Emergent simple discrimination established by indirect relation to differential consequences.

Three experiments examined a discrimination training sequence that led to emergent simple discrimination in human subjects. The experiments differed primarily in their subject populations. Normally capable adults served in the first experiment, preschool children in the second, and mentally retarded adults in the third. In all experiments, subjects learned a simple simultaneous discrimination: When visual stimuli A1 and A2 were displayed together, reinforcers followed selections of A1, the S+, but not A2, the S-. The subjects also learned a conditional discrimination taught with an arbitrary visual-visual matching-to-sample procedure. Comparisons were two additional visual stimuli, B1 and B2, and samples were A1 and A2. Reinforcers followed selections of B1 in the presence of A1 and of B2 in the presence of A2. After the simple-discrimination and conditional-discrimination baselines had been acquired, B1 and B2 were displayed alone (without a sample) on probe trials. Subjects had never been taught explicitly how to respond to such displays. Nonetheless, they almost always selected B1, which was involved in a conditional relation with A1, the stimulus that served as S+ on the simple-discrimination trials. This outcome suggested the formation of stimulus classes during conditional-discrimination training. Through class formation, B1 and B2 had apparently acquired stimulus functions similar to those shown by A1 and A2 on simple-discrimination trials, thereby leading to emergent selections of B1 on the probes.

Stimulus class formation and functional equivalence in moderately retarded individuals' conditional discrimination.

Three mentally retarded humans first acquired a simple discrimination: Simultaneously displayed visual stimuli A1 and A2 functioned as S+ and S-, respectively. The subjects also acquired a conditional discrimination, learning to select visual stimuli B1 and B2 conditionally upon A1 and A2, respectively. Then, B1 and B2 were displayed without A1 or A2. Subjects selected B1, an emergent discrimination that showed that B1 and B2 had become functionally equivalent to A1 and A2, respectively. Two subjects next learned to select C1 and C2 conditionally upon B1 and B2, respectively. They also learned to select B1 and B2 conditionally upon D1 and D2, respectively. Subsequent simple discrimination probe trials displayed (a) C1 and C2 and (b) D1 and D2. On the former, the subjects nearly always selected C1. On the latter, they initially selected D1 and D2 about equally often. Thus, the emergence of simple discrimination appears to depend on a specific experimental history.