Is it possible to predict urodynamic stress urinary incontinence in women with minimal diagnostic evaluation?

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether it is possible to predict urodynamic stress urinary incontinence (uSUI) in women with minimal diagnostic evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of 2,643 female incontinent patients were reviewed and 301 women were eligible for this study. The positive predictive values (PPV), sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive values (NPV) for uSUI and uSUI with or without detrusor overactivity (DO), and DO patients of pure SUI symptom (group 1), combination of pure SUI symptom and positive provocative stress test (+PST; group 2) and combination of pure SUI symptom, +PST and absence of overactive bladder symptoms (group 3) were calculated for each group. RESULTS: Mean age was 51.03 years (22-88). PPV, sensitivity and specificity values for uSUI with or without DO of group 3 were 100, 7.4, and 100%, while these values for pure uSUI were 93.3, 9.3, and 99.3%, respectively. Interestingly, none of the patients in groups 2 and 3 had DO. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that it was possible to predict uSUI with high accuracy using minimal diagnostic evaluation in a group of female patients with pure stress incontinence symptoms +PST while it was also possible to eliminate DO accurately in this group of patients.

Core length in prostate biopsy: size matters.

PURPOSE: The diagnostic yield of prostate biopsy is limited. Increasing the number of cores enhances the cancer detection rate by sampling additional sites and obtaining more tissue. An alternative way to inspect more tissue would be to obtain longer cores. However, the impact of biopsy core length on cancer detection rate is an undervalued topic. We assessed the role of biopsy core length in prostate biopsy and determined the minimal tissue length to serve as quality assurance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 331 patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound guided initial prostate biopsy with 12 to 18 cores. The biopsy procedure and pathological evaluation were standardized. Core length was compared in patients with vs without cancer. Statistical analysis was done to determine a minimally acceptable cutoff for biopsy length. RESULTS: We analyzed data on 245 patients. The overall cancer detection rate was 30.2%. Mean core length in patients with vs without cancer was 12.3±2.6 vs 11.4±2.4 mm (p=0.015). Thus, core length was significantly longer in patients with cancer. Core length greater than 11.9 mm was associated with an increased prostate cancer detection rate (OR 2.57, 95% 1.46-4.52). The cancer detection rate for cores less vs greater than 11.9 mm was 23% vs 39%. CONCLUSIONS: Needle core length is an important morphometric parameter of transrectal prostate biopsy that directly influences the cancer detection rate. Results suggest a core length of greater than 11.9 mm as a cutoff for quality assurance.