Patterns, incidence and predictive factors for pain after interventional radiology.

AIM: To evaluate prospectively the pattern, severity and predictive factors of pain after interventional radiological procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing non-arterial radiological interventional procedures were assessed using a visual-analogue scale (VAS) for pain before and at regular intervals for 24 h after their procedure. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty patients (87 men, mean age 62 years, range 18-92 years) were entered into the study. Significant increases in VAS score occurred 8 h after percutaneous biliary procedures (+47.7 mm, SD 14.9 mm; p=0.001), 6 h after central venous access and gastrostomy insertion (+23.7 mm, SD 19.5 mm; p=0.001 and +28.4 mm, SD 9.7 mm; p=0.007, respectively) and 4h after oesophageal stenting (+27.8 mm, SD 20.2 mm, p=0.001). Non-significant increases in VAS pain score were observed after duodenal and colonic stenting (duodenal: +5.13 mm, SD 7.47 mm; p=0.055, colonic: +23.3 mm, SD 13.10 mm, p=0.250) at a mean of 5h (range 4-6h). Patients reported a significant reduction in pain score for nephrostomy insertion (-28.4mm, SD 7.11 mm, p=0.001). Post-procedural analgesia was required in 99 patients (69.2%), 40 (28.0%) requiring opiates. Maximum post-procedural VAS pain score was significantly higher in patients who had no pre-procedural analgesia (p=0.003). CONCLUSION: Post-procedural pain is common and the pattern and severity of pain between procedures is variable. Pain control after interventional procedures is often inadequate, and improvements in pain management are required.

Bispectral index monitoring for conscious sedation in intervention: better, safer, faster.

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare subjective (Ramsay sedation score, RSS) with objective electroencephalogram-based bispectral index (BIS) assessment, and to validate the appropriate BIS range for measurement of conscious sedation in interventional procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing sedo-analgesia (midazolam and fentanyl) for interventional gastrointestinal procedures were divided into two groups. In group A (n=30) sedation was guided by the RSS with the operator blinded to the BIS recording. In group B (n=70) the operator titrated intravenous sedation to maintain an optimal BIS, predetermined from the results in group A. Recovery time, procedure duration, physiological parameters and unplanned events were recorded in both groups. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between the BIS and RSS (p<0.001). BIS values of 87.2 and 80.9 corresponded to an RSS of 3 and 4, respectively. The optimal BIS level was defined as 80-85. Fifty-seven point five percent of readings were within this range in group B compared with 26.5% in group A (p<0.001). Sedation approaching general anaesthesia (BIS<60) occurred in 5.5% of patients in group A but not in group B. Mean recovery time, duration of procedure, midazolam and fentanyl doses were significantly reduced in group B. Unplanned events were reduced from 27 to 17%, but this was not statistically significant (p=0.29). CONCLUSION: BIS monitoring enables more effective titration of sedatives to maintain a suitable level of consciousness, whilst reducing procedure time. The BIS offers an objective, safe and reliable measure of sedation, without disturbing either patient or operator. BIS monitoring raises the standard of patient care, and in our view, should be used to augment standard assessment.

The consent process in interventional radiology: the role of specialist nurses.

AIMS: To evaluate the impact of patient education by specialist nurses on patients' understanding of interventional procedures, their anxiety levels and satisfaction with the given information. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients attending the radiology department for gastrointestinal interventional procedures were interviewed. Patients were assessed using a combination of categorical and visual analogue scales. Parameters were assessed on admission and after additional information had been given by specialist nurses. After the procedure patients were asked to rate the quality of information given and their overall satisfaction. RESULTS: Four of the 60 patients were excluded due to a Mini Mental Test score of <7. Only 35 (62.5%) claimed to have been given information by the referring consultant. Fifty-three patients received additional information before formally giving consent, 50 (96.2%) from the specialist nurses. Patient anxiety before and after information did not significantly change (p=0.52) but there was significant improvement in levels of satisfaction (p=0.001) and perceived understanding (p<0.001). Patients rated overall quality of information at an average of 9.2/10 and overall satisfaction was high (median=9.1/10). CONCLUSION: The use of specialist nurses to educate patients greatly increases patient understanding. The process of informed consent is improved and patient satisfaction is increased.

Conscious sedation for endoscopic and non-endoscopic interventional gastrointestinal procedures: meeting patients' expectations, missing the standard.

AIM: To assess the level of sedation, patient satisfaction and frequency of unplanned events with conscious sedation for interventional procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and seventeen patients were assessed prospectively before, during and after procedures. Blood pressure, pulse, oxygen saturation and sedation level were monitored and patients followed up after 24 h. Sedation was scored after drugs were given in accordance with an established protocol. Doses were recorded, as were patients' weight, age and ASA grade and any unplanned events and their management. RESULTS: Seventy-six of the 117 patients (65%) had no unplanned event, 20 (17.1%) became agitated, 15 (12.8%) hypotensive, three (2.6%) hypoxic and three (2.6%) had more than one response. Twelve patients required active management. Fifty-two (44.4%) had a sedation level of

Comparison of standard and steerable catheters for bile duct cannulation in ERCP.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare two steerable endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) catheters with regard to speed and safety in cannulating the common bile duct. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A standard cannula, a short-nosed sphincterotome, and a bendable catheter were used. At two tertiary centres, a total of 312 patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment with one of three catheters and either by a trainee or an expert endoscopist. When cannulation failed, a further attempt was made with a different catheter. If this failed, a change in operator or other manoeuvres followed. The following were assessed: time to cholangiography and deep cannulation, number of attempts and success rates of cannulation, number of pancreatic duct injections, success of catheter cross-over, and complication rates. RESULTS: Both steerable catheters were significantly better for the initial cholangiogram than the standard catheter (standard catheter 75 %, bendable catheter 84 %, sphincterotome 88 %; P = 0.038), with no significant differences between the bendable catheter and the sphincterotome. Both were also better for deep cannulation of the bile duct (standard cannula 66 %, bendable catheter 69 %, sphincterotome 78 %; P = 0.15). When the standard catheter failed, a steerable catheter succeeded in 26 % of cases. Trainees experienced greater benefit from using steerable catheters. For experts, the bendable catheter was the quickest to achieve cholangiography and deep cannulation. Further manoeuvres had an 85-90 % success rate in allowing biliary access. Twenty of 23 needle-knife papillotomies (87 %) were successful when other methods had failed. The overall ERCP success rate was 97 %. Pancreatitis occurred in 5.3 % of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Steerable catheters allow faster access and can succeed when a standard catheter fails. If cannulation is difficult, changing the catheter should be considered at an early stage. Needle-knife papillotomy is a successful technique in expert hands.

Gastrostomy insertion: comparing the options--PEG, RIG or PIG?

AIM: To compare percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) with radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) and assess a hybrid gastrostomy technique (per-oral image-guided gastrostomy, PIG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty PEGs and 50 RIGs performed in three centres were prospectively compared and the endoscopic findings of 200 PEGs reviewed. A fluoroscopy-guided technique was modified to place 20 F over-the-wire PEG-tubes in 60 consecutive patients. RESULTS: Technical success was 98%, 100% and 100% for PEG, RIG and PIG, respectively. Antibiotic prophylaxis significantly reduced stoma infection for orally placed tubes (p=0.02). Ten out of 50 (20%) small-bore RIG tubes blocked. Replacement tubes were required in six out of 50 PEGs (12%), 10 out of 50 RIGs (20%), but no PIGs (p<0.001). No procedure-related complications occurred. The function of radiologically placed tubes was significantly improved with the larger PIG (p<0.001), with similar wound infection rates. PIG was successful in 24 patients where endoscopic insertion could not be performed. Significant endoscopic abnormalities were found in 42 out of 200 PEG patients (21%), all related to peptic disease. Insignificant pathology was found in 8.5%. CONCLUSION: PIG combines advantages of both traditional methods with a higher success and lower re-intervention rate. Endoscopy is unlikely to detect clinically relevant pathology other than peptic disease. PIG is a very effective gastrostomy method; it has better long-term results than RIG and is successful where conventional PEG has failed.

Diagnostic quality in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: comparison between lodixanol and lopromide.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The contrast medium for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) must produce adequate images, whilst keeping the risk of complications to a minimum. There is a theoretical reason to suppose that a dimeric isosmolar medium may be superior to a monomeric hyperosmolar medium. We have compared two such media in a triple-centre double-blind randomized study on patients referred with a clinical indication for ERCP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 160 patients were randomly allocated to either lodixanol or lopromide. Assessments were made of the quality of images and the complications encountered. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were evaluated. Apart from a trend towards better diagnostic quality for main pancreatic duct imaging with lodixanol, there were no differences between the two groups. The overall frequencies of adverse events were similar CONCLUSIONS: lodixanol is a safe and effective water-soluble contrast medium for ERCP, comparable to lopromide, but despite theoretical advantages lodixanol has no clear practical benefit.

Early mobilization following angioplasty.

AIM: To assess the incidence of puncture site complications in in-patients undergoing early mobilization following angioplasty with a view to performing day case angioplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty-eight patients undergoing peripheral and renal angioplasty using a sheath size of up to 6 French were recruited prospectively. The mobilization protocol consisted of supine bed rest for 2 h, followed by gradual mobilization, so that the patient was ambulant 4 h after the procedure. Mobilization was delayed if clinically appropriate. Puncture sites were scored for discomfort, paraesthesia, visible bruising and palpable haematoma after groin compression and the following morning. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-four puncture sites were studied. There were 44 haematomas in total, of which 37 (26%) were less than 2.5 cm and seven (4.9%) were between 2.5 cm and 7.5 cm. Four patients (2.8%) had visible bruising greater than 7.5 cm. No patient assessed discomfort higher than moderate at any stage. Mobilization was delayed in 15 patients. In 11 this was due to puncture site oozing, haematoma in one, two were hypertensive and one required surgery for limb ischaemia. All complications occurred within 4 h of angioplasty. No patient required surgery or transfusion for haemorrhagic complications. CONCLUSION: Mobilization at 4 h was successful in 90% of cases but 10% require more prolonged bed rest. No delayed complications occurred. These results suggest that day case angioplasty is feasible in most cases.Butterfield, J. S. (2000). Clinical Radiology55, 874-877

A prospective randomised multicentre trial comparing 10 Fr Teflon Tannenbaum stents with 10 Fr polyethylene Cotton-Leung stents in patients with malignant common duct strictures.

BACKGROUND: Stent blockage is a multifactorial process in which stent design and materials, bacteria, proteins, and bile viscosity play a role. AIMS: To compare the patency of the 10 Fr Teflon Tannenbaum (TT) stent to that of the 10 Fr Cotton-Leung (CL) polyethylene stent with sideholes, in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice. METHODS: Patients were recruited to this prospective multicentre randomised study if they had a newly diagnosed malignant bile duct stricture below the hilum of the liver suitable for stenting with a 10 Fr stent. Data were collected and monitored by a professional monitoring company. Primary patency was the interval between stent placement and first exchange or death without recurrent jaundice. RESULTS: 134 consecutive patients were recruited between November 1994 and June 1997; 65 were randomised to the TT stent and 69 to the CL stent. Median patency and 95% confidence intervals were 181 (59, 303) days for the TT stent and 133 (92, 174) days for the CL stent, with no significant difference between the two stents (p=0.49). Median survival and 95% confidence intervals were 115 (71, 159) days for the TT stent and 151 (112, 190) days for the CL stent, with no significant difference between the two stents (p=0.765). CONCLUSION: Neither Teflon as a stent material nor the Tannenbaum design prolong the patency of plastic stents.

Technique for providing analgesia during percutaneous biliary interventional procedures.

AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of interpleural analgesia during percutaneous transhepatic biliary procedures. METHOD: With the patient lying in the left lateral decubitus position a right sided interpleural catheter was sited at a chosen point between the 6th and 9th interspaces. Lignocaine was injected to provide a splanchnic and intercostal nerve block. The technique of interpleural block (IPB) is described. Assessment of the pulse, BP and O(2)saturation during the subsequent biliary procedure was made. The patient evaluated the maximum degree of pain felt during the biliary procedure according to a four-point pain scale (0-3). The nurse and radiologist also gave an objective assessment of the pain score. RESULTS: An IP catheter was successfully placed in 22 patients, one patient having the IPB on two occasions. Siting of the IP catheter failed in three patients. Good analgesia with no requirement for further analgesia or sedation was achieved in 11 patients on 12 occasions. Seven patients required additional small doses of analgesia for mild pain during the biliary procedure. IPB failed in four patients who required additional analgesia and sedation. No complication of the IPB technique occurred in our patient group. CONCLUSION: IPB is a safe and relatively effective method for analgesia during transhepatic percutaneous biliary procedures.