand gel sanitizers did not appear to impact the development of diarrhea or respiratory illnesses. CONCLUSION: In this small group of travelers, access to free consultation, vaccinations, and medications along with presentation of personal protective measures in various formats did not seem to influence the development of illnesses among travelers. Although not rigorously analyzed, alcohol hand gel sanitizers did not seem to alter diarrhea or respiratory tract illness rates. These data highlight the need for new or more effective methods to prevent illness among travelers.


Asunto(s)
Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/organización & administración , Educación en Salud/organización & administración , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/organización & administración , Prevención Primaria/organización & administración , Viaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Diarrea/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Enfermedades de la Piel/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
12.
Mil Med ; 170(4 Suppl): 71-6, 2005 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15916286

RESUMEN

Epidemic jaundice, although known by armies since ancient times, became a concern of the U.S. military only after outbreaks occurred during World War II. Early work by military investigators defined, for the first time, the existence of two different forms of hepatitis. Subsequently, investigators described the effective prevention of symptomatic hepatitis using immune serum globulin. Military researchers contributed to the isolation of and testing for the virus of infectious hepatitis, work that was then instrumental in the designing and fielding of a hepatitis A vaccine. Hepatitis B contributions included the elaboration of community-based epidemiology and description of the efficacy of immune serum globulin prophylaxis. Most recently, studies on hepatitis E defined the epidemiology, performed genomic sequencing, and developed a DNA vaccine currently being tested against the disease. Major research contributions to the understanding of and protection against viral hepatitis have been made by the military medical establishment over the past 60 years.


Asunto(s)
Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/historia , Hepatitis Viral Humana/historia , Medicina Militar/historia , Investigación Biomédica/historia , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Historia del Siglo XVIII , Historia del Siglo XIX , Historia del Siglo XX , Humanos , Estados Unidos
13.
Mil Med ; 169(11): 863-5, 2004 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15605930

RESUMEN

Camp Bullis, Texas, is an active training facility for the U.S. Army and Air Force with a storied history dating back to the late 19th century. In the early 1940s, an epidemic of a seasonal tick-borne rickettsial-like illness occurred at Camp Bullis; the last case was reported in 1947. To date, the etiology of this disease has remained elusive. In an attempt to retrospectively identify the causal pathogen, we surveyed Camp Bullis for the presumed tick vector with intent to screen molecularly for Rickettsia and Ehrlichia. However, no ticks were recovered from primary dragging attempts in the spring or from harvested deer in the fall. Moreover, pathologic and microbiologic materials obtained during the epidemic are no longer extant, making them unavailable for analysis. In this study, we review potential circumstances that impact emerging and, in this case, vanishing infections. The etiology of Bullis fever will probably remain undetermined, and this once-emerging infection may have vanished into history. However, given Camp Bullis' status as an active medical training site, awareness of and surveillance for the disease should continue.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Militar/historia , Infecciones por Rickettsia/historia , Rickettsia/aislamiento & purificación , Animales , Vectores Arácnidos , Brotes de Enfermedades , Historia del Siglo XX , Humanos , Personal Militar , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones por Rickettsia/etiología , Texas , Garrapatas/microbiología , Estados Unidos
14.
Obstet Gynecol ; 104(5 Pt 2): 1177-9, 2004 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15516443

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dissemination of coccidioidomycosis to the abdominal cavity is rare. No previous case of peritoneal coccidioidomycosis has presented as an adnexal mass. CASE: We report a case of peritoneal coccidioidomycosis mimicking ovarian carcinoma. The patient presented with a complex ovarian mass, ascites, omental caking, and an elevated CA 125. The ultimate diagnosis was not made until frozen section histopathology was performed at staging laparotomy. CONCLUSION: Peritoneal coccidioidomycosis can present with the clinical, radiographic, and serologic features of ovarian cancer. Although essential for diagnosis and staging, radiographic studies and tumor markers have limited specificity. Coccidioidomycosis now joins other benign conditions that comprise the differential diagnosis of patients who present with what seems to be advanced ovarian carcinoma. Infectious diseases consultation is recommended for the management of peritoneal coccidioidomycosis.


Asunto(s)
Coccidioidomicosis/diagnóstico , Fungemia/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Peritoneales/diagnóstico , Adulto , Biopsia con Aguja , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía/métodos , Inmunohistoquímica , Laparotomía/métodos , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Ovariectomía/métodos , Enfermedades Peritoneales/microbiología , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Clin Infect Dis ; 39(7): 971-9, 2004 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15472848

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) is an emerging pathogen for which the prevalence, risk factors, and natural history are incompletely understood. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we evaluated 812 US Army soldiers to determine the prevalence of and risk factors for CA-MRSA colonization and the changes in colonization rate over time, as well as to determine the clinical significance of CA-MRSA colonization. Demographic data and swab samples from the nares for S. aureus cultures were obtained from participants at the start of their training and 8-10 weeks later. Over this time period, participants were observed prospectively to monitor for soft-tissue infections. S. aureus isolates were characterized by in vitro examination of antibiotic susceptibilities, mecA confirmation, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) gene testing. RESULTS: At the initial sampling, 24 of the participants (3%) were colonized with CA-MRSA, 9 of whom (38%) developed soft-tissue infections during the study period. In contrast, 229 participants (28%) were colonized with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), 8 (3%) of whom developed clinical infections during the same period (relative risk, 10.7; 95% confidence interval, 4.6-25.2; P<.001). At follow-up culture, the CA-MRSA colonization rate dropped to 1.6% without eradication efforts. Previous antibiotic use was a risk factor for CA-MRSA colonization at the initial sampling (P=.03). PVL genes were detected in 66% of 45 recovered CA-MRSA isolates, including all 9 clinical isolates available for analysis. Of subjects hospitalized, 5 of 6 had PVL-positive CA-MRSA infections. CONCLUSIONS: CA-MRSA colonization with PVL-positive strains was associated with a significant risk of soft-tissue infection, suggesting that CA-MRSA may be more virulent than MSSA. Previous antibiotic use may play a role in CA-MRSA colonization.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Personal Militar , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Absceso/microbiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Portador Sano , Celulitis (Flemón)/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Nariz/microbiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Staphylococcus aureus/patogenicidad , Factores de Virulencia/genética
16.
Am J Infect Control ; 32(6): 333-6, 2004 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15454889

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many hospital systems in the United States are contemplating the implementation of a smallpox vaccination program. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other organizations recommend use of occlusive dressings over the vaccination site of health care workers in contact with patients. Minimal data are available on the impact of an occlusive dressing on the evolution of the vaccinia inoculation site. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study in which subjects were instructed to cover their vaccination site with either a semipermeable dressing over gauze or gauze alone. We recorded the duration of semipermeable dressing use and parameters pertaining to vaccination site evolution, to include time until scab separation. RESULTS: The increased use of a semipermeable dressing is associated with increased time until scab separation (n = 41, r =.48, P =.001 by regression analysis). This analysis predicts a 9-day difference in time until scab separation between patients that wore semipermeable dressings 100% of the time versus not at all. No significant correlation was observed between semipermeable dressing use and size of maximum erythema, time until maximum erythema, size of erythema on day 6 or 8, nor time until pustule formation. CONCLUSION: Semipermeable dressing use appears to prolong the time until scab separation and possibly the duration of infectivity and risk of secondary transmission. Health care organizations may wish to consider this information when instituting a smallpox vaccination program.


Asunto(s)
Vendajes , Vacuna contra Viruela/administración & dosificación , Viruela/prevención & control , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Permeabilidad , Probabilidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Muestreo , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Vacunación/métodos
17.
Arch Intern Med ; 164(15): 1669-74, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15302637

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cellulitis is a condition routinely encountered in the primary care setting. No previous study has compared a short (5 days) vs standard (10 days) course of therapy of the same antibiotic in patients with uncomplicated cellulitis. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine if 5 days of therapy has equal efficacy to 10 days of therapy for patients with cellulitis. Of 121 enrolled subjects evaluated after 5 days of therapy for cellulitis, 43 were randomized to receive 5 more days of levofloxacin therapy (10 days total antibiotic treatment), and 44 subjects to receive 5 more days of placebo therapy (5 days of total antibiotic treatment). Levofloxacin was given at a dose of 500 mg/d. Subjects were not randomized if they had worsening cellulitis, a persistent nidus of infection, a lack of any clinical improvement, or abscess formation within the first 5 days of therapy. The main outcome measure was resolution of cellulitis at 14 days, with absence of relapse by 28 days, after study enrollment. RESULTS: Eighty-seven subjects were randomized and analyzed by intention to treat. There was no significant difference in clinical outcome between the 2 courses of therapy (success in 42 [98%] of 43 subjects receiving 10 days of antibiotic, and 43 [98%] of 44 subjects receiving 5 days of antibiotic) at both 14 and 28 days of therapy. CONCLUSION: In patients with uncomplicated cellulitis, 5 days of therapy with levofloxacin appears to be as effective as 10 days of therapy.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Celulitis (Flemón)/tratamiento farmacológico , Levofloxacino , Ofloxacino/administración & dosificación , Análisis de Varianza , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadísticas no Paramétricas
18.
Am J Infect Control ; 32(5): 262-7, 2004 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15292889

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The influence of hospital design on nosocomial transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is unknown. Our hospital's relocation to a new building with radically different ward design allowed us to study this question. Our old hospital facility had open bay wards and intensive care units, and few poorly located sinks for handwashing (bed:sink ratio 4:1). Our new hospital facility had optimized hand-washing geography and distribution of ward beds into mostly single or double rooms (bed:sink ratio 1.3:1). METHODS: We compared the prevalence of MRSA in the 2 institutions by obtaining nasal swabs from all patients on 8 selected wards and intensive care units at 2 time points both before and after the move. In addition, passive surveillance rates of MRSA for all hospitalized patients for 2 years both before and after the move were compared. Hand hygiene practices, although unrelated to the study periods, were directly observed. RESULTS: Eight of 123 patients cultured before the move were MRSA positive, compared to 5 of 138 patients cultured after the move (P=NS). MRSA prevalence determined by passive surveillance of all hospitalized patients before and after the move was also unchanged. An insignificant increase in the frequency of hand-hygiene performance following the move (20% to 23%) was observed. CONCLUSION: Radical facility design changes, which would be permissive of optimal infection control practices, were not sufficient, by themselves, to reduce the nosocomial spread of MRSA in our institution.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Arquitectura y Construcción de Hospitales , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/transmisión , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Análisis de Varianza , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Texas/epidemiología
19.
Mil Med ; 169(6): 417-20, 2004 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15281668

RESUMEN

Pertussis, once a serious respiratory disease in children, has recently been identified as a common cause of chronic cough in adults. Military personnel are known to be vulnerable to this disease. After a training barracks exposure to pertussis, routine arrangements for contact prophylaxis with erythromycin failed. This experience is reported here as well as that of our subsequent aggressive attempts using directly observed prophylaxis (DOP) with standard erythromycin regimens. No secondary cases occurred. However, many contacts (35%) could not finish a 14-day course despite DOP, mostly because of nausea (85%) or diarrhea (72%). Seventeen (18%) soldiers missed classes because of erythromycin side effects; five required emergency department visits or hospital admission for the same. Sixteen (17%) soldiers were switched to azithromycin because of side effects; all were able to complete a 14-day course without symptoms. High adherence rates with erythromycin administration using DOP are attainable but may trigger unacceptable toxicities; alternative prophylactic regimens should be considered for active duty personnel.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica , Terapia por Observación Directa , Eritromicina/uso terapéutico , Tos Ferina/prevención & control , Adulto , Eritromicina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Personal Militar , Exposición Profesional , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...