RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Advances in optics and instrumentation with the da Vinci S Surgical System have facilitated minimally invasive and robotic cardiac procedures including mitral valve repair and atrial myxoma excision. We report our retrospective data comparing robotically assisted myxoma excision with standard median sternotomy excision. METHODS: Data were collected for cardiac myxoma resection performed between January 2000 and December 2009. The resulting cohort included a total of 57 patients. These patients were grouped into two categories: robotic-assisted (n = 17) surgical procedures and traditional (nonrobotic; n = 40) surgical procedures. Presurgical and surgical risk factors were examined. RESULTS: Univariate analysis comparing the surgical procedure groups and surgical risk factors found a significant difference in 3 of the 14 variables. Cannulation in all patients undergoing robotic-assisted cardiac myxoma excision was performed through cannulating the common femoral artery and vein while cannulation for the traditional procedures was performed using the aorta and atrium except for two patients. For aortic occlusion, 14 of the robotic-assisted cardiac myxoma patients had balloon occlusion and 34 of the traditional cardiac myxoma patients had aortic cross-clamp occlusion. Operating time was significantly shorter for robotic cases (2.7 hours) compared with traditional cases (3.5 hours). CONCLUSION: Robotic excision of atrial myxomas is safe and may be an alternative to traditional open surgery in selected patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Cardíacas/cirugía , Mixoma/cirugía , Robótica , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Atrios Cardíacos/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Esternotomía , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Apendicitis/diagnóstico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Apendicitis/sangre , Apendicitis/clasificación , Recuento de Células Sanguíneas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Examen Físico , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence and clinical/pathologic characteristics of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PMC) in a community hospital setting and to evaluate the frequency and characteristics of these lesions when unsuspected preoperatively. METHODS: A total of 723 patients underwent a partial or total thyroidectomy. A retrospective review was performed. RESULTS: A total of 194 of the 723 patients had a final diagnosis of papillary carcinoma. Ninety-six (49%) of these tumors were PMCs defined as being 1.0 cm or less in diameter. One third (32 of 96) of these lesions were multifocal and 16.7% (16 of 96) were found to have regional lymph node metastases. The majority (58%) of PMCs were found on final pathology and were clinically unsuspected (occult). Multifocality was found in 32.1% (18 of 56) of patients with clinically unsuspected PMC, with nodal metastases in 3.6% (2 of 56). The other 40 patients with PMC had surgeries performed for a clinical reason related to that pathologic lesion. This clinically suspected group was comparably multifocal (35%), but more likely to have cervical lymph node metastasis (35%). Sixty-six percent (37 of 56) diagnosed with a clinically unsuspected PMC underwent a partial thyroidectomy at the initial surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of clinically unsuspected PMC in our population undergoing thyroidectomy was 7.7% (56 of 723). In our institution, this is more than half of all PMCs. The incidence of cervical lymph node metastasis in clinically unsuspected PMC was only 3.6% compared with 35% in clinically suspected disease, suggesting that the biological behavior (and possibly treatment) may be different. Long-term follow-up evaluation is needed to better evaluate the significance of these differences.
Asunto(s)
Hallazgos Incidentales , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/diagnóstico , Adulto , Carcinoma , Carcinoma Papilar , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuello , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cáncer Papilar Tiroideo , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/patología , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/cirugía , TiroidectomíaRESUMEN
This study investigated and compared the risk factors and outcomes of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery with and without the occurrence of prolonged mechanical ventilation. Data in a cardiac surgery database were examined retrospectively. Data selected included any isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery performed by the surgical group from August 2005 to June 2009. The resulting cohort included a total of 2933 patients which was comprised of 116 patients with a ventilation time of greater than 72 hours (prolonged ventilation) and 2817 patients with a ventilation time of 72 hours or less (no prolonged ventilation). Patients with a prolonged ventilation time were matched (1:3 ratio) to patients not requiring a prolonged ventilation time by year of surgery resulting in our study cohort of 464 patients. To generate the unadjusted risks of each factor, χ(2) and t test analysis were performed. Logistic regression analysis was then used to investigate the adjusted risk between cases and controls and each of the significant variables. χ(2) and t tests were conducted comparing cases and controls with the outcome variables. Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft that experienced a prolonged ventilation time (cases) were more likely female, had a New York Hospital Association functional class of III or IV, and had a longer perfusion time. There was no significant difference between cases and controls with diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, or body mass index while controlling for all significant risk factors. Careful patient selection and preparation during preoperative evaluation may help identify patients at risk for prolonged mechanical ventilation and thus help prevent the added morbidity and mortality associated with it.
Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Respiración Artificial , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction in an outpatient community-based surgical clinic to seek opportunities for improvement. METHODS: A paper survey was distributed to patients at the Faculty Medical Center Clinic over a 12-week period. The survey allowed patients to rate their experience on a 5-point scale from "very dissatisfied" to "very satisfied." The survey addressed referral to the clinic, appointment scheduling, visit experience, wait times, laboratory testing, and satisfaction with surgery. Separate from the surveys, data were collected regarding wait time in clinic prior to being placed in an examining room, time spent waiting for the physician, time spent with the physician, overall time spent in clinic, and appointment time to surgery. RESULTS: During the 12-week time period, 87 surveys were returned from patients in the surgery clinic for a 69% response rate. Most patients were referred to the surgery clinic from the emergency department or their primary care physicians at 44% and 43%, respectively. Just over half of the patients responded that they were "very satisfied" with their overall experience. Of those surveyed, 40% of patients were "very satisfied" with their wait time for the first visit to the clinic, 52% with time in waiting room, 43% with time in examining room, and 47% with time spent with physician. Only 16.4% of patients were "very dissatisfied" or "mostly dissatisfied" with time waiting for appointment, 17.9% with time available for appointment, 14.3% with time in waiting room, 18.2% in time waiting in examination room for the physician, and 20.9% of time wait to schedule surgery. Data were also collected on 203 surgical clinic patients during this time. Of the 203 patients, 55% were new patients, 31% were postoperative patients, and 14% were in the clinic for another type of visit. CONCLUSIONS: Overall patient satisfaction was good for the clinic, yet there were areas to improve. Efficiency of scheduling patients, improving wait time for waiting room, examining room, and time prior to scheduling surgery are areas that need improvement. Modification of the current practice at the surgery clinic could result in improvement of patient satisfaction in future evaluation.
Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Satisfacción del Paciente , Centros Médicos Académicos , Recolección de Datos , Eficiencia Organizacional , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Ohio , Listas de EsperaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) restricts residents from working more than 80 hours per week averaged over a 4-week period. No such restriction exists, however, for attending surgeons. Little exploration has been done of the public's perception of the number of hours that surgeons work and how residents work with the staff surgeons at a teaching institution. METHODS: A survey was designed to study the public's belief on surgeon work hours and habits. The survey also asked their opinion on resident involvement. All patients and accompanying persons arriving through the Surgicare Center for elective procedures older than age 18 were surveyed. The overall survey responses were calculated, and the results then were stratified by sex, age, race, and education. RESULTS: Of the 1516 surveys distributed, 370 were completed and returned (24.4%). Of those responding, 91% believed that a work hour limit should be in place for surgeons, and 77% believed the limit should be 12 consecutive hours or less. Eighty-four percent of the population believed that limit should be in place on the hours/week that a surgeon works, and 68% believe that it should be 60 hours or less. Although 82% would reschedule if they knew their surgeon had less than 4 hours of sleep the night before their procedure, 79% trust their surgeon's judgment to cancel if he/she were too tired. Only 28% of those surveyed were aware whether a resident was involved in their care, and 14% were against resident involvement. Respondents also were asked if the attending surgeon deemed a resident capable, then what percent of the procedure should the resident be able to perform? Ninety-one percent of those surveyed believed that the attending should be present for the entire case, and 78% believed that they should not be able to schedule more than 1 procedure at any given time. CONCLUSIONS: These findings illustrate a difference between the public's beliefs in regard to the hours a surgeon should be permitted to work and the reality of a surgeon's work life. Although the public may not be aware of the surgeon's schedule at a given time, they do trust the surgeon would cancel if too fatigued. The majority surveyed were not aware of resident involvement, but they trusted the attending surgeon's judgment with deciding how much of the actual procedure he/she could perform. With work-hour restrictions and resident involvement continuing to evolve, keeping the public informed should be a priority.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía General/normas , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Hospitales de Enseñanza/normas , Admisión y Programación de Personal , Opinión Pública , Carga de Trabajo , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Cultura , Atención a la Salud , Femenino , Cirugía General/tendencias , Hospitales de Enseñanza/tendencias , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , Tolerancia al Trabajo Programado , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patient quality outcomes are a major focus of the health care industry. It is unknown what effect involvement in graduate medical education (GME) has on patient outcomes. The purpose of this study is to begin to examine whether GME involvement in postoperative care impacts patient quality outcomes. METHODS: The retrospective cohort included all patients who underwent a nonemergent colectomy from January 1, 2007 to January 1, 2008 at a 2-hospital system. Data collected included patient demographics, patient quality outcomes, complications, and GME involvement. Patient quality outcomes were based on compliance with the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 159 nonemergent colectomies were analyzed. The GME group accounted for 116 (73%) patients. A significant difference was found in several SCIP process-based measures of quality when comparing the GME group with the non-GME group. Postoperative antibiotics were more likely to be stopped within 24 hours (p = 0.010), and preoperative heparin and postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis were more likely to be administered (p < 0.001). Additionally, patients in the GME group showed improved quality outcomes as there were significantly fewer postoperative complications (p < 0.001) and a shorter duration of stay (p = 0.008). The use of gastrointestinal prophylaxis was more common in the non-GME group (p = 0.002). No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in respect to age, sex, diabetes, preoperative antibiotics, antibiotics, 1 hour before surgery, postoperative antibiotics, and continuation of home beta blockade. CONCLUSIONS: GME at teaching institutions has a positive impact on patient quality outcomes. At our institution, many of the SCIP measurable outcomes had improved compliance if an attending physician participated in the GME program.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/normas , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Competencia Clínica , Colectomía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: More than one third of adults in the United States are obese. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) has become necessary for many obese persons. We evaluated the effect of this procedure on in-hospital mortality and morbidity of patients based on their body mass index (BMI). METHODS: Data in a cardiac surgery database were examined retrospectively. Data selected from the database included CABG surgery from January 2003 to December 2007. The resulting cohort included a total of 10,590 patients. The BMI was grouped into four categories: underweight (BMI < or = 19), normal weight (BMI 20 to 29), obese (BMI 30 to 39), and morbidly obese (BMI > or = 40). Regression analysis was conducted to determine whether BMI was an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality after CABG. RESULTS: Our results indicate that patients with an obese BMI are not at greater risk for morbidity or mortality after CABG. Logistic regression analysis found that CABG patients in the underweight body mass index group had the greatest risk of mortality, prolonged ventilation, reoperation for bleeding, and renal failure. Linear regression indicated length of hospital stay and intensive care unit stay after surgery were the longest for patients with an underweight BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the comorbidities that are often present with obesity, an obese BMI was not found to be an independent predictor of morbidity or mortality after CABG. On the contrary, the underweight patients are at greater risk for mortality and complications after CABG surgery.
Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/métodos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Obesidad/complicaciones , Anciano , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad , Obesidad/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess outcome differences in aortic valve replacement based on gender. METHODS: A study from a ten-year hospitalization cohort with prospective data collection was conducted. Included in the study were patients undergoing aortic valve replacement surgery between March 1997 and July 2003 (N=406). There were 223 males and 183 females included in the study. The study examined 41 potential confounding risk factors and 16 outcome variables. RESULTS: Univariate analysis on potential confounding risk factors revealed a significant difference between males and females on 12 factors. Co-morbid disease, hypertension, current vascular disease, aortic insufficiency, body surface area, blood added on pump, and annulus size significantly correlated with age. The correlation resulted in five confounding risk factors: age, tobacco history, obesity, left ventricular hypertrophy, and creatinine level. Logistic regression analysis found that after controlling for age, tobacco history, obesity, left ventricular hypertrophy, and creatinine level, there is no difference between males and females on outcomes following aortic valve replacement. Additionally, choice of vascular prosthesis had no impact on post-operative outcomes. CONCLUSION: After controlling for confounding variables, similar outcomes were observed for males and females undergoing aortic valve replacement.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Anciano , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The study objective was to determine predictors, and adverse outcomes of postoperative type II neurologic complications. An 11-year cohort (N=12,706) study with 595 coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients with a neurologic complication, and 7793 patients without any neurologic complications was conducted. This study examined 26 potential risk factors and 13 outcome variables. Logistic regression analysis found that patients were more likely to experience a neurologic complication after CABG if they were older than 70 years of age [odds ratio (OR), 3.8; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.1-4.5; P < 0.001], had a previous intervention within 10 days before surgery (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.4-8.3; P = 0.008), or had a higher creatinine level (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99; P = 0.013). Additionally, there was a significant difference between CABG patients with and without neurologic complications on 12 outcome variables. Type II neurologic complications after CABG are common and associated with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/etiología , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Although rare, aortic dissection is one of the most devastating, but least studied, intraoperative complications. The objective of this study was to assess risk factors of aortic dissection and assess outcomes in patients with aortic dissection experience. METHODS: A study from a 10-year hospitalization cohort (N = 12,907) with prospective data collection was conducted. Patients without aortic dissection were matched to 33 aortic dissection patients 3:1 on the type of procedure. The study examined 24 potential confounding risk factors and 12 outcome variables. RESULTS: Univariate analysis on potential confounding risk factors revealed two significant risk factors. There was a significant difference between aortic dissection and nonaortic dissection patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (p = 0.03). Patients with aortic dissection were more likely to be in Class I or II. Patients with aortic dissection had significantly longer perfusion time (p = 0.008). There was a significant difference between patients with and without aortic dissection on four outcome variables. Patients with an aortic dissection were more likely to need prolonged ventilation (p = 0.046), have renal failure (p = 0.005), require intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) (0.043), and have a higher mortality rate (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Aortic dissection occurs infrequently during coronary artery bypass grafting, but is a devastating complication and greatly increases morbidity. Although few patients dissect intraoperatively, this study attempted to identify predictors that may label a patient as high risk for possible aortic dissection. Although two factors in this study were statistically significant, they are not reliable preoperative predictors of high-risk patients that can be used to screen patients and help prevent aortic dissection and its sequela.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta/etiología , Disección Aórtica/etiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Atención Perioperativa , Cirugía Torácica , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Indicadores de Salud , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: With the institution of the 80-hour work week, residency programs have worked to institute programs that decrease the time that residents spend in the hospital while maintaining patient safety. This study was intended to assess the amount of time saved using computerized patient information in the form of a personal data assistant (PDA). METHODS: A community hospital surgical residency program with 22 residents initially collected data daily for 4 weeks without PDA use. Data included preround time, check-out time, total number of patients, number of medical/surgical patients, and number of intensive care unit patients. The definition of prerounding time was started when residents first began collecting information on their patients in the morning until 6:00 am. Check-out time started at 5:00 pm and lasted until the discussion of patient care with the night team had finished. Residents were then given PDAs allowing immediate up-to-date access to patient information, which most importantly included current vital signs, laboratory data, radiological dictations, medication lists, and fluid intake and output. After a 4-week acquaintance period with the PDA had passed, data were again collected from the residents daily for 4 weeks. Daily averages for each week and an overall total average were calculated. Daily averages were also calculated for each PGY level. Paired t-tests compared the pre-PDA and post-PDA total averages. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the total number of patients pre-PDA and post-PDA (7.6 and 7.6, respectively, p = 0.98), the average number of medical/surgical patients (4.7 and 7.1, respectively, p = 0.16), or the average number of intensive care unit patients (2.6 and 0.4, respectively, p = 0.06). Also, no significant difference was found between pre-PDA and post-PDA with average check-out time (24.5 minutes and 21.9 minutes, respectively, p = 0.06). However, a significant decrease in rounding time occurred with pre-PDA round time at 50.5 minutes and post-PDA round time at 40.7 minutes (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Results of this study support the hypothesis that the prerounding time dramatically decreases with the PDA compared to without. Not only does this decrease in time help to keep residents under the 80-hour work week rule, but also it helps to eliminate much of the confusion that can cause patient safety issues.
Asunto(s)
Computadoras de Mano/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía General/educación , Hospitales Comunitarios/organización & administración , Internado y Residencia/organización & administración , Sistemas de Registros Médicos Computarizados/organización & administración , Carga de Trabajo , Adulto , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Eficiencia Organizacional , Humanos , Ohio , Admisión y Programación de Personal/organización & administración , Estudios de Tiempo y MovimientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to examine the influence of gender in diabetic patients following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. METHODS: A study from an 11-year hospitalization cohort with prospective data collection was conducted. Included in the study were diabetic patients undergoing CABG surgery between October 1993 and May 2004 (n = 2781). Patients who underwent any surgery other than CABG or had a previous cardiac surgery were excluded. The study examined 25 risk factors and 14 outcome variables. RESULTS: Twelve risk factors were found to be significantly different between male and female diabetic patients undergoing CABG. Correlation coefficients were computed among the 12 significant risk factors. Three main risk factors emerged: age 70 years or greater, abnormal LVH, and number of grafts. For outcome variables, females experienced more renal complications, intraoperative complications, longer hospital stay, and mortality. Logistic regression analysis showed that after controlling for age, LVH, and number of grafts, female diabetic patients undergoing CABG were more likely to experience intraoperative complications (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.0, p = 0.025) and longer hospital stay (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97-0.99, p = 0.039). However, there was no significant difference between male and female diabetic patients after CABG surgery with renal complications (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.95-2.1, p = 0.132) or mortality (OR 1.6, 95% CI 0.85-2.8, p = 0.153). CONCLUSION: Female diabetic patients, when compared to male diabetic patients undergoing CABG, have significantly more intraoperative complications and longer hospital stays following surgery.
Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Diabetes Mellitus/fisiopatología , Atención Perioperativa , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores SexualesRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Our aim was to assess the feasibility of totally endoscopic robotic mitral valve surgery using a novel atrial retractor manipulated by a fourth arm da Vinci surgical system (Intuitive Surgical Inc, Sunnyvale, CA). DESCRIPTION: Eighteen patients with mitral valve disease underwent totally endoscopic mitral valve surgery using the retractor. It was inserted in the second or third intercostal space just lateral to the sternum, and it was manipulated at the robotic console for dynamic exposure of the valve structures. EVALUATION: Mitral valve repair procedures were feasible in all patients with the robotic-controlled atrial retractor providing superior exposure of the mitral valve anatomy. The time until satisfactory exposure of the mitral valve was noticeably decreased with the robotic retractor. All patients were discharged home in sinus rhythm and transesophageal echocardiography revealed competent mitral valves. CONCLUSIONS: The EndoWrist atrial retractor (Intuitive Surgical Inc) facilitated complex totally endoscopic mitral valve surgery, including concomitant procedures, regardless of pathology with excellent clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Diseño de Equipo , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Robótica , Adulto , Anciano , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Endoscopía/métodos , Femenino , Atrios Cardíacos/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
A cohort study with prospective data collection was conducted to determine which risk factors and outcome variables are statistically significant clinical predictors of mortality from infective endocarditis. A study was performed from an eleven-year, hospitalization cohort (N=11,230) in which the data were collected prospectively. The study examined 21 potential risk factors and 14 outcome variables. The risk factors were categorized into these various groups: patient factors, cardiac factors, co-morbidities, operative factors, infectious factors, and complications. The outcome variables were categorized into operative factors, infectious factors, and complications. Inclusion criteria included patients with endocarditis (N=87). Longer operative time, operative complications, and postoperative complications. Overall mortality was 11.5 percent (N=10). Endocarditis patients who died were significantly older (p=0.023) and had a longer pump time (p=0.017) than those who survived. Endocarditis patients who died were more likely to experience an unstable hemodynamic status (p=0.012). There was a significant difference between survival and non-survival of patients with endocarditis on nine outcome variables. They were more likely to require a re-operation for bleeding (p=0.034). Renal complications (p=0.016), neurological complications (p=0.004), pulmonary complications (p=0.001), intra-operative complications (p=0.035), and IAPB (p<0.001) were all more likely to occur in endocarditis patients who died. There are risk factors that serve as predictors of mortality from infectious endocarditis. These include age greater than 65 years, longer pump time, and unstable hemodynamic status. Outcome variables that reflected significant mortality included operative complications and post-operative complications. These factors may identify those patients with infective endocarditis eligible for more aggressive treatment.
Asunto(s)
Endocarditis Bacteriana/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Endocarditis Bacteriana/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: : The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of simple to complex endoscopic robotic mitral valve repair, using a lateral approach. METHODS: : Data were retrospectively collected on 201 patients undergoing a lateral "ports only" endoscopic robotic mitral valve repair at three institutions. Techniques of aortic occlusion included the endoaortic balloon or a transthoracic clamp. The efficacy of the repair was measured intraoperatively by transesophageal echocardiogram. RESULTS: : Two hundred one patients with a mean age of 55.2 ± 14.2 were intended to undergo elective robotic mitral valve surgery. One hundred eighty-six (92.5%) were scheduled for a repair procedure and 15 (7.5%) were scheduled for replacement. The repair was accomplished in 179 of 186 (96.2%) of patients. Eight patients (4.3%) required a conversion to sternotomy incision. Seven converted patients received a mitral valve repair and one received a replacement mitral valve. Mitral valve pathology included 10% isolated anterior leaflet involvement, 43% isolated posterior leaflet involvement, and 6% bileaflet pathology, and the remaining patients had dilated annulus, chordal rupture, or elongation. One hundred seventy-nine patients (96.2%) had regurgitation grade of 0 to 1 after repair. Two patients (1%) died. Other adverse events included reoperation for valve-related complications, 2 of 201 (1%); reoperation for cardiac-related complications, 3 of 201 (1.5%); and new onset of atrial fibrillation, 35 of 201 (17.4%). CONCLUSIONS: : A lateral endoscopic robotic approach to mitral valve repair is safe, feasible, and can be performed consistently with acceptable postoperative results. Further follow-up is required to determine the long-term efficacy of this approach to robotic mitral valve repair.
RESUMEN
HYPOTHESIS: There is an increased operative risk in patients with a history of peripheral vascular disease (PVD) who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). There are also outcome differences associated with these patients. DESIGN: A study from a 10-year hospitalization cohort with prospective data collection. SETTING: Multiple hospitals in the Greater Cincinnati area with 1 surgical group of cardiac surgeons. PARTICIPANTS: Cases were CABG patients with PVD, which was defined as having a history of type 1 neurologic injury, prior vascular surgery, or current vascular disease (n = 1561). Controls were CABG patients without PVD (n = 6328). INTERVENTIONS: The study examined 42 potential confounding risk factors and 16 outcome variables. RESULTS: Twenty-nine potential risk factors were found to be significantly different between CABG patients with and without PVD. Twenty-six confounding risk factors were correlated with 3 factors. Logistic regression analysis showed that even after controlling for sex, significant associative disorders, and other procedures, CABG patients with PVD still experienced more arrhythmias requiring treatment (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.33; P = .01), neurological complications (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.43-2.07; P<.001), pulmonary complications (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.23-1.62; P<.001), low output (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.09-1.45; P = .001), and intraoperative complications (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.06-1.83; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a PVD history undergoing CABG had more coexistent risk factors. These patients also exhibited higher rates of cardiac, systemic, renal, neurologic, and pulmonary complications.
Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/complicaciones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
With the goals of creating a better match between medical students and general surgery programs and providing a program that is desirable to medical students who are interested in pursuing careers in surgery, a survey was designed to categorize student interests and to determine what factors are used in choosing a general surgery program. The survey focused on the reasons that surgical resident candidates select a program. Each statement was rated for importance on a 5-point scale, and then the top 10 statements were ranked in order of importance. The survey was distributed to 19 community hospitals, 23 university programs, and medical students interviewing for surgical residency. A total of 286 surveys were returned from 18 programs and medical students. The statements with the three highest ratings were "amount of operative exposure," "diversity of operative cases," and "perceived relationships among faculty and residents." "Amount of operative exposure," "diversity of operative cases," and "ability to pursue fellowship training after residency" received the top rankings. There was a significant difference between men and women in the ratings of three statements. However, there was no difference with the ranking of the statements. There was also a significant difference between residents early and late in their training on ratings of five statements and on the ranking of two statements. The ratings of six statements were significantly different between community and university programs. A significant difference between types of program was also found with the rankings of four statements. There was a difference between small and large programs on two ratings of statements and one ranking. This data provides a useful resource for programs and candidates in preparing for candidate/residency selection.
Asunto(s)
Selección de Profesión , Cirugía General/educación , Internado y Residencia/organización & administración , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Movilidad Laboral , Recolección de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Carga de TrabajoRESUMEN
We sought to assess predictors and outcomes of sternal wound complications in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). A nested, case-control study from a 10-year hospitalization cohort with prospective data collection was conducted. Included in the cohort were patients age 18 and above undergoing CABG surgery between March 1997 and July 2003 (n = 7889). Patients who underwent any surgery other CABG were excluded. Cases were matched to controls 1:3 on year of surgery. Cases were CABG patients with sternal wound complications, which was defined as requiring antibiotics and/or topical treatment, requiring extra nursing care, dehiscence, or requiring surgical intervention (n = 89). Controls were CABG patients without sternal wound complications (n = 267). The study examined 29 risk factors and 10 outcome variables. Univariate analysis on the risk factors revealed 10 significant risk factors. Logistic regression analysis was conducted and the risk factors that significantly predicted sternal wound complications after CABG surgery included older age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.808-0.892), previous CABG surgery (OR = 3.9, 95% CI 1.03-15.37), and in class three or four of the New York Heart Association functional class (OR = 2.8, 95% CI 1.27-6.12). There was a significant difference between CABG patients with and without sternal wound complications on nine outcome variables. Of the 29 predictors of post-CABG sternal wound infections being examined, 10 proved to be significant. Further analysis demonstrated only three variables that significantly predicted sternal wound complications. Older age, previous CABG surgery, and class three or four of the New York Heart Association functional class predispose CABG patients to sternal wound infections.
Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Esternón , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Factores de Edad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/terapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Our objective was to assess surgical outcomes between male and female patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The study was conducted from a 10-year hospitalization cohort (n = 11,230) in which the data were collected prospectively. Inclusion criteria included an off-pump CABG-only procedure. There were 526 men and 250 women included in the study. Fourteen potential confounding risk factors and 14 outcome variables were examined. Six potential risk factors were found to be significantly different between men and women. Men were younger (P = 0.014), had a larger body surface area (P < 0.001), a higher creatinine level (P < 0.001), required more grafts (P < 0.001), and were more likely to have a cerebrovascular history (P = 0.020) and a history of tobacco use (P < or = 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that even after controlling for age, body surface area, creatinine level, number of grafts, and tobacco history, women had longer length of hospitalization (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-3.04, P = 0.002) and more sternal wound complications than men (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.11, P = 0.028) after off-pump CABG. Although not statistically different, women had lower operative mortality than men after off-pump CABG (0.8% [2 of 10] compared with 1.5% [8 of 10], respectively). Despite women requiring a longer hospitalization and having a greater incidence of sternal wound infections than men, there was no significant difference in mortality.