Asunto(s)
Diafragma/lesiones , Hernia Diafragmática Traumática/etiología , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Accidentes de Tránsito , Anciano , Errores Diagnósticos , Femenino , Humanos , Rotura , Toracostomía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Considerable accrued evidence points to an association between testicular microlithiasis, intratubular germ cell neoplasia, and testicular tumor. This study assesses both the prevalence of testicular microlithiasis revealed on sonography in a referred population and the concurrent tumor risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 32-month period (April 1996 through November 1998), 4892 scrotal sonographic examinations were performed in 4819 patients at four referral centers. All patients underwent high-resolution (7- to 10-MHz) imaging. Using a computerized word search (n = 4102; testicular microlithiasis, calcification, microliths, calcific foci, tumor, neoplasm, cancer, hyperecho, hypoecho, heterogen, and carcinoma) and manual retrieval (n = 790), cases of tumor, testicular microlithiasis (>5 microliths per sonogram), and testicular microlithiasis plus tumor were pulled and retrospectively reviewed. The presence and type of tumor were confirmed at histology after orchidectomy. RESULTS: Fifty-four tumors were found among 4892 scrotal sonograms (28 seminomas, 14 teratomas, 8 mixed germ cell tumors, 2 Leydig cell tumors, and 2 non-Hodgkin's lymphomas). Testicular microlithiasis was present in 33 patients, giving a prevalence of 0.68%. Concurrent tumor and testicular microlithiasis were detected in seven patients, a relative risk of tumor in testicular microlithiasis was 21.6-fold (95% confidence limits: 10. 6-fold, 44.2-fold). In one patient with testicular microlithiasis, a previous orchidectomy for mixed germ cell tumor had been performed (not included in the relative risk calculation). CONCLUSION: In a referred population of 4819 patients the prevalence of testicular microlithiasis was 0.68% and the relative risk of concurrent tumor was 21.6-fold. Sonographic surveillance of testicular microlithiasis cases for tumor is mandatory.
Asunto(s)
Cálculos/diagnóstico por imagen , Cálculos/epidemiología , Enfermedades Testiculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Testiculares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Testiculares/epidemiología , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Escroto/diagnóstico por imagen , UltrasonografíaAsunto(s)
Directores de Hospitales , Obtención de Fondos/organización & administración , Hospitales Filantrópicos/organización & administración , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Relaciones Comunidad-Institución , Obtención de Fondos/tendencias , Hospitales Filantrópicos/tendencias , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Rol , Síndicos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Androgenic stimulation of sebaceous glands is an important factor in the development of acne. We examined 36 females (aged 14-34 years), selected because none had received oral contraceptives, anti-androgen therapy, or systemic antibiotics during the previous year, or isotretinoin therapy, prior to their participation in the study. Subjects were divided into groups on the basis of acne severity, as follows: physiological, mild and moderate. Only two patients had polycystic ovaries on ultrasound examination. Seven patients had irregular menses; none had evidence of hirsutism. We found that the severity of acne, based on the acne grade, was highly correlated with the inflammatory lesion count, and less correlated with the sebum excretion rate. Either acne grade or inflammatory lesion count could be related to some of the five androgenic hormone determinants; free testosterone (TESTOS), delta 4 androstenedione (DELTA 4), sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), dehydroepiandrostenedione sulphate (DHEAS) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT). Multiple linear regression analysis determined the best model for predicting ACNE scores as involving DELTA 4 and DHEAS (positive effects), and SHBG (negative effect), P < 0.005, R2 = 0.36). In none of the patients were the levels of DHEAS or SHBG outside the normal range. The findings in the two patients with polycystic ovaries did not differ significantly from those in the remainder of the patients.