The relationship between pre- and postprostatectomy measures of pelvic floor muscle function and development of early incontinence after surgery.

AIMS: The aim of this study is to investigate (i) whether pelvic floor muscle (PFM) shortening can be enhanced by provision of training focused on striated urethral sphincter (SUS) with feedback before prostatectomy, (ii) whether PFM shortening during voluntary efforts and coughing before and after prostatectomy differs between men who do and do not report symptoms of urinary incontinence 1 month after prostatectomy, and (iii) the relationship between severity of incontinence after prostatectomy and features of pelvic floor function (muscle shortening) and urethral length before and after prostatectomy. METHODS: Sixty men referred for preoperative PFM training before radical prostatectomy participated. The International Continence Society Male Short Form questionnaire was used to quantify continence status. Transperineal ultrasound (US) imaging was used to record pelvic displacements related to activation of striated urethral sphincter, bulbocavernosus (BC) and puborectalis muscles during cough, "natural" voluntary contraction following pamphlet instruction, and trained voluntary contraction after formal physiotherapist instruction including US feedback. RESULTS: Pelvic floor displacements following training differed between continent and incontinent men; continent participants demonstrated increased SUS shortening after training (compared with "natural"), but no difference was observed between trained and "natural" contractions for incontinent participants. Motion at ano-rectal junction during cough was reduced following surgery, but voluntary and involuntary activation of SUS or BC was not consistently affected by surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Participants' capacity to improve function of the SUS with training appears related to postprostatectomy continence outcome.

Reconsideration of pelvic floor muscle training to prevent and treat incontinence after radical prostatectomy.

Urinary incontinence is common after radical prostatectomy. Pelvic floor muscle training provides a plausible solution. Although early trials provided promising results, systematic reviews have questioned the efficacy of this intervention. A major consideration is that most clinical trials in men have applied principles developed for pelvic floor muscle training for stress urinary incontinence in women, despite differences in anatomy between sexes and differences in the mechanisms for continence/incontinence. Literature regarding continence control in men has been conflicting and often based on erroneous anatomy. New understanding of continence mechanisms in men, including the complex contribution of multiple layers of striated pelvic floor muscles, and detailed consideration of the impact of radical prostatectomy on continence anatomy and physiology, have provided foundations for a new approach to pelvic floor muscle training to prevent and treat incontinence after prostatectomy. An approach to training can be designed to target the pathophysiology of incontinence. This approach relies on principles of motor learning and exercise physiology, in a manner that is tailored to the individual patient. The aims of this review are to consider new understanding of continence control in men, the mechanisms for incontinence after radical prostatectomy, and to review the characteristics of a pelvic floor muscle training program designed to specifically target recovery of continence after prostatectomy.

Ultrasound-based motor control training for the pelvic floor pre- and post-prostatectomy: Scoring reliability and skill acquisition.

AIM: This study documents a protocol designed to evaluate pelvic floor motor control in men with prostate cancer. It also aims to evaluate the reliability of therapists in rating motor control of pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) using real time ultrasound imaging (RUSI) video clips. We further determine predictors of acquiring motor control. METHODS: Ninety-one men diagnosed with prostate cancer attending a physiotherapy clinic for pelvic floor exercises were taught detailed pelvic floor motor control exercises by a physiotherapist using trans-abdominal RUSI for biofeedback. A new protocol to rate motor control skill acquisition was developed. Three independent physiotherapists assessed motor control skill attainment by viewing RUSI videos of the contractions. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify predictors of successful skill attainment. Acquisition of the skill was compared between pre- and post-operative participants using an independent-group t-test. RESULTS: There was good reliability for rating the RUSI video clips (ICC 0.73 (95%CI 0.59-0.82)) for experienced therapists. Having low BMI and being seen pre-operatively predicted motor skill attainment, accounting for 46.3% of the variance. Significantly more patients trained pre-operatively acquired the skill of pelvic floor control compared with patients initially seen post-operatively (OR 11.87, 95%CI 1.4 to 99.5, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: A new protocol to evaluate attainment of pelvic floor control in men with prostate cancer can be assessed reliably from RUSI images, and is most effectively delivered pre-operatively.