RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) for skull base pathologies, endoscope view obscuration remains a persistent, time-consuming, and distracting issue for surgeons and may result in increased operative time. The endonasal access guide (EAG) has been demonstrated as a possible adjunct to minimize these events. However, to date, there have been no comparative studies performed and the potential time savings by using EAGs have yet to be quantified. This cohort study aimed to determine the operative efficiency benefits of the EAG in EEA operations. METHODS: Analysis of EEA operative videos from an EAG cohort (n = 20) and a control cohort (n = 20) was performed, assessing 12-minute segments in the first, middle, and last third of each operation. The first segment in each cohort was selected before EAG placement, serving as an internal control. Every endoscope lens soiling instance was counted (measured as cleaning actions per minute), timed (obscuration time %), and identified as a withdrawal, irrigation, or other cleaning action. Perioperative variables including skull base repair and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage were assessed. RESULTS: Within the EAG cohort, obscuration time was reduced in the middle and last third compared with the first third (3.73% [CI: 2.39-5.07] vs 12.97% [CI: 10.24-15.70], P < .001; 4.19% [CI: 2.83-5.55] vs 12.97% [CI: 10.24-15.70], P < .001) and cleaning actions were also significantly reduced by EAG (0.69/min [CI: 0.39-0.99] vs 1.67/min [CI: 1.34-2.00], P = .001; 0.66/min [CI: 0.35-0.97] vs 1.67/min [CI: 1.34-2.00], P < .001). Between the control and EAG cohorts, there was no significant difference between obscuration time and cleaning actions in the first third (9.33% vs 12.97%, P = .086; 1.34/min vs 1.67/min, P = .151) or in the middle third (6.24% vs 3.73%, P = .140; 0.80/min vs 0.69/min, P = .335), but there was a significant difference in the last third (9.25% [CI: 6.95-11.55] vs 4.19% [CI: 2.83-5.55], P < .001; 0.95/min [CI: 0.73-1.17] vs 0.66/min [CI: 0.35-0.97], P = .018). CONCLUSION: EAG significantly reduces lens obscurations and cleaning events, particularly during the intradural portion of operations. This technology may offer a greater time-saving impact with patients undergoing long EEA operations.
RESUMEN
The purpose of this article is to explain the anatomy of the pterygopalatine ganglion (PPG), its location in the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) in the skull, and the relationship it has to the Vidian nerve terminal branches and the fifth cranial nerve. An overview of the neuro-anatomical/clinical correlations, a spectrum of pathologies affecting the seventh cranial nerve and some therapies both medical and surgical are noted. The focus is the pterygopalatine region with discussion of the proximal courses of the seventh and fifth cranial nerves and their pathological processes. The ganglion is used as an example of neuro-anatomical model for explaining cluster headaches (CH). Radiological correlation is included to clarify the location of the PPF and its clinical importance.
RESUMEN
The subtemporal transtentorial approach provides excellent exposure of the incisural space. Incision of the tentorium improves access to the interpeduncular cistern, basilar artery, and rostral ventral pons. Description of the starting and termination points of the tentorial incision has varied greatly. We assessed the impact on surgical exposure of freeing the trochlear nerve (TN) from its dural canal (DC) in addition to dividing and retracting the tentorium. A subtemporal approach was performed on 10 hemispheres of cadaveric specimens. Following exposure of the middle tentorial incisura, the TN is dissected from its DC over a few millimeters. Two retraction sutures are placed along the tentorial edge, posterior to the TN entrance in its DC. The tentorial incision is started between the sutures. Dissection of TN from its DC continues for a short distance. The tentorial incision is extended straight up towards the superior petrosal sinus. Dissection of the TN DC continues anteriorly, up to its entry into the cavernous sinus. The tentorial incision can then be extended, just over the entrance to Meckel's cave, and the flap reflected far anterolateraly. Using this technique, the exposure of the interpeduncular cistern and its content increased by a mean of 8.2 mm (standard deviation [SD] 3.9 mm) in the anteroposterior axis and by 5.5mm (SD 1.9 mm) in the rostrocaudal axis. Tentorial incision following dissection of the TN from its DC optimizes reflection of the tentorium flap anterolateraly, maximizes the exposure, and improves lighting and visibility as well as maneuverability within the interpeduncular and rostral pre-pontine cisterns.
