Prevalence and prognostic implications of the no-reflux phenomenon in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention at a university center in a middle-income country.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the prevalence of no-reflow and the 30-day mortality in a university center in a middle-income country. METHOD: We analyzed 2463 patients who underwent primary PCI from January 2006 to December 2021. The outcome measure was 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Of a total of 2463 patients, no-reflow phenomenon was found in 413 (16.8%) patients, 30-day mortality was 16.7 vs. 4.29% (p < 0.001). Patients with no-reflow were older 60 (53-69.5) vs. 59 (51-66) (p = 0.001), with a higher delay in onset of symptom to emergency department arrival 270 vs. 247 min (p = 0.001). No-reflow patients also had had fewer previous myocardial infarction, 11.6 vs. 18.4 (p = 0.001) and a Killip class > 1, 37 vs. 26% (p < 0.001). No-reflow patients were more likely to have an anterior myocardial infarction (55.4 vs. 47.8%; p = 0.005) and initial TIMI flow 0 (76 vs. 68%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: No-reflow occurred in 16.8% of STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI and was more likely with older age, delayed presentation, anterior myocardial infarction and Killip class > 1. No-reflow was associated with a higher mortality at 30-day follow-up.

OBJETIVOS: Analizar la prevalencia de no reflujo y la mortalidad a 30 días en un centro universitario de un país de ingresos medios. MÉTODO: Analizamos 2,463 pacientes que se sometieron a ICP primaria desde enero de 2006 hasta diciembre de 2021. La medida de resultado fue la mortalidad a los 30 días. RESULTADOS: Del total de 2,463 pacientes, se encontró fenómeno de no reflujo en 413 (16.8%), la mortalidad a los 30 días fue del 16.7 vs. 4.29% (p < 0.001). Los pacientes sin reflujo tenían mayor edad 60 (53-69.5) vs. 59 (51-66) (p = 0.001), con mayor retraso del inicio de los síntomas a la llegada a urgencias, 270 vs. 247 min (p = 0.001). Los pacientes sin reflujo también tenían menos infarto de miocardio previo, 11.6 vs. 18.4 (p = 0.001), y una clase Killip > 1, 37 vs. 26% (p < 0.001). Los pacientes sin reflujo tenían más probabilidades de tener un infarto de miocardio anterior (55.4 vs. 47.8%; p = 0.005) y flujo TIMI inicial 0 (76 vs. 68%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIÓN: Ocurrió ausencia de reflujo en el 16.8% de los pacientes con IAMCEST sometidos a ICP primaria y fue más probable con la edad avanzada, presentación tardía, infarto de miocardio anterior y clase Killip > 1. El no reflujo se asoció con una mayor mortalidad a los 30 días de seguimiento.

[Acute myocardial infarction patients without COVID-19 manifestations in the pandemic may have high thrombus burden]. / Pacientes con infarto agudo de miocardio sin manifestaciones de COVID-19 pueden tener alta carga de trombo.

Objective: The objective of the study is to identify clinical and angiographic characteristics of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) but without clinical manifestations of COVID-19 infection during the pandemic, compared with patients 1 year before the pandemic. Methods: Observational study that included 138 consecutive patients hospitalized with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without COVID-19 infection during the 2020 pandemic. A group of 175 STEMI patients treated with PCI in the year before the pandemic served as the control group. Results: During the periods analyzed, compared with the control group, patients admitted during the pandemic without clinical manifestations of COVID-19 did not have significant differences in demographic characteristics, comorbidities, or delayed time and location of the acute myocardial infarction. Furthermore, there were no differences between the two groups concerning levels of CK-MB and NT-proBNP, or in inflammation markers and left ventricular ejection fraction. In patients without COVID-19 during the pandemic compared with control, we found a higher intracoronary thrombus burden (thrombus grade 5; 78.3% vs. 62.9%, respectively. p = 0.002). Accordingly, the use of glycoprotein IIB/IIIa inhibitors (37.7% vs. 26.3%, p = 0.03) was higher in these patients. Conclusions: This study demonstrates an increased thrombus burden in STEMI patients without clinical manifestation of COVID-19 during the pandemic compared with the same time period in the previous year.

Objetivo: Identificar las características clínicas y angiográficas de los pacientes con infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST (IAMCEST) sin manifestaciones clínicas de COVID-19 durante la pandemia y compararlos con los pacientes en el año previo. Métodos: Estudio observacional que incluyó 138 pacientes consecutivos que fueron hospitalizados por IAMCEST y que fueron tratados con angioplastía primaria (ACTP) sin manifestaciones clínicas de COVID-19 durante la pandemia de 2020. Se seleccionó a un grupo control de 175 pacientes con IAMCEST tratados con ACTP en el año previo a la pandemia. Resultados: Los pacientes atendidos durante la pandemia no tuvieron diferencias significativas en cuanto a las características clínicas, demográficas, comorbilidades, tiempo de retraso y localización del infarto. Además, no hubo diferencias entre ambos grupos en los niveles de CK-MB, NT-proBNP, marcadores de inflamación ni en la fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo. En los pacientes sin COVID-19 tratados durante la pandemia encontramos mayor carga trombótica intracoronaria (trombo grado 5; 78.3% vs. 62.9%, respectivamente. p = 0.002). De igual manera, el uso de inhibidores de la glucoproteina IIB/IIIa (37.7% vs. 26.3%, p = 0.03) fue mayor. Conclusiones: Este studio demostró un aumento en la carga trombótica en los pacientes con IAMCEST sin manifestaciones clínicas de COVID-19 durante la pandemia al compararlos con los pacientes tratados por la misma patología en el año previo.

Left atrial veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect with cardiogenic shock: a case report.

Background: Ventricular septal defect (VSD) complicating acute myocardial infarction (MI) represents a life-threatening condition and has a mortality of >90% if left untreated. Case summary: A 53-year-old man with a prior medical history of diabetes and hypertension presented with cardiogenic shock secondary to VSD as a mechanical complication of non-reperfused inferior MI. Discussion: The choice of mechanical support can be difficult in this type of patient. Given the risk of an increased shunt because of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and the increase in left ventricle (LV) afterload, several measures were taken to plan the best ECMO configuration. Given the absence of any real improvement in the LV and an elevated residual ratio between pulmonary and systemic flow (Qp/Qs), the final decision was to switch to left atrial VA-ECMO (LAVA-ECMO). The use of LAVA-ECMO improved the patient's haemodynamics and allowed his condition to stabilize; LAVA-ECMO is feasible and may be effective as a mechanical circulatory support (MCS) strategy for patients in cardiogenic shock due to VSD as a mechanical complication of acute MI.

Severe Acute Thrombocytopenia After Treatment with Tirofiban: A Case Series Approach.

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors are an adjuvant therapy for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes. The main adverse reactions are bleeding and thrombocytopenia in 1-2% of cases. A 66-year-old woman arrived at the emergency department with ST-elevation MI. The catheterisation lab was busy, so she received thrombolytic therapy. Coronary angiography revealed a 90% stenosis in the middle segment of the left anterior descending artery and Thrombolysis in MI 2 flow. Subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention showed abundant thrombus and a coronary dissection and it was necessary to insert five drug-eluting stents. Non-fractionated heparin and a tirofiban infusion were used. After the percutaneous coronary intervention, she developed severe thrombocytopenia, haematuria and gingivorrhagia, for which infusion of tirofiban was suspended. In follow-up, no major bleeding or subsequent haemorrhagic complications were identified. It is crucial to distinguish between heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombocytopenia caused by other drugs. A high level of suspicion should be employed in these cases.

Left circumflex artery injury occurring during mitral valve surgery treated successfully with percutaneous intervention in a high surgical and bleeding risk patient.

Perioperative myocardial infarction is a complication of cardiac surgery, and the cause can be multifactorial. Injury of the left circumflex coronary artery has been described, particularly after mitral valve replacement. We present the case of a 72-year-old woman who underwent mitral valve replacement but developed a lesion in the proximal circumflex coronary artery related to partial mechanical kinking caused by a suture. The therapeutic options are surgical or percutaneous. In this patient, the percutaneous strategy was successful. Learning objective: • Percutaneous coronary intervention is an option in cases involving kinking of the left circumflex coronary artery after mitral valve replacement.• If unable to cross the lesion with a workhorse guide wire, one alternative is to use wires with good support properties and avoid very high tip loads to reduce the risk of perforation.In patients at high risk of bleeding, use of a drug-eluting stent and short-duration dual antiplatelet therapy is recommended.

Application of the SCAI classification to admission of patients with cardiogenic shock: Analysis of a tertiary care center in a middle-income country.

AIMS: The Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) shock stages have been applied and validated in high-income countries with access to advanced therapies. We applied the SCAI scheme at the time of admission in order to improve the risk stratification for 30-day mortality in a retrospective cohort of patients with STEMI in a middle-income country hospital at admission. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 7,143 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. At admission, patients were stratified by the SCAI shock stages. Multivariate analysis was used to assess the association between SCAI shock stages to 30-day mortality. RESULTS: The distribution of the patients across SCAI shock stages was 82.2%, 9.3%, 1.2%, 1.5%, and 0.8% to A, B, C, D, and E, respectively. Patients with SCAI stages C, D, and E were more likely to have high-risk features. There was a stepwise significant increase in unadjusted 30-day mortality across the SCAI shock stages (6.3%, 8.4%, 62.4%, 75.2% and 88.3% for A, B, C, D and E, respectively; P < 0.0001, C-statistic, 0.64). A trend toward a lower 30-day survival probability was observed in the patients with advanced CS (30.3, 15.4%, and 8.3%, SCAI shock stages C, D, and E, respectively, Log-rank P-value <0.0001). After multivariable adjustment, SCAI shock stages C, D, and E were independently associated with an increased risk of 30-day death (hazard ratio 1.42 [P = 0.02], 2.30 [P<0.0001], and 3.44 [P<0.0001], respectively). CONCLUSION: The SCAI shock stages applied in patients con STEMI at the time of admission, is a useful tool for risk stratification in patients across the full spectrum of CS and is a predictor of 30-day mortality.

Cardiothoracic surgery and peripheral endovascular intervention in cardiovascular damage from a cohort of orphan rheumatological diseases-epidemiological and survival analysis.

Background: Aortic diseases in some orphan rheumatological diseases require medical, surgical or peripheral endovascular intervention because they can be catastrophic. Objectives: to analyze the main clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients with Takayasu arteritis (TA), Marfan syndrome (MS) and similar conditions that were treated with cardiothoracic surgery and peripheral endovascular intervention. Methods: Retrospective and descriptive cohort study that included patients of any age and gender with TA (as per the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology and EULAR/PRINTO), MS (according to Ghent criteria), and similar conditions who underwent cardiothoracic surgery or peripheral endovascular intervention. Data were collected from electronic charts. Results: A total of 77 patients with TA and 135 patients with MS and similar conditions were included. The frequency of surgical or interventional requirements in patients with TA and MS/similar conditions was 77/364 (21.2%) and 135/300 (45%), respectively; such patients were followed for a median of 6 [2-12] and 3.29 (0.42-6.62) years, with (maximum follow-up range of 47 and 21.37 years, respectively). Aneurysms were present in 11 (14.3%) and 66 (48.9%) in patients with TA and MS/similar conditions, respectively. Aortic, mitral and tricuspid valve damage occurred in 8 (10.4%) patients, 4 (5.2%) patients and 1 (1.3%) patient with TA, respectively; corresponding frequencies in patients with MS/similar conditions were 98 (72.6%), 50 (37.0%) and 20 (14.8%). We identified that 20% of patients with TA died after 5.08 years (95% CI: 0.23-25.42 years) and 20 % of the patients with MS and other similar conditions died after 7.52 years (95% CI: 1.10-9.02 years). Conclusions: The frequency of surgical intervention was low in this study. Long-term prognosis is good if surgery is performed in a timely manner. Epidemiological studies provide relevant information for public health decisions related to the management of orphan rheumatological diseases.

Bioprosthetic valve failure. Comparative trial of two balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve systems in intermediate-risk patients: a propensity score analysis.

BACKGROUND: The comparative mid and long-term durability, including the rates of bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) of the Sapien XT® and Sapien 3® transcatheter heart valve (THV) in patients with intermediate surgical risk has not been reported. METHODS: Consecutive intermediate-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis from the Mexican registry of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with Sapien® THVs were included. The primary endpoint was to compare the BVF rate between THVs at 2 years of follow-up. Secondary endpoints were comparisons of the composite of global mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and neurological events at 30 d and 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: During 2014-2019, 115 (60 Sapien XT® and 55 Sapien 3®) patients met the inclusion criteria in five medical centres. The mean age was 77.3 ± 8.4 years. The average Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) was 5.6 ± 2.9. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in BVF rate. At 30 d, overall, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality was 4.3%, 2.6%, and 1.7%, respectively. Neurological events rate was 1.73%. The mean long-term follow-up was 25.3 ± 14.2 months with an overall mortality of 9.56% but lower for the Sapien 3® group (15% vs. 3.6%, p=.037). The only independent predictor of composite mortality and neurological events that occurred in the long term was using a Sapien XT® [OR 1.6, CI 95%, 1.0-24.9; p=.049]. CONCLUSIONS: The BVF rate at 25 months of follow-up was similar with the XT and S3 systems. During this follow-up period, the major composite events of death from any cause and neurological events were significantly lower with the S3 system.

Cardiogenic Shock Among Patients with and without Acute Myocardial Infarction in a Latin American Country: A Single-Institution Study.

Background: Latin America has limited information about the full spectrum cardiogenic shock (CS) and its hospital outcome. This study sought to examine the temporal trends, clinical features and outcomes of patients with CS in a coronary care unit of single Mexican institution. Methods: This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients hospitalized with CS in a Mexican teaching hospital between 2006-2019. Patients were classified according to the presence or absence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Results: Of 22,747 admissions, 833 (3.7%) exhibited CS. Among patients with AMI (n = 12,438), 5% had AMI-CS, and in patients without AMI (n = 10,309), 2.3% developed CS (non-AMI-CS). Their median age was 63 years and 70.5% were men. Cardiovascular risk factors were more frequent among the AMI-CS group, whereas a history of heart failure was greater in non-AMI-CS patients (70.1%). In AMI-CS patients, the median delay time was 17.2 hours from the onset of AMI symptoms to hospital admission. Overall, the median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 30%. Patients with CS at admission showed end-organ dysfunction, evidenced by lactic acidosis, renal impairment, and elevated liver transaminases. Of the 620 AMI-CS patients, the main cause was left ventricular dysfunction in 71.3%, mechanical complications in 15.2% and right ventricular infarction in 13.5%. Among the 213 non-AMI-CS patients, valvular heart disease (49.3%) and cardiomyopathies (42.3%) were the most frequent etiologies. In-hospital all-cause mortality rates were 69.7% and 72.3% in the AMI-CS and non-AMI-CS groups, respectively. Among AMI-CS patients, renal dysfunction, diabetes, older age, depressed LVEF, absence of revascularization and the use of mechanical ventilation were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. However, in the non-AMI-CS group, only low LVEF and high lactate levels proved significant. Conclusions: This study demonstrates differences in the epidemiology of CS compared to high-income countries; the high mortality reflects critically ill patients and the lack of contemporary effective therapies in the population studied.

Pharmacoinvasive Strategy vs Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results From a Study in Mexico City.

BACKGROUND: A low proportion of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in low- to middle-income countries receive reperfusion therapy. Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the method of choice, a pharmacoinvasive strategy (PIs) is reasonable when primary PCI cannot be delivered on a timely basis. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a PIs compared with primary PCI in a real-world setting. METHODS: This was a prospective registry that included patients with STEMI who received reperfusion during the first 12 hours from symptom onset. The primary composite end point was the occurrence of cardiovascular death, cardiogenic shock, recurrent myocardial infarction, or congestive heart failure at 30 days according to the reperfusion strategy used. The key safety end point was major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] score 3-5) at 30 days. RESULTS: We included 579 patients with STEMI, 49.7% underwent primary PCI and 50.2% received PIs. Those who received a PIs approach were more likely to present with Killip class > 1 and to have a history of diabetes but were less likely to have a previous cardiovascular disease diagnosis. No statistically significant difference was shown in the primary composite end point according to reperfusion strategy (hazard ratio for PIs, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-1.21; P = 0.24). Major bleeding was not different among groups (hazard ratio for PIs, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-1.86; P = 0.81). Two patients in the PIs group (0.6%) and no patients in the PCI group had intracranial bleeding (P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective real-world registry, major cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding were not different among patients who underwent a PIs or primary PCI. The study suggests that a PIs is an effective and safe option for patients with STEMI when access to primary PCI is limited.

CONTEXTE: Une faible proportion des patients qui subissent un infarctus du myocarde avec élévation du segment ST (STEMI) dans les pays à revenus faibles/intermédiaires reçoivent un traitement de reperfusion. Même si l'intervention coronarienne percutanée (ICP) primaire constitue la méthode de prédilection, une stratégie pharmaco-invasive  représente une option raisonnable lorsque l'ICP primaire ne peut être réalisée dans un délai acceptable. Cette étude visait à évaluer l'efficacité et l'innocuité d'une stratégie pharmaco-invasive comparativement à une ICP primaire dans la pratique courante. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Cette étude consistait en une étude de registre prospective et regroupait des patients présentant un STEMI et ayant subi une reperfusion pendant les 12 heures suivant l'apparition des symptômes. Le principal critère d'évaluation regroupé correspondait à l'occurrence du décès cardiovasculaire, du choc cardiogénique, d'une récidive de l'infarctus du myocarde ou d'une insuffisance cardiaque congestive dans les 30 jours suivants, selon la stratégie de reperfusion utilisée. Le principal critère d'évaluation de l'innocuité était les hémorragies majeures (score de 3 à 5 selon le Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC]) à 30 jours. RÉSULTATS: L'étude regroupait 579 patients présentant un STEMI, dont 49,7 % avaient subi une ICP primaire et 50,2 % avaient reçu une stratégie pharmaco-invasive. Les patients ayant reçu une stratégie pharmaco-invasive étaient plus susceptibles de présenter une classe de Killip > 1 et des antécédents de diabète, mais étaient moins susceptibles d'avoir déjà reçu un diagnostic de maladie cardiovasculaire. Aucune différence significative sur le plan statistique n'a été observée pour ce qui est du principal critère d'évaluation regroupé selon la stratégie de reperfusion (rapport des risques instantanés [RRI] de la stratégie pharmaco-invasive : 0,76; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % : 0,48-1,21; p = 0,24). Aucune différence n'a été observée entre les groupes quant aux hémorragies majeures (RRI de la stratégie pharmaco-invasive : 0,92; IC à 95 % : 0,45-1,86; p = 0,81). Deux patients du groupe ayant reçu une stratégie pharmaco-invasive (0,6 %) ont présenté une hémorragie intracrânienne, comparativement à aucun patient du groupe ayant subi une ICP (p = 0,15). CONCLUSIONS: Selon cette étude de registre prospective en pratique courante, les résultats concernant les hémorragies et les événements cardiovasculaires majeurs n'ont pas été différents entre les patients ayant subi une ICP primaire et ceux ayant reçu une stratégie pharmaco-invasive. L'étude suggère que la stratégie pharmaco-invasive constitue une option sûre et efficace pour les patients qui présentent un STEMI, lorsque l'accès à une ICP primaire est limité.

Patient care protocols and personal safety measures for health care professionals in cardiac catheterization rooms during the COVID-19 outbreak in the National Institute of Cardiology.

The COVID-19 was first described in late 2019 that quickly became a pandemic affecting every health system as we know it. The high transmissibility among humans represents a well-known high burden of morbidity and mortality not only for cardiovascular patients but also for a higher risk between health care professionals that must deliver high-quality care to them in any scenario, and cardiac catheterization rooms are no exception. This creates a new dilemma, minimize exposure to patients and health care professionals to COVID-19 while maintaining high quality in cardiovascular therapeutics. In order to achieve this, several international recommendations on treatment algorithms modifications and in safety measures in the catheterization room have been published, always aiming to solve this dilemma in the best possible way. Hereby, we present a summary of the most recent treatment algorithms in the most important cardiovascular interventions (acute coronary syndromes, structural and congenital heart diseases) as well as specific safety measures with a step-by-step preparedness before and after any interventional procedure during COVID-19 outbreak. The objective of this document is to inform and to train health care professionals that works in cardiac catheterization rooms on the risks as well on the plan for containment, mitigation, and response to the global situation of COVID-19 infection in order to apply this in their own local work environments.

Acute Aortic Syndrome of Ascending Thoracic Aorta: Transcarotid Percutaneous Exclusion of a Ruptured Pseudoaneurysm.

Treatment of ascending aorta disease is surgical; however, some series have evaluated the effectiveness of endovascular treatment. We report the case of a patient with a ruptured pseudoaneurysm who underwent endovascular repair via the left common carotid artery. The clinical and neurological evolution was satisfactory during the in-hospital follow-up. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Intervención coronaria percutánea del tronco no protegido de la coronaria izquierda comparada con cirugía de revascularización coronaria; experiencia de 3 años en el Instituto Nacional de Cardiología / Percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary compared with coronary artery bypass grafting; 3 years of experience in the National Institute of Cardiology, Mexico

Resumen Antecedentes: El mejor método para el tratamiento de la revascularización de la lesión del tronco no protegido de la coronaria izquierda es un tema de creciente interés. Método: Se realizaron un total de 2,439 intervenciones coronarias percutáneas (ICP) durante 3 años; se incluyeron los pacientes con lesión del tronco no protegido de la coronaria izquierda (TCI; n = 48) y se compararon con pacientes a los que se realizó cirugía de revascularización coronaria (CRVC; n = 50). Se analizaron los eventos cardiovasculares en fase hospitalaria y extrahospitalaria. El promedio de seguimiento fue de 16 meses. Resultados: El riesgo cardiovascular fue mayor en pacientes con ICP; log EuroSCORE (16 ± 21 vs. 5 ± 6, p = 0.001), Syntax clínico (77 ± 74 vs. 53 ± 39, p = 0.04). Los pacientes del grupo de ICP presentaron al ingreso con más frecuencia infarto con elevación del ST (IMCEST) y con choque cardiogénico. Los eventos hospitalarios fueron similares en ICP y CRVC (14% vs. 18%, p = 0.64). El IMCEST fue menos frecuente en el grupo de ICP (0% vs. 10%, p = 0.03. Los eventos cardiovasculares fueron menores en el grupo de ICP (2.3% vs. 18%, p = 0.01) y hubo una disminución de la muerte general y cardiaca (2.3% vs. 12%, p = 0.08 y 2.3% vs. 8%, p = 0.24), al excluir los pacientes con choque cardiogénico como presentación. En la fase extrahospitalaria los eventos fueron similares en ICP y CRVC (15% vs. 12%, p = 0.46). La supervivencia sin eventos cardiovasculares, muerte general y cardiaca fueron comparables entre los grupos (log rank, p = 0.38, p = 0.44 y p = 0.16). Conclusión: Pese a que los pacientes de ICP mostraron un perfil de riesgo mayor que los de CRVC, la seguridad y eficacia intrahospitalaria y extrahospitalaria fueron similares. © 2016 Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez. Publicado por Masson Doyma México S.A. Este es un artículo Open Access bajo la licencia CC BY-NC-ND (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Abstract Background: The best revascularisation method of the unprotected left main artery is a current and evolving topic. Methods: A total of 2439 percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) were registered during a 3-year period. The study included all the patients with PCI of the unprotected left main coronary (n = 48) and matched with patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) (n = 50). Major adverse cerebral and cardiac events (MACCE) were assessed within the hospital and in outpatients during a 16 month follow up. Results: The cardiovascular risk was greater in the PCI group; logEuroSCORE 16 ± 21 vs. 5 ± 6, P = .001; clinical Syntax 77 ± 74 vs 53 ± 39, P = .04. On admission, the PCI group of patients had a higher frequency of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and cardiogenic shock. The MACCE were similar in both groups (14% vs. 18%, P = .64). STEMI was less frequent in the PCI group (0% vs. 10%, P = .03). Cardiovascular events were lower in the PCI group (2.3% vs. 18%, P = .01), and there was a decrease in general and cardiac mortality (2.3% vs. 12%, P = .08 y 2.3% vs. 8%, P = .24), on excluding the patients with cardiogenic shock as a presentation. MACCE were similar in both groups in the out-patient phase (15% vs. 12%, P = .46). Survival without MACCE, general and cardiac death were comparable between groups (log rank, P = .38, P = .44 and P = .16, respectively). Conclusion: Even though the clinical and periprocedural risk profile of the PCI patients were higher, the in-hospital and out-hospital efficacy and safety were comparable with CABG. © 2016 Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez. Published by Masson Doyma México S.A. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

[Percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary compared with coronary artery bypass grafting; 3 years of experience in the National Institute of Cardiology, Mexico]. / Intervención coronaria percutánea del tronco no protegido de la coronaria izquierda comparada con cirugía de revascularización coronaria; experiencia de 3 años en el Instituto Nacional de Cardiología.

BACKGROUND: The best revascularisation method of the unprotected left main artery is a current and evolving topic. METHODS: A total of 2439 percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) were registered during a 3-year period. The study included all the patients with PCI of the unprotected left main coronary (n=48) and matched with patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) (n=50). Major adverse cerebral and cardiac events (MACCE) were assessed within the hospital and in outpatients during a 16 month follow up. RESULTS: The cardiovascular risk was greater in the PCI group; logEuroSCORE 16±21 vs. 5±6, P=.001; clinical Syntax 77±74 vs 53±39, P=.04. On admission, the PCI group of patients had a higher frequency of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and cardiogenic shock. The MACCE were similar in both groups (14% vs. 18%, P=.64). STEMI was less frequent in the PCI group (0% vs. 10%, P=.03). Cardiovascular events were lower in the PCI group (2.3% vs. 18%, P=.01), and there was a decrease in general and cardiac mortality (2.3% vs. 12%, P=.08 y 2.3% vs. 8%, P=.24), on excluding the patients with cardiogenic shock as a presentation. MACCE were similar in both groups in the out-patient phase (15% vs. 12%, P=.46). Survival without MACCE, general and cardiac death were comparable between groups (log rank, P=.38, P=.44 and P=.16, respectively). CONCLUSION: Even though the clinical and peri-procedural risk profile of the PCI patients were higher, the in-hospital and out-hospital efficacy and safety were comparable with CABG.