Intravenous thrombolysis for large vessel or distal occlusions presenting with mild stroke severity.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We investigated the effectiveness of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel or distal occlusions and mild neurological deficits, defined as National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores < 6 points. METHODS: The primary efficacy outcome was 3-month functional independence (FI) [modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores 0-2] that was compared between patients with and without IVT treatment. Other efficacy outcomes of interest included 3-month favorable functional outcome (mRS scores 0-1) and mRS score distribution at discharge and at 3 months. The safety outcomes comprised all-cause 3-month mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), asymptomatic ICH and severe systemic bleeding. RESULTS: We evaluated 336 AIS patients with large vessel or distal occlusions and mild stroke severity (mean age 63 ± 15 years, 45% women). Patients treated with IVT (n = 162) had higher FI (85.6% vs. 74.8%, P = 0.027) with lower mRS scores at hospital discharge (P = 0.034) compared with the remaining patients. No differences were detected in any of the safety outcomes including symptomatic ICH, asymptomatic ICH, severe systemic bleeding and 3-month mortality. IVT was associated with higher likelihood of 3-month FI [odds ratio (OR), 2.19; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.09-4.42], 3-month favorable functional outcome (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.10-3.57), functional improvement at discharge [common OR (per 1-point decrease in mRS score), 2.94; 95% CI, 1.67-5.26)] and at 3 months (common OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.06-2.86) on multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for potential confounders, including mechanical thrombectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous thrombolysis is independently associated with higher odds of improved discharge and 3-month functional outcomes in AIS patients with large vessel or distal occlusions and mild stroke severity. IVT appears not to increase the risk of systemic or symptomatic intracranial bleeding.

Spinal arteriovenous metameric syndrome: clinical manifestations and endovascular management.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: SAMS is a rare form of SCAVM. We discuss the clinical presentation, endovascular management, and outcome of this disease in our series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review was performed in patients with SCAVM and SAMS who underwent angiography with intent to treat at our institution from 1980 to 2010. RESULTS: One hundred forty-eight SCAVMs were identified, and 28 (19%) of these were SAMS. Of these 28 patients, 24 had nidus-type AVMs and 4 had fistulas. SAMS were more prevalent in females (71% versus 48%), and also presented earlier than non-SAMS SCAVMs. Intradural hemorrhage (SAH or hematomyelia) was the most common presentation and more common than in non-SAMS lesions. Twenty-six patients underwent embolization of the intradural lesion in 50 sessions. Thirteen patients underwent treatment of intradural aneurysms in 16 sessions. Six patients underwent embolization of extradural lesions in 16 sessions. Twenty-three patients had an average of 94 months of clinical follow-up (3-309 months) after the first treatment, during which 5 patients had hemorrhages. Angiographic follow-up was performed in 20 patients at an average of 85 months (range, 3-309 months), which showed new development or enlargement of an aneurysm in 5 patients. This type of angiographic progression was more common in patients with SAMS. CONCLUSIONS: SAMS most commonly presents with hemorrhage from the SCAVM. Endovascular embolization can be performed safely with good functional outcome, though most patients clinically deteriorate in the long term. Periodic angiographic follow-up with intent to perform preventive target embolization is important to control the disease.

Pimozide treatment of the negative schizophrenic syndrome: an open trial.

Reports over the last 20 years suggest that pimozide, a neuroleptic of the diphenylbutylpiperidine (DPBP) group, might be helpful in the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia, which are considered less responsive to standard neuroleptics than are positive symptoms. Research suggests that neuroleptic drugs of the DPBP group possess a unique property--potent calcium channel antagonism--which could explain their ability to relieve negative symptoms. Earlier reports, however, used measures not specifically designed to assess the negative syndrome. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was developed and standardized to measure the negative syndrome in schizophrenia. The authors used the PANSS to study the effects of pimozide in a 6-week, open clinical trial with 10 neuroleptic-resistant schizophrenic inpatients who had prominent deficit features. Negative but not positive symptoms improved significantly, suggesting that the drug might target the negative profile. The authors discuss possible pharmacologic mechanisms for pimozide's potentially distinct clinical properties.